scope
Exploratory workflow for understanding problem spaces and drafting feature proposals, refactorings, or complex bug-fixes. Creates detailed tickets in your issue tracker without doing implementation work.
What this skill does
# Scope - Problem Space Exploration & Ticket Creation Helps you thoroughly understand a problem space through codebase exploration and iterative dialogue, then creates a well-specified ticket for future implementation. **This skill does NOT write code.** It explores, questions, understands, and documents. ## Workflow ### 1. Initial Discovery **Understand what the user wants to explore:** - What feature are they considering? - What refactoring are they contemplating? - What bug needs detailed investigation? - Is this greenfield or modifying existing code? **Ask clarifying questions:** - Scope and boundaries - Problem statement - Desired outcome (not implementation details yet) Output: Clear understanding of what problem space to explore. ### 2. Codebase Exploration **Use exploration tools to understand context:** - Spawn `Explore` agent (set thoroughness based on scope: "quick", "medium", "very thorough") - Use Grep to find relevant code patterns - Use Read to examine key files identified - Map out the current architecture/implementation **For third-party dependencies:** - Use WebFetch to read API documentation - Clone relevant repositories to `/tmp` for examination if needed - Understand integration points and constraints **Exploration goals:** - Where does this change fit in the architecture? - What existing code will be affected? - What patterns/conventions are already established? - What are the integration points? - What similar features exist that we can learn from? Output: Comprehensive understanding of the relevant codebase areas. ### 3. Iterative Refinement **Use AskUserQuestion to refine understanding:** - Present what you've learned from exploration - Ask about approaches (if multiple valid options exist) - Clarify edge cases and requirements - Discuss trade-offs between approaches - Validate assumptions about existing code **Loop until both Claude and user have:** - Precise understanding of what to build - Clear rationale for approach chosen - Identified edge cases and constraints - Agreed on acceptance criteria **Important:** This is collaborative design, not just requirements gathering. Challenge assumptions, propose alternatives, discuss trade-offs. Output: Shared, precise understanding of the work to be done. ### 4. Ticket Synthesis **Draft ticket content adaptively based on type:** **For feature proposals:** - Problem statement (what problem does this solve?) - Proposed solution (high-level approach) - Acceptance criteria (specific, testable) - Technical notes (implementation considerations, affected components) - Security considerations (if the change introduces new attack surface, handles user input, touches auth/authz, or affects trust boundaries — note what controls will be needed. Consult the `sec-blue-teamer` agent if the implications are non-obvious.) - Out of scope (what explicitly won't be done) - Open questions (if any remain) **For refactorings:** - Current state (what's problematic about existing code) - Desired state (what we want it to look like) - Motivation (why is this worth doing) - Approach (high-level refactoring strategy) - Risk assessment (what could go wrong) - Affected areas (files/modules that will change) **For complex bug fixes:** - Bug description (observed behavior) - Root cause (from your exploration) - Proposed fix (high-level approach) - Why this happened (what allowed the bug) - Verification plan (how to confirm fix works) - Regression prevention (tests/checks to prevent recurrence) **Format guidelines:** - Use markdown - Be specific, not vague - Include code references (file paths, line numbers, function names) - Link to relevant documentation or issues - Make it actionable (someone else should be able to implement from this) Output: Draft ticket content for user review. ### 5. Review & Refine Ticket **Present draft to user:** - Show complete ticket content - Highlight any areas of uncertainty - Ask if anything is missing or unclear **Iterate if needed:** - Adjust based on feedback - Add missing details - Clarify ambiguous sections Output: Approved ticket content ready to create. ### 6. Create Ticket Detect the issue tracker and create the ticket per [`references/trackers.md`](../../references/trackers.md) (Detection Procedure + "Create" operation). Capture and present the resulting ticket URL. Output: Created ticket with