searching-sourcegraph
Use when the user needs to search or navigate code with Sourcegraph MCP tools. Provides disciplined search workflows for finding implementations, understanding systems, debugging issues, fixing bugs, and reviewing code.
What this skill does
# Searching Sourcegraph Search before you build. Existing patterns reduce tokens, ensure consistency, and surface tested solutions. ## Tool Selection Logic **Start here:** 1. **Know the exact symbol or pattern?** → `keyword_search` 2. **Know the concept, not the code?** → `nls_search` 3. **Need to understand how/why?** → `deepsearch` → `deepsearch_read` 4. **Tracing a symbol's usage?** → `find_references` 5. **Need full implementation?** → `go_to_definition` → `read_file` 6. **Need to know what repos a user has worked on?** → `get_contributor_repos` | Goal | Tool | |------|------| | Concepts/semantic search | `nls_search` | | Exact code patterns | `keyword_search` | | Trace usage | `find_references` | | See implementation | `go_to_definition` | | Initiate a deep search | `deepsearch` | | Read deep search results | `deepsearch_read` | | Read files | `read_file` | | Browse structure | `list_files` | | Find repos | `list_repos` | | Search commits | `commit_search` | | Track changes | `diff_search` | | Compare versions | `compare_revisions` | | Find repos a user has worked on | `get_contributor_repos` | ## Scoping (Always Do This) ``` repo:^github.com/ORG/REPO$ # Exact repo (preferred) repo:github.com/ORG/ # All repos in org file:.*\.ts$ # TypeScript only file:src/api/ # Specific directory file:.*\.test\.ts$ -file:__mocks__ # Tests, exclude mocks ``` Start narrow. Expand only if results are empty. Combine filters: `repo:^github.com/myorg/backend$ file:src/handlers lang:typescript` ## Context-Aware Behaviour **When the user provides a file path or error message:** - Extract symbols, function names, or error codes - Search for those exact terms first - Trace references if the error involves a known symbol **When the user asks "how does X work":** - Use `deepsearch` to initiate the search, then `deepsearch_read` to retrieve results - Follow up with `read_file` on key files mentioned in the response **When the user asks who worked on something or what repos a contributor has touched:** - Use `get_contributor_repos` with one or more usernames to discover their active repositories - Then scope subsequent searches to those repos **When the user is implementing a new feature:** - Search for similar existing implementations first - Read tests for usage examples - Check for shared utilities before creating new ones **When troubleshooting an error, build failure, or runtime exception:** - Extract exact symbols, error codes, or log lines from the stack trace or build output - Search for the error site, then trace the full call chain with `find_references` - Check recent changes with `diff_search` and `commit_search` early — regressions are common - Identify all affected code paths and services before proposing a fix **When fixing a bug:** - Extract exact symbols from the error message or stack trace - Search for the error site, then trace the full call chain with `find_references` - Check recent changes with `diff_search` and `commit_search` early — regressions are common - Find all affected code paths before writing the fix - Read existing tests to understand intended behaviour ## Workflows For detailed step-by-step workflows, see: - `workflows/implementing-feature.md` — when building new features - `workflows/understanding-code.md` — when exploring unfamiliar systems - `workflows/debugging-issue.md` — when troubleshooting errors, build failures, stack traces, support issues, or runtime exceptions - `workflows/fixing-bug.md` — when fixing bugs with extensive Sourcegraph search - `workflows/code-review.md` — when reviewing a pull request or changeset ## Efficiency Rules **Minimise tool calls:** - Chain searches logically: search → read → references → definition - Don't re-search for the same pattern; use results from prior calls - Prefer `keyword_search` over `nls_search` when you have exact terms (faster, more precise) **Batch your understanding:** - Read 2-3 related files before synthesising, rather than reading one and asking questions - Use `deepsearch` + `deepsearch_read` for "how does X work" instead of multiple keyword searches **Avoid common token waste:** - Don't search all repos when you know the target repo - Don't use `deepsearch` for simple "find all" queries — `keyword_search` is faster - Don't re-read files you've already seen in this conversation ## Query Patterns | Intent | Query | |--------|-------| | React hooks | `file:.*\.tsx$ use[A-Z].*= \(` | | API routes | `file:src/api app\.