sales-playvox
Playvox (by NICE) platform help — modular WEM suite for contact centers with Quality Management scorecards, Workforce Management forecasting/scheduling, Performance Management dashboards, Coaching & eLearning, and Agent Motivation gamification. Use when Playvox QA scorecards not evaluating correctly, Playvox WFM scheduling or adherence reports confusing, Playvox keeps logging out or losing saved work, Playvox performance slow or pages not loading, comparing Playvox pricing tiers ($30-90/agent/mo per module), integrating Playvox with Zendesk or Salesforce or Five9, evaluating Playvox after NICE acquisition risks, or setting up Playvox gamification and leaderboards. Do NOT use for NICE CXone platform configuration (use /sales-nice-cxone) or comparing CCaaS platforms (use /sales-ccaas-selection).
What this skill does
# Playvox Platform Help
## Step 1 — Gather context
If `references/learnings.md` exists, read it first for accumulated platform knowledge.
1. **What do you need help with?**
- A) Quality Management — scorecards, evaluations, QA sampling
- B) Workforce Management — forecasting, scheduling, adherence
- C) Performance Management — KPI dashboards, goal tracking
- D) Coaching & eLearning — learning modules, training content
- E) Agent Motivation — gamification, badges, leaderboards, rewards
- F) Customer AI — VoC analytics, sentiment
- G) API integration or data import/export
- H) Integrations with Zendesk, Salesforce, or other platforms
- I) Pricing comparison or module selection
- J) NICE acquisition — migration concerns, feature deprecation risks
- K) Other
2. **Current setup?**
- A) Evaluating whether to buy
- B) New — setting up for the first time
- C) Running but having issues
- D) Considering migrating away (post-NICE acquisition)
3. **Contact center size?**
- A) Small (< 50 agents)
- B) Mid-size (50-200 agents)
- C) Large (200+ agents)
Skip-ahead rule: if the user's prompt already contains enough context, skip to Step 2.
## Step 2 — Route or answer directly
| Problem domain | Route to |
|---|---|
| Building a coaching program or training cadence | `/sales-coaching {user's question}` |
| Comparing QA tools (Playvox vs MaestroQA vs Observe.AI) | `/sales-coaching` for cross-platform comparison |
| Choosing a CCaaS platform | `/sales-ccaas-selection {user's question}` |
| NICE CXone platform-specific questions | `/sales-nice-cxone {user's question}` |
| Help desk platform selection | `/sales-helpdesk-selection {user's question}` |
| Real-time agent coaching during calls | `/sales-balto {user's question}` or `/sales-cresta {user's question}` |
| Comparing standalone WEM platforms (Playvox vs Calabrio vs Verint) | Answer directly — see Step 3 |
When routing to another skill, provide the exact command.
## Step 3 — Playvox platform reference
**Read `references/platform-guide.md`** for the full platform reference — modules, pricing, integrations, data model, workflows.
Answer the user's question using only the relevant section. Don't dump the full reference.
## Step 4 — Actionable guidance
You no longer need the platform guide — focus on the user's specific situation.
- **Module selection**: Start with QM if QA is the pain point, then add WFM. Don't buy all modules at once — Playvox's modular pricing lets you scale.
- **Integration architecture**: One Playvox instance per Zendesk/CRM instance is the standard pattern. Plan for this if you have multiple CRM instances.
- **NICE acquisition risk**: If evaluating today, consider whether Playvox features you need overlap with NICE CXone built-in WEM. If they do, you may be forced to migrate eventually. If they don't (gamification, eLearning), Playvox may persist as a standalone product.
- **Performance issues**: Clear browser cache, use Chrome, avoid having multiple Playvox tabs open. If slow loading persists, escalate to support with HAR file.
If you discover a gotcha, workaround, or tip not covered in `references/learnings.md`, append it there.
## Gotchas
> *Best-effort from research — review these, especially items about plan-gated features and integration gotchas that may be outdated.*
- **NICE acquisition uncertainty** — Playvox was acquired by NICE. Significant feature overlap with NICE CXone WEM raises risks of forced migrations, feature deprecation, and pricing increases for existing Playvox customers. Evaluate your contract renewal terms carefully.
