sdlc:review
Create PR for code review. Use this when the user is ready to submit their work, create a pull request, or send code for review.
What this skill does
# Submit for Review
Commit, push, and create a PR for code review.
In all bash steps below, substitute placeholder names (like BASE_BRANCH, CURRENT_BRANCH, etc.) with the actual values you stored earlier.
## Workflow
1. **Verify branch state** on a feature branch with changes
2. **Detect and remove dead code** introduced by this branch
3. **Commit and push** all changes
4. **Create PR** with a comprehensive description
## Step 1: Verify Branch State
Follow [Branch Verification](../../reference/common-patterns.md#branch-verification).
If CURRENT_BRANCH equals BASE_BRANCH, stop with error: "Cannot create PR from default branch".
Check if a PR already exists for this branch:
```bash
gh pr view --json number,state --jq '.number,.state'
```
If a PR already exists, report its number and state. If it is open, ask the user whether to update the existing PR (just push new commits) or proceed with a new one.
Check for uncommitted changes:
```bash
git status --porcelain
```
If output is empty, check for unpushed commits:
```bash
git log @{u}..HEAD
```
If both are empty, stop: "No changes to submit."
## Step 2: Dead Code Detection
The goal is to catch orphaned code before it lands in the PR. This matters because deleted imports, renamed functions, and removed type references often leave behind unreferenced code that reviewers have to flag.
Get the full diff against the base branch so you can see what was added and removed:
```bash
git diff BASE_BRANCH...HEAD
```
Analyze what was removed or renamed. Specifically:
1. Identify deleted imports, function calls, class references, or type usages in the diff
2. For each deleted reference, search the codebase to see if anything still uses it
3. If a function, class, or type has zero remaining references (in both implementation and test files), remove it
4. If an import was the only consumer of an exported member, check whether that export is still used elsewhere
**Safety guardrails:**
- Only remove code with zero references across the entire codebase
- Preserve exported members that could be part of a public API
- When uncertain, leave the code and note it in the PR description
- Check test files too, as they are valid consumers
Report what was cleaned up (if anything) before proceeding.
## Step 3: Commit and Push
Follow [Commit and Push](../../reference/common-patterns.md#commit-and-push).
## Step 4: Create PR
Get the commit log for the branch:
```bash
git log BASE_BRANCH..HEAD --pretty=format:"- %s%n%b"
```
Use the commits to write a clear PR title and body. The title should be concise (under 70 chars). The body should summarize what changed and why, plus a test plan.
Create the PR using a HEREDOC for the body to preserve formatting:
```bash
gh pr create --base BASE_BRANCH --title "PR title here" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Summary
- bullet points summarizing the changes
## Test plan
- [ ] verification steps
EOF
)"
```
## Output
Report success with the PR URL from the `gh pr create` output.
Related in Code Review
gstack
IncludedFast headless browser for QA testing and site dogfooding. Navigate pages, interact with elements, verify state, diff before/after, take annotated screenshots, test responsive layouts, forms, uploads, dialogs, and capture bug evidence. Use when asked to open or test a site, verify a deployment, dogfood a user flow, or file a bug with screenshots. (gstack)
startup-due-diligence
IncludedLegal due diligence review for seed-stage and Series A startups (US, Delaware C-Corp focus). Supports both investor and founder perspectives. Capabilities include: (1) Interactive document review and issue spotting; (2) Document request list generation; (3) Cap table and SAFE/convertible note analysis; (4) Red flag identification with severity ratings; (5) Diligence report generation. TRIGGERS: due diligence, DD, startup investment, cap table review, Series A, seed round, investor diligence, legal review startup, SAFE analysis, convertible note, 409A, founder vesting.
interview-master
IncludedThis skill should be used when the user asks to "generate interview questions", "prepare for interview", "optimize resume", "conduct mock interview", "analyze git commits for resume", "generate resume from code", "review my resume", or mentions interview preparation, career assistance, or extracting project experience from git history. Provides comprehensive interview and career development guidance for both job seekers and interviewers.
fix-issue
IncludedFixes GitHub issues using parallel analysis agents for root cause investigation, code exploration, and regression detection. Reads issue context from gh CLI, searches codebase and memory for related patterns, generates a fix with tests, and links the resolution back to the issue via PR. Includes prevention analysis to avoid recurrence. Use when debugging errors, resolving regressions, fixing bugs, or triaging issues.
sf-apex
IncludedGenerates and reviews Salesforce Apex code with 150-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user writes, reviews, or fixes Apex classes, triggers, test classes, batch/queueable/schedulable jobs, or touches .cls/.trigger files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: LWC JavaScript (use sf-lwc), Flow XML (use sf-flow), SOQL-only queries (use sf-soql), or non-Salesforce code.
swift-development
IncludedComprehensive Swift development for building, testing, and deploying iOS/macOS applications. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Build Swift packages or Xcode projects from command line, (2) Run tests with XCTest or Swift Testing framework, (3) Manage iOS simulators with simctl, (4) Handle code signing, provisioning profiles, and app distribution, (5) Format or lint Swift code with SwiftFormat/SwiftLint, (6) Work with Swift Package Manager (SPM), (7) Implement Swift 6 concurrency patterns (async/await, actors, Sendable), (8) Create SwiftUI views with MVVM architecture, (9) Set up Core Data or SwiftData persistence, or any other Swift/iOS/macOS development tasks.