URL. ## Skill Boundaries **This skill will:** - Explore code extensively - Ask lots of questions - Synthesize understanding into tickets - Challenge your assumptions - Propose alternatives - Create issues in your issue tracker **This skill will NOT:** - Write production code - Make commits - Run tests or linters - Modify files (except ticket creation) - Implement features ## Notes **Exploration thoroughness:** - Quick exploration: ~5 minutes, high-level understanding - Medium exploration: ~15 minutes, detailed component analysis - Very thorough: ~30 minutes, comprehensive system understanding **Ticket quality over speed:** - Take time to understand deeply - Don't rush to ticket creation - Better to ask more questions than create vague tickets **Integration with /implement:** - These skills are separate and complementary - `/scope` creates the ticket, `/implement` implements it - Ticket created by `/scope` can be handed to someone else or tackled later with `/implement`
Related in General
modeling-omnistudio-epc-catalog
IncludedSalesforce Industries CME EPC product-modeling skill for Product2-based catalog creation. Use when creating EPC products, configuring product attributes, building offer bundles with Product Child Items, or reviewing EPC DataPack JSON metadata for product catalog changes. TRIGGER when: user creates or updates Product2 EPC records, AttributeAssignment payloads, AttributeMetadata/AttributeDefaultValues, Offer bundles, or ProductChildItem relationships. DO NOT TRIGGER when: designing OmniScripts/FlexCards/Integration Procedures (use building-omnistudio-omniscript, building-omnistudio-flexcard, or building-omnistudio-integration-procedure), implementing Apex business logic (use generating-apex), or troubleshooting deployment pipelines (use deploying-metadata).
relationship-science-coach
IncludedUse this skill for direct, practical adult relationship coaching: couples conflict, repair, trust, marriage, dating, flirting, attachment patterns, emotional connection, sex, desire differences, eroticism, kink negotiation, affection, love languages, breakups, and long-term passion. Draw on Gottman, EFT and Hold Me Tight, attachment science, modern sex research, Perel, Nagoski, Kerner, Schnarch, Love and Stosny, and flexible love-language tools. Be concrete and low-hedge. Redirect only for imminent danger, abuse, coercive control, minors, non-consent, self-harm, stalking, or medical/legal/psychiatric decisions.
building-sf-integrations
IncludedSalesforce integration architecture and runtime plumbing with 120-point scoring. Use this skill to set up Named Credentials, External Credentials, External Services, REST/SOAP callout patterns, Platform Events, and Change Data Capture. TRIGGER when: user sets up Named Credentials, External Services, REST/SOAP callouts, Platform Events, CDC, or touches .namedCredential-meta.xml files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: Connected App/OAuth config (use configuring-connected-apps), Apex-only logic (use generating-apex), or data import/export (use handling-sf-data).
venue-templates
IncludedAccess comprehensive LaTeX templates, formatting requirements, and submission guidelines for major scientific publication venues (Nature, Science, PLOS, IEEE, ACM), academic conferences (NeurIPS, ICML, CVPR, CHI), research posters, and grant proposals (NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA). This skill should be used when preparing manuscripts for journal submission, conference papers, research posters, or grant proposals and need venue-specific formatting requirements and templates.
let-fate-decide
IncludedDraws the 12 Houses of the Zodiac Tarot spread to inject entropy into planning when prompts are vague, ambiguous, or casually delegated. Interprets the spread to guide next steps. Use when the user says 'let fate decide', 'YOLO', 'whatever', 'idk', or other nonchalant phrases, makes Yu-Gi-Oh references, or when you are about to arbitrarily pick between multiple reasonable approaches. Prefer over ask-questions-if-underspecified when the user's tone is casual or playful rather than precision-seeking.
net-ops
IncludedCross-platform network troubleshooting (Windows, macOS, Linux) via local or remote shell. Use for: DNS broken, can't resolve hostnames, nslookup/dig works but apps fail, NRPT, WFP, scutil, /etc/resolver, systemd-resolved, /etc/resolv.conf, NetworkManager, VPN DNS leak residue (ProtonVPN/Mullvad/WireGuard/AnyConnect), AV/firewall blocking DNS or DoH, Tailscale DNS interaction, intermittent connectivity, remote diagnostics over SSH.