running-effective-1-1s
Run effective 1:1s and skip-levels as a manager/leader and produce a 1:1 Operating System Pack (cadence plan, agendas, shared doc templates, coaching prompts, career conversation plan, and quality gates). Use for 1:1, one-on-one, 1-on-1, manager check-ins, coaching, career conversations, and skip levels. Category: Leadership.
What this skill does
# Running Effective 1:1s ## Scope **Covers** - Designing a lightweight **1:1 operating system** (purpose, cadence, meeting types, shared docs) - Running 1:1s as **coaching conversations** (not just status updates) - Holding **career development** conversations (life story → future dreams → action plan) - Doing basic **wellbeing/recovery** check-ins (joy/energy) without crossing into therapy/medical advice - Running **skip-levels** and special sessions (e.g., post-crisis “make them feel heard” 1:1s) **When to use** - “My 1:1s are turning into status updates—help me redesign them.” - “Create a 1:1 agenda + shared doc template for me and my direct reports.” - “I’m a new manager—set up my 1:1 cadence and question bank.” - “Help me run better career conversations in 1:1s.” - “Plan a skip-level program and templates.” **When NOT to use** - You need HR/legal guidance, an investigation, or a performance improvement plan (involve HR/legal; use your company process) - You need a project status meeting cadence (use team/ops rituals; 1:1s should not be the primary status channel) - The situation involves immediate safety/mental health crisis (seek professional help and follow company policy) ## Inputs **Minimum required** - Your role and context (manager level, org type, function, time zones) - Who the 1:1s are for (directs, skip-levels) and relationship stage (new, stable, strained) - Current 1:1 cadence and what’s not working (2–5 concrete examples) - What you want to change (coaching, feedback, career growth, wellbeing, alignment, retention) - Constraints: meeting load, confidentiality/PII rules, any HR policies, time box/deadline **Missing-info strategy** - Ask up to 5 questions from [references/INTAKE.md](references/INTAKE.md) (3–5 at a time). - If key details are missing, proceed with a **default 1:1 operating system** and clearly label assumptions. - Do not request secrets or sensitive personal data; use anonymized summaries. ## Outputs (deliverables) Produce a **1:1 Operating System Pack** in Markdown (in-chat; or as files if requested): 1) **Context + goals** (what 1:1s are for in this team; what they are not for) 2) **Cadence + meeting types plan** (weekly/biweekly + barbell approach + skip-level cadence) 3) **Shared 1:1 doc templates** (agenda, notes, action items, topics backlog) 4) **Coaching toolkit** (conversation rules + question bank + “coach vs advisor” prompts) 5) **Career development conversation plan** (life story → dreams → action plan, with templates) 6) **Wellbeing/recovery check-in pattern** (joy/energy prompts + boundaries + escalation guidance) 7) **Special-situation playbooks** (post-crisis listening session; urgent topical meeting; skip-level template) 8) **Risks / Open questions / Next steps** (always included) Templates: [references/TEMPLATES.md](references/TEMPLATES.md) Expanded guidance: [references/WORKFLOW.md](references/WORKFLOW.md) ## Workflow (8 steps) ### 1) Intake + boundaries + safety - **Inputs:** user context; [references/INTAKE.md](references/INTAKE.md). - **Actions:** Confirm goals for 1:1s, current failure modes, constraints, and any HR/safety boundaries. Decide which deliverables are needed (full pack vs just templates). - **Outputs:** Context snapshot + assumptions/unknowns list. - **Checks:** The purpose of 1:1s is explicit and does not conflict with HR/legal policy. ### 2) Define the 1:1 purpose and “what goes where” - **Inputs:** goals + failure modes. - **Actions:** Separate topics into channels: team status rituals vs 1:1 coaching, career, feedback, and blockers. Define what the 1:1 should consistently cover (and what it should not). - **Outputs:** “What goes where” map + 1:1 purpose statement. - **Checks:** Status updates have a non-1:1 home (async or team ritual). ### 3) Choose cadence + meeting types (barbell design) - **Inputs:** roster, seniority, relationship needs, time budget. - **Actions:** Propose a cadence plan: standing 1:1s where they add value, plus a **barbell approach** (high-quality relationship catch-ups + urgent topical meetings). Add a skip-level cadence if needed. - **Outputs:** Cadence + meeting types plan. - **Checks:** The plan reduces meeting bloat while improving timeliness and relationship quality. ### 4) Create the shared 1:1 documentation system - **Inputs:** tools available (doc, notes, tracker), privacy constraints. - **Actions:** Define a shared doc per report (or per relationship) with: agenda, running topics backlog, notes, decisions, and action items. Include a pre-work expectation for both sides. - **Outputs:** Shared 1:1 doc template + action item tracker conventions. - **Checks:** Every meeting ends with written next steps and owners; sensitive content is handled appropriately. ### 5) Shift from “advisor” to “coach” (conversation rules) - **Inputs:** common problem types brought to 1:1s. - **Actions:** Write a coaching toolkit: default questions, how to avoid jumping to answers, and how to help the report reason through tradeoffs. Include a “when to be directive” exception list (risk, safety, time-critical). - **Outputs:** Coaching rules + question bank. - **Checks:** The toolkit trains independent problem solving rather than escalating everything to the manager. ### 6) Build a career development sequence (3 conversations) - **Inputs:** role expectations, growth paths, aspirations (if known). - **Actions:** Create a career plan that schedules three deeper conversations: **Life Story**, **Future Dreams**, **Career Action Plan**. Define