sales-observe-ai
Observe.AI platform help — enterprise contact center intelligence with Auto QA scoring on 100% of interactions, Agent Copilot real-time guidance, Coaching Copilot post-call performance management, VoiceAI and ChatAI virtual agents, screen recording, Insights Copilot. Use when setting up Observe.AI Auto QA scorecards for contact center agents, Agent Copilot not surfacing guidance during live calls, transcription accuracy issues or speaker attribution errors, comparing Observe.AI vs Balto or Cresta or CallMiner for contact center QA, integrating Observe.AI with Five9 or Amazon Connect or Talkdesk, or configuring compliance monitoring and regulatory audit trails. Do NOT use for building a general coaching program (use /sales-coaching) or reviewing a specific call transcript (use /sales-call-review).
What this skill does
# Observe.AI Platform Help
## Step 1 — Gather context
If `references/learnings.md` exists, read it first for accumulated platform knowledge.
1. **What do you need help with?**
- A) Setting up Auto QA scorecards and evaluation criteria
- B) Configuring Agent Copilot for real-time guidance
- C) Coaching Copilot — post-call performance management
- D) VoiceAI or ChatAI virtual agent setup
- E) CCaaS integration (Five9, Amazon Connect, Talkdesk, etc.)
- F) API integration — pulling interactions, transcripts, evaluations
- G) Comparing Observe.AI to another tool (Balto, Cresta, CallMiner, Enthu.AI)
- H) Compliance monitoring and audit trails
- I) Other
2. **What's your current setup?**
- A) Evaluating whether to buy
- B) New — haven't started implementation
- C) In implementation (3-6 month timeline)
- D) Running but having issues
- E) Expanding to new modules (adding Agent Copilot, VoiceAI, etc.)
3. **What's your CCaaS/telephony?**
- A) Five9
- B) Amazon Connect
- C) Talkdesk
- D) NICE CXone
- E) Genesys
- F) Avaya
- G) Twilio
- H) 8x8
- I) Other
4. **Contact center size?**
- A) Small (< 50 agents)
- B) Mid-size (50-200 agents)
- C) Large (200-1,000 agents)
- D) Enterprise (1,000+ agents)
Skip-ahead rule: if the user's prompt already contains enough context, skip to Step 2.
## Step 2 — Route or answer directly
| Problem domain | Route to |
|---|---|
| Building a coaching program or training cadence | `/sales-coaching {user's question}` |
| Reviewing a specific call transcript for coaching | `/sales-call-review {user's question}` |
| Choosing between note-taker/conversation intelligence platforms | `/sales-note-taker {user's question}` |
| General CRM/tool integration patterns (Zapier, webhooks) | `/sales-integration {user's question}` |
Otherwise, answer directly using the platform reference below.
## Step 3 — Observe.AI platform reference
**Read `references/platform-guide.md`** for the full platform reference — modules, pricing, integrations, data model, workflows.
Answer the user's question using only the relevant section. Don't dump the full reference.
## Step 4 — Actionable guidance
You no longer need the platform guide — focus on the user's specific situation.
**Implementation priority order:**
1. Connect your CCaaS first — call data must flow before anything else works
2. Configure Auto QA with a starter scorecard (5-8 criteria) — validate transcription accuracy on 50+ calls before trusting scores
3. Set coaching thresholds — which score ranges trigger supervisor alerts
4. Roll out Coaching Copilot for managers with coaching dashboards
5. Add Agent Copilot for real-time guidance once post-call QA is stable
6. VoiceAI/ChatAI agents last — these require the most tuning and governance setup
**When comparing to competitors:**
- vs **Balto**: Balto is stronger on real-time during-call guidance (sub-200ms), Observe.AI is stronger on post-call QA analytics and has broader AI agent capabilities. Balto deploys in 45-60 days vs Observe.AI's 3-6 months.
- vs **Cresta**: Similar enterprise scope. Cresta has Knowledge Agent (RAG from knowledge bases during calls) and stronger virtual agent capabilities. Observe.AI has stronger post-call QA and compliance audit trails.
