ring:writing-dev-reports
Writing a structured markdown dev report for a completed development epic: reads accumulated epic metrics (TDD, coverage, delivery, lint, file-size, license), computes a quality score with tiers, and records root-cause and next-cycle improvements. Use after an epic completes in ring:running-dev-cycle or when asked for a development feedback report. Skip for documentation-only epics or outside a dev cycle.
What this skill does
# Dev Report — Feedback Loop
## When to use
- After epic completion in any dev cycle
- User requests a development report or feedback summary
- ring:running-dev-cycle Gate 10 handoff
## Skip when
- Epic was documentation-only with no code changes
- Not inside a development cycle
Collects metrics and writes a structured report for completed development epics.
## Step 1: Collect Metrics
Read `accumulated_metrics` from each completed epic (`state.epics[].accumulated_metrics`),
then gather the following per epic:
```yaml
epic_id: {unit_id}
completed_at: {ISO timestamp}
agent_used: {ring:backend-go | ring:frontend | etc.}
language: {go | typescript | python}
service_type: {api | worker | batch | cli | frontend | bff}
tdd:
red_status: completed | skipped | failed
green_status: completed | skipped | failed
coverage:
actual_percent: {float}
threshold: {float}
verdict: PASS | FAIL
delivery:
requirements_total: {int}
requirements_delivered: {int}
verdict: PASS | PARTIAL | FAIL
quality:
lint_pass: true | false
file_size_violations: {int}
license_violations: {int}
migration_safety: PASS | FAIL | N/A
```
## Step 2: Calculate Score
```
score = 0
TDD RED completed: +20
TDD GREEN completed: +20
Coverage ≥ threshold: +20
Delivery PASS: +20
Lint pass: +10
No file size violations: +5
License headers OK: +5
Total: 100 possible
```
Score tiers:
- 90-100: Excellent
- 80-89: Good
- 70-79: Acceptable
- < 70: Needs attention → root cause required
## Step 3: Write Report
Save to `docs/ring:writing-dev-reports/{epic_id}-{timestamp}.md`:
```markdown
# Dev Report: {epic_id}
**Completed:** {timestamp}
**Agent:** {agent_used}
**Language:** {language} | **Service Type:** {service_type}
## Score: {score}/100 ({tier})
## Metrics
| Metric | Value | Status |
|--------|-------|--------|
| TDD RED | {status} | ✅/❌ |
| TDD GREEN | {status} | ✅/❌ |
| Coverage | {actual}% (threshold: {threshold}%) | ✅/❌ |
| Delivery | {delivered}/{total} requirements | ✅/⚠️/❌ |
| Lint | {pass/fail} | ✅/❌ |
| File Size | {violations} violations | ✅/❌ |
| License | {violations} violations | ✅/❌ |
## Delivery Traceability
| Requirement | Status | Evidence |
|-------------|--------|----------|
{per-requirement rows}
## Issues Found
{list of ISSUE-XXX with severity and description}
## Root Cause (if score < 70)
{mandatory analysis: what caused the gaps, pattern identification}
## Improvements for Next Cycle
{1-3 concrete, actionable improvements}
```
## Severity Reference
| Severity | Criteria |
|----------|----------|
| CRITICAL | Score 0 (rejected), complete workflow failure |
| HIGH | Score < 70, threshold breach |
| MEDIUM | Score 70-79, recurring pattern emerging |
| LOW | Score 80-89, minor improvements available |
Related in Writing & Docs
jax-development
IncludedUse this skill when the user is writing, debugging, profiling, refactoring, reviewing, benchmarking, parallelising, exporting, or explaining JAX code, or when they mention JAX, jax.numpy, jit, grad, value_and_grad, vmap, scan, lax, random keys, pytrees, jax.Array, sharding, Mesh, PartitionSpec, NamedSharding, pmap, shard_map, Pallas, XLA, StableHLO, checkify, profiler, or the JAX repo. It helps turn NumPy or PyTorch-style code into pure functional JAX, fix tracer/control-flow/shape/PRNG bugs, remove recompiles and host-device syncs, choose transforms and sharding strategies, inspect jaxpr/lowering/IR, and benchmark compiled code correctly.
nature-article-writer
IncludedDrafts, rewrites, diagnostically critiques, and style-calibrates primary research manuscripts for Nature and Nature Portfolio journals. Use when the user wants a Nature-style title, summary paragraph or abstract, introduction, results, discussion, methods, figure legends, presubmission enquiry, cover letter, reviewer response, or when a scientific draft sounds generic, jargon-heavy, structurally weak, or AI-ish and needs precise, broad-reader-friendly prose without inventing data, analyses, or references. Best for primary research articles and letters rather than reviews or press releases unless explicitly adapting one.
deckrd
IncludedDocument-driven framework that derives requirements, specifications, implementation plans, and executable tasks from goals through structured AI dialogue. Use when user says "write requirements", "create spec", "plan implementation", "derive tasks", "structure this feature", "break down into tasks", or "document this module". Also use for reverse engineering existing code into docs (/deckrd rev). Do NOT use for direct code writing — use /deckrd-coder after tasks are generated. Do NOT use when the user only wants to run or fix existing code without planning.
clinical-decision-support
IncludedGenerate professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical and clinical research settings, including patient cohort analyses (biomarker-stratified with outcomes) and treatment recommendation reports (evidence-based guidelines with decision algorithms). Supports GRADE evidence grading, statistical analysis (hazard ratios, survival curves, waterfall plots), biomarker integration, and regulatory compliance. Outputs publication-ready LaTeX/PDF format optimized for drug development, clinical research, and evidence synthesis.
handling-sf-data
IncludedSalesforce data operations with 130-point scoring. Use this skill to create, update, delete, bulk import/export, generate test data, and clean up org records using sf CLI and anonymous Apex. TRIGGER when: user creates test data, performs bulk import/export, uses sf data CLI commands, needs data factory patterns for Apex tests, or needs to seed/clean records in a Salesforce org. DO NOT TRIGGER when: SOQL query writing only (use querying-soql), Apex test execution (use running-apex-tests), or metadata deployment (use deploying-metadata).
accelint-ac-to-playwright
IncludedConvert and validate acceptance criteria for Playwright test automation. Use when user asks to (1) review/evaluate/check if AC are ready for automation, (2) assess if AC can be converted as-is, (3) validate AC quality for Playwright, (4) turn AC into tests, (5) generate tests from acceptance criteria, (6) convert .md bullets or .feature Gherkin files to Playwright specs, (7) create test automation from requirements. Handles both bullet-style markdown and Gherkin syntax with JSON test plan generation and validation.