how tactical 1:1s connect to growth over time. - **Outputs:** Career conversation plan + templates. - **Checks:** The plan results in 1–3 concrete growth bets and follow-up checkpoints. ### 7) Add wellbeing/recovery + special situations - **Inputs:** team stress level, recent change events, relationship health. - **Actions:** Add a lightweight joy/energy check-in pattern and a “behavioral activations” list. Add special playbooks: post-crisis listening session (feel heard), urgent topical meeting, and skip-level structure. - **Outputs:** Wellbeing pattern + special-situation playbooks + templates. - **Checks:** Boundaries are clear (not therapy); escalation paths are documented. ### 8) Quality gate + rollout plan - **Inputs:** full draft pack. - **Actions:** Run [references/CHECKLISTS.md](references/CHECKLISTS.md) and score with [references/RUBRIC.md](references/RUBRIC.md). Add **Risks / Open questions / Next steps**. Propose a 2–4 week pilot with review prompts. - **Outputs:** Final 1:1 Operating System Pack. - **Checks:** Pack is immediately usable; responsibilities and follow-ups are explicit. ## Quality gate (required) - Use [references/CHECKLISTS.md](references/CHECKLISTS.md) and [references/RUBRIC.md](references/RUBRIC.md). - Always include: **Risks**, **Open questions**, **Next steps**. ## Examples **Example 1 (new manager):** “I’m a new product lead with 6 direct reports across time zones. Design my 1:1 cadence, a shared 1:1 doc template, and a coaching question bank. Include a career conversation plan and a 4-week pilot.” Expected: cadence plan + templates + coaching toolkit + career sequence + quality gates. **Example 2 (meeting bloat):** “My calendar is overloaded with weekly 1:1s. I still want strong relationships and fast escalation on urgent topics. Propose a barbell approach, updated agendas, and a skip-level cadence.” Expected: reduced standing roster with explicit alternatives; relationship catch-ups + urgent topical meetings; skip-level template. **Boundary example:** “I need to document poor performance and start a PIP.” Response: recommend HR/performance management process; offer to help create a feedback conversation plan and expectations doc, but not to run an HR process via 1:1 templates.
Related in Writing & Docs
jax-development
IncludedUse this skill when the user is writing, debugging, profiling, refactoring, reviewing, benchmarking, parallelising, exporting, or explaining JAX code, or when they mention JAX, jax.numpy, jit, grad, value_and_grad, vmap, scan, lax, random keys, pytrees, jax.Array, sharding, Mesh, PartitionSpec, NamedSharding, pmap, shard_map, Pallas, XLA, StableHLO, checkify, profiler, or the JAX repo. It helps turn NumPy or PyTorch-style code into pure functional JAX, fix tracer/control-flow/shape/PRNG bugs, remove recompiles and host-device syncs, choose transforms and sharding strategies, inspect jaxpr/lowering/IR, and benchmark compiled code correctly.
nature-article-writer
IncludedDrafts, rewrites, diagnostically critiques, and style-calibrates primary research manuscripts for Nature and Nature Portfolio journals. Use when the user wants a Nature-style title, summary paragraph or abstract, introduction, results, discussion, methods, figure legends, presubmission enquiry, cover letter, reviewer response, or when a scientific draft sounds generic, jargon-heavy, structurally weak, or AI-ish and needs precise, broad-reader-friendly prose without inventing data, analyses, or references. Best for primary research articles and letters rather than reviews or press releases unless explicitly adapting one.
deckrd
IncludedDocument-driven framework that derives requirements, specifications, implementation plans, and executable tasks from goals through structured AI dialogue. Use when user says "write requirements", "create spec", "plan implementation", "derive tasks", "structure this feature", "break down into tasks", or "document this module". Also use for reverse engineering existing code into docs (/deckrd rev). Do NOT use for direct code writing — use /deckrd-coder after tasks are generated. Do NOT use when the user only wants to run or fix existing code without planning.
clinical-decision-support
IncludedGenerate professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical and clinical research settings, including patient cohort analyses (biomarker-stratified with outcomes) and treatment recommendation reports (evidence-based guidelines with decision algorithms). Supports GRADE evidence grading, statistical analysis (hazard ratios, survival curves, waterfall plots), biomarker integration, and regulatory compliance. Outputs publication-ready LaTeX/PDF format optimized for drug development, clinical research, and evidence synthesis.
handling-sf-data
IncludedSalesforce data operations with 130-point scoring. Use this skill to create, update, delete, bulk import/export, generate test data, and clean up org records using sf CLI and anonymous Apex. TRIGGER when: user creates test data, performs bulk import/export, uses sf data CLI commands, needs data factory patterns for Apex tests, or needs to seed/clean records in a Salesforce org. DO NOT TRIGGER when: SOQL query writing only (use querying-soql), Apex test execution (use running-apex-tests), or metadata deployment (use deploying-metadata).
accelint-ac-to-playwright
IncludedConvert and validate acceptance criteria for Playwright test automation. Use when user asks to (1) review/evaluate/check if AC are ready for automation, (2) assess if AC can be converted as-is, (3) validate AC quality for Playwright, (4) turn AC into tests, (5) generate tests from acceptance criteria, (6) convert .md bullets or .feature Gherkin files to Playwright specs, (7) create test automation from requirements. Handles both bullet-style markdown and Gherkin syntax with JSON test plan generation and validation.