- vs **Enthu.AI**: Enthu is faster to deploy (hours not months), cheaper (~$15-69/user/mo), and needs no minimums. Observe.AI is for enterprise scale (100+ agents) with deeper analytics and AI agent capabilities.
If you discover a gotcha, workaround, or tip not covered in `references/learnings.md`, append it there.
## Gotchas
> *Best-effort from research — review these, especially items about plan-gated features and integration gotchas that may be outdated.*
- **Transcription accuracy degrades with accents, background noise, and overtalk.** Validate accuracy on your actual call recordings before trusting Auto QA scores. Speaker attribution (agent vs customer) errors are a known pain point — test diarization quality early.
- **No public pricing.** All five tiers require "Talk to sales." Estimated $100-500/user/mo based on review sites. Get a direct quote — pricing varies by agent count, modules, and contract length.
- **Implementation takes 3-6 months** for full deployment. Unlike Enthu.AI (hours) or Balto (45-60 days), Observe.AI requires significant setup for CCaaS integration, QA calibration, and agent rollout.
- **Post-call analytics were the original focus.** Real-time Agent Copilot is newer — if real-time during-call coaching is your primary need, evaluate Balto or Cresta alongside Observe.AI.
- **API docs are JS-rendered and partially gated.** The Redoc page at api-docs.observe.ai exists but requires JavaScript rendering. Plan for limited self-serve API exploration — you may need to request the OpenAPI spec from your account team.
- **Call segmentation on long calls.** Users report that long calls get split into smaller segments, losing full context for QA scoring. Ask about segmentation behavior during evaluation.
- **EU AI Act (August 2026)** will require documenting how AI generates QA recommendations and giving agents the ability to challenge AI feedback. Discuss compliance readiness with Observe.AI before committing.
## Related skills
- `/sales-call-review` — Review specific sales calls and extract coaching insights
- `/sales-coaching` — Build coaching programs, onboarding, role-plays, certifications
- `/sales-note-taker` — Compare AI note-takers and conversation intelligence tools or wire APIs into CRM
- `/sales-enthu` — Enthu.AI platform help (contact center QA, affordable alternative for smaller teams)
- `/sales-balto` — Balto platform help (real-time AI guidance for contact centers, fastest deployment)
- `/sales-cresta` — Cresta platform help (enterprise contact center AI, broadest scope)
- `/sales-salesken` — Salesken platform help (real-time coaching + QA, multilingual, APAC focus)
- `/sales-gong` — Gong platform help (enterprise revenue intelligence, sales-focused CI)
- `/sales-do` — Not sure which skill to use? The router matches any sales objective to the right skill. Install: `npx skills add sales-skills/sales --skill sales-do`