- **QA samples only 2-5% of interactions** — Unlike AI-first tools (Observe.AI, Convin, Balto) that score 100% of calls, Playvox QM uses manual + random sample evaluation. If you need 100% automated QA, Playvox alone won't cover it.
- **Separate instance per Zendesk instance** — If your org runs multiple Zendesk instances, you'll need a Playvox instance for each. This gets expensive and complicates reporting.
- **Frequent auto-logouts** — Multiple G2 reviewers report being logged out unexpectedly and losing unsaved work. Save frequently.
- **WFM adherence reports confusing** — The adherence report layout is not intuitive. Request a walkthrough from your Playvox CSM during onboarding.
- **Developer portal is JS-rendered** — API docs at developers.playvox.com may not load in all browsers. Use the help center articles as fallback.
- **Support responsiveness varies** — Some customers report support ghosting during onboarding. Escalate through your account executive if support is unresponsive.
## Related skills
- `/sales-nice-cxone` — NICE CXone platform help (Playvox's parent company CCaaS)
- `/sales-coaching` — Cross-platform coaching strategy and QA tool comparison
- `/sales-ccaas-selection` — Comparing CCaaS platforms (Genesys vs NICE vs Talkdesk vs Five9)
- `/sales-maestroqa` — MaestroQA platform help (alternative QA platform with stronger AI analytics)
- `/sales-observe-ai` — Observe.AI platform help (100% automated QA alternative)
- `/sales-balto` — Balto platform help (real-time agent coaching alternative)
- `/sales-calabrio` — Calabrio ONE platform help (standalone WEM alternative, now part of Verint)
- `/sales-verint` — Verint platform help (enterprise WEM alternative, acquired Calabrio)
- `/sales-do` — Not sure which skill to use? The router matches any sales objective to the right skill. Install: `npx skills add sales-skills/sales --skill sales-do`
## Examples
### Example 1: QA scorecard setup
**User says**: "How do I set up QA scorecards in Playvox for customer service calls?"
**Skill does**:
1. Walks through creating evaluation forms with weighted criteria
2. Explains sampling rules and how to configure random vs targeted evaluation
3. Covers calibration sessions for evaluator consistency
4. Sets up coaching triggers for low-scoring agents
### Example 2: NICE acquisition migration risk
**User says**: "We're on Playvox — should we migrate to NICE CXone or look at alternatives?"
**Skill does**:
1. Assesses which Playvox modules the user relies on
2. Identifies overlap with NICE CXone built-in WEM
3. Evaluates migration risk vs staying on Playvox
4. Compares alternatives (Calabrio, Verint, MaestroQA) for the user's specific needs
### Example 3: WFM scheduling issues
**User says**: "Playvox WFM forecasts are way off and schedules don't match actual volume"
**Skill does**:
1. Checks historical data quality and volume patterns
2. Reviews forecasting algorithm settings and interval configuration
3. Identifies common causes of forecast inaccuracy (seasonality, event spikes, data gaps)
4. Suggests adjustment workflow and re-forecasting cadence
## Troubleshooting
### Playvox is slow and keeps logging me out
**Cause**: Browser cache, multiple tabs, or session timeout settings
**Solution**: Clear browser cache, use Chrome, avoid multiple Playvox tabs. Check with IT if SSO session timeout is configured too aggressively. Save work frequently — Playvox doesn't auto-save in all modules.
### QA evaluations don't match what agents actually said
**Cause**: Sampling misses the worst interactions, or scorecard criteria are ambiguous
**Solution**: Increase sample size for agents with low CSAT. Tighten scorecard criteria with specific examples of pass/fail for each item. Run monthly calibration sessions where 3+ evaluators score the same interaction independently and compare.
### Support isn't responding during onboarding
**Cause**: Known support responsiveness issue reported by multiple customers
**Solution**: Escalate through your account executive, not just the support portal. Request a dedicated CSM for onboarding. Document your implementation blockers with screenshots and send to your AE directly.
Related in AI Agents
skill-development
IncludedComprehensive meta-skill for creating, managing, validating, auditing, and distributing Claude Code skills and slash commands (unified in v2.1.3+). Provides skill templates, creation workflows, validation patterns, audit checklists, naming conventions, YAML frontmatter guidance, progressive disclosure examples, and best practices lookup. Use when creating new skills, validating existing skills, auditing skill quality, understanding skill architecture, needing skill templates, learning about YAML frontmatter requirements, progressive disclosure patterns, tool restrictions (allowed-tools), skill composition, skill naming conventions, troubleshooting skill activation issues, creating custom slash commands, configuring command frontmatter, using command arguments ($ARGUMENTS, $1, $2), bash execution in commands, file references in commands, command namespacing, plugin commands, MCP slash commands, Skill tool configuration, or deciding between skills vs slash commands. Delegates to docs-management skill for official documentation.
reprompter
IncludedTransform messy prompts into well-structured, effective prompts — single or multi-agent. Use when: "reprompt", "reprompt this", "clean up this prompt", "structure my prompt", rough text needing XML tags and best practices, "reprompter teams", "repromptception", "run with quality", "smart run", "smart agents", multi-agent tasks, audits, parallel work, anything going to agent teams. Don't use when: simple Q&A, pure chat, immediate execution-only tasks. See "Don't Use When" section for details. Outputs: Structured XML/Markdown prompt, quality score (before/after), optional team brief + per-agent sub-prompts, agent team output files. Success criteria: Single mode quality score ≥ 7/10; Repromptception per-agent prompt quality score 8+/10; all required sections present, actionable and specific.
adaptive-compaction
IncludedAdaptive add-on policy and recovery layer that decides WHEN to compact, prune, snapshot, or fork -- replacing fixed-percent auto-compaction across Claude Code, Codex, and MCP-capable hosts. Trigger on auto-compact timing or damage: "when should I compact", "is it safe to compact now or start a fresh session", "auto-compact fires too early/mid-task", "switching to an unrelated task but the window still has space", "context rot", "answers get worse the longer the session runs", "the agent forgot the plan or my decisions after it summarized", "add a layer on top that manages context without changing the agent", raising autoCompactWindow to give the policy room, or installing/tuning a cross-tool compaction policy or PreCompact hook -- even when "compaction" is never said but the problem is context-window pressure or post-summarization memory loss. Do NOT use to summarize a conversation, build RAG, write a summarization prompt (decides WHEN not HOW), or answer max-context-length trivia.
agent-skill-creator
IncludedCreate cross-platform agent skills from workflow descriptions. Activates when users ask to create an agent, automate a repetitive workflow, create a custom skill, or need advanced agent creation. Triggers on phrases like create agent for, automate workflow, create skill for, every day I have to, daily I need to, turn process into agent, need to automate, create a cross-platform skill, validate this skill, export this skill, migrate this skill. Supports single skills, multi-agent suites, transcript processing, template-based creation, interactive configuration, cross-platform export, and spec validation.
llm-wiki
IncludedUse when building or maintaining a persistent personal knowledge base (second brain) in Obsidian where an LLM incrementally ingests sources, updates entity/concept pages, maintains cross-references, and keeps a synthesis current. Triggers include "second brain", "Obsidian wiki", "personal knowledge management", "ingest this paper/article/book", "build a research wiki", "compound knowledge", "Memex", or whenever the user wants knowledge to accumulate across sessions instead of being re-derived by RAG on every query.
skill-master
IncludedAgent Skills authoring, evaluation, and optimization. Create, edit, validate, benchmark, and improve skills following the agentskills.io specification. Use when designing SKILL.md files, structuring skill folders (references, scripts, assets), ingesting external documentation into skills, running trigger evals, benchmarking skill quality, optimizing descriptions, or performing blind A/B comparisons. Keywords: agentskills.io, SKILL.md, skill authoring, eval, benchmark, trigger optimization.