## Examples
### Example 1: Evaluating Observe.AI for a 500-agent contact center
**User says**: "We have 500 agents on Five9 and only review 2% of calls manually. Would Observe.AI help?"
**Skill does**:
1. Confirms Observe.AI's core value — Auto QA on 100% of calls vs manual sampling
2. Explains Five9 native integration and implementation timeline
3. Compares pricing and deployment vs alternatives (Balto, Cresta, Enthu.AI)
4. Recommends starting with Post-interaction AI tier, adding Agent Copilot later
**Result**: Clear evaluation framework with implementation roadmap
### Example 2: Transcription accuracy issues
**User says**: "Our Observe.AI transcripts are inaccurate — agents are being misscored because of bad transcription"
**Skill does**:
1. Identifies common causes: accents, background noise, overtalk, speaker diarization errors
2. Recommends reviewing Auto QA scorecard criteria — make criteria less transcript-dependent where possible
3. Suggests working with Observe.AI support on transcription model tuning
4. Notes workarounds: use sentiment/keyword tracking alongside transcript-based scoring
**Result**: Troubleshooting plan for transcription quality issues
### Example 3: Comparing contact center QA tools
**User says**: "Observe.AI vs Balto vs Cresta — which one for a 200-agent insurance call center?"
**Skill does**:
1. Maps each platform's strengths to insurance use case (compliance, real-time guidance, QA)
2. Recommends Observe.AI or Cresta for post-call QA depth, Balto for real-time compliance alerts
3. Compares pricing ranges and deployment timelines
4. Suggests evaluating all three in a pilot with 20-30 agents
**Result**: Side-by-side comparison tailored to regulated industry requirements
## Troubleshooting
### Auto QA scores seem iRelated in AI Agents
skill-development
IncludedComprehensive meta-skill for creating, managing, validating, auditing, and distributing Claude Code skills and slash commands (unified in v2.1.3+). Provides skill templates, creation workflows, validation patterns, audit checklists, naming conventions, YAML frontmatter guidance, progressive disclosure examples, and best practices lookup. Use when creating new skills, validating existing skills, auditing skill quality, understanding skill architecture, needing skill templates, learning about YAML frontmatter requirements, progressive disclosure patterns, tool restrictions (allowed-tools), skill composition, skill naming conventions, troubleshooting skill activation issues, creating custom slash commands, configuring command frontmatter, using command arguments ($ARGUMENTS, $1, $2), bash execution in commands, file references in commands, command namespacing, plugin commands, MCP slash commands, Skill tool configuration, or deciding between skills vs slash commands. Delegates to docs-management skill for official documentation.
reprompter
IncludedTransform messy prompts into well-structured, effective prompts — single or multi-agent. Use when: "reprompt", "reprompt this", "clean up this prompt", "structure my prompt", rough text needing XML tags and best practices, "reprompter teams", "repromptception", "run with quality", "smart run", "smart agents", multi-agent tasks, audits, parallel work, anything going to agent teams. Don't use when: simple Q&A, pure chat, immediate execution-only tasks. See "Don't Use When" section for details. Outputs: Structured XML/Markdown prompt, quality score (before/after), optional team brief + per-agent sub-prompts, agent team output files. Success criteria: Single mode quality score ≥ 7/10; Repromptception per-agent prompt quality score 8+/10; all required sections present, actionable and specific.
adaptive-compaction
IncludedAdaptive add-on policy and recovery layer that decides WHEN to compact, prune, snapshot, or fork -- replacing fixed-percent auto-compaction across Claude Code, Codex, and MCP-capable hosts. Trigger on auto-compact timing or damage: "when should I compact", "is it safe to compact now or start a fresh session", "auto-compact fires too early/mid-task", "switching to an unrelated task but the window still has space", "context rot", "answers get worse the longer the session runs", "the agent forgot the plan or my decisions after it summarized", "add a layer on top that manages context without changing the agent", raising autoCompactWindow to give the policy room, or installing/tuning a cross-tool compaction policy or PreCompact hook -- even when "compaction" is never said but the problem is context-window pressure or post-summarization memory loss. Do NOT use to summarize a conversation, build RAG, write a summarization prompt (decides WHEN not HOW), or answer max-context-length trivia.
agent-skill-creator
IncludedCreate cross-platform agent skills from workflow descriptions. Activates when users ask to create an agent, automate a repetitive workflow, create a custom skill, or need advanced agent creation. Triggers on phrases like create agent for, automate workflow, create skill for, every day I have to, daily I need to, turn process into agent, need to automate, create a cross-platform skill, validate this skill, export this skill, migrate this skill. Supports single skills, multi-agent suites, transcript processing, template-based creation, interactive configuration, cross-platform export, and spec validation.
llm-wiki
IncludedUse when building or maintaining a persistent personal knowledge base (second brain) in Obsidian where an LLM incrementally ingests sources, updates entity/concept pages, maintains cross-references, and keeps a synthesis current. Triggers include "second brain", "Obsidian wiki", "personal knowledge management", "ingest this paper/article/book", "build a research wiki", "compound knowledge", "Memex", or whenever the user wants knowledge to accumulate across sessions instead of being re-derived by RAG on every query.
skill-master
IncludedAgent Skills authoring, evaluation, and optimization. Create, edit, validate, benchmark, and improve skills following the agentskills.io specification. Use when designing SKILL.md files, structuring skill folders (references, scripts, assets), ingesting external documentation into skills, running trigger evals, benchmarking skill quality, optimizing descriptions, or performing blind A/B comparisons. Keywords: agentskills.io, SKILL.md, skill authoring, eval, benchmark, trigger optimization.