(get\|post\|put\|delete)` | | Error handling | `catch.*Error\|\.catch\(` | | Type definitions | `file:types/ export (interface\|type)` | | Test setup | `file:.*\.test\. beforeEach\|beforeAll` | | Config files | `file:(webpack\|vite\|rollup)\.config` | | CI/CD | `file:\.github/workflows deploy` | For more patterns, see `query-patterns.md`. ## Output Formatting **Search results:** - Present as a brief summary, not raw tool output - Highlight the most relevant file and line - Include a code snippet only if it directly answers the question **Code explanations:** - Start with a one-sentence summary - Use the codebase's own terminology - Reference specific files and functions **Recommendations:** - Present as numbered steps if actionable - Link to specific patterns found in the codebase - Note any existing utilities that should be reused ## Common Mistakes | Mistake | Fix | |---------|-----| | Searching all repos | Add `repo:^github.com/org/repo$` | | Too many results | Add `file:` pattern or keywords | | Missing relevant code | Try `nls_search` for semantic matching | | Not understanding context | Use `deepsearch_read` | | Guessing patterns | Read implementations with `read_file` | ## Principles - Start narrow, expand if needed - Chain tools: search → read → find references → definition - Check tests for usage examples - Read before generating
Related in AI Agents
skill-development
IncludedComprehensive meta-skill for creating, managing, validating, auditing, and distributing Claude Code skills and slash commands (unified in v2.1.3+). Provides skill templates, creation workflows, validation patterns, audit checklists, naming conventions, YAML frontmatter guidance, progressive disclosure examples, and best practices lookup. Use when creating new skills, validating existing skills, auditing skill quality, understanding skill architecture, needing skill templates, learning about YAML frontmatter requirements, progressive disclosure patterns, tool restrictions (allowed-tools), skill composition, skill naming conventions, troubleshooting skill activation issues, creating custom slash commands, configuring command frontmatter, using command arguments ($ARGUMENTS, $1, $2), bash execution in commands, file references in commands, command namespacing, plugin commands, MCP slash commands, Skill tool configuration, or deciding between skills vs slash commands. Delegates to docs-management skill for official documentation.
reprompter
IncludedTransform messy prompts into well-structured, effective prompts — single or multi-agent. Use when: "reprompt", "reprompt this", "clean up this prompt", "structure my prompt", rough text needing XML tags and best practices, "reprompter teams", "repromptception", "run with quality", "smart run", "smart agents", multi-agent tasks, audits, parallel work, anything going to agent teams. Don't use when: simple Q&A, pure chat, immediate execution-only tasks. See "Don't Use When" section for details. Outputs: Structured XML/Markdown prompt, quality score (before/after), optional team brief + per-agent sub-prompts, agent team output files. Success criteria: Single mode quality score ≥ 7/10; Repromptception per-agent prompt quality score 8+/10; all required sections present, actionable and specific.
adaptive-compaction
IncludedAdaptive add-on policy and recovery layer that decides WHEN to compact, prune, snapshot, or fork -- replacing fixed-percent auto-compaction across Claude Code, Codex, and MCP-capable hosts. Trigger on auto-compact timing or damage: "when should I compact", "is it safe to compact now or start a fresh session", "auto-compact fires too early/mid-task", "switching to an unrelated task but the window still has space", "context rot", "answers get worse the longer the session runs", "the agent forgot the plan or my decisions after it summarized", "add a layer on top that manages context without changing the agent", raising autoCompactWindow to give the policy room, or installing/tuning a cross-tool compaction policy or PreCompact hook -- even when "compaction" is never said but the problem is context-window pressure or post-summarization memory loss. Do NOT use to summarize a conversation, build RAG, write a summarization prompt (decides WHEN not HOW), or answer max-context-length trivia.
agent-skill-creator
IncludedCreate cross-platform agent skills from workflow descriptions. Activates when users ask to create an agent, automate a repetitive workflow, create a custom skill, or need advanced agent creation. Triggers on phrases like create agent for, automate workflow, create skill for, every day I have to, daily I need to, turn process into agent, need to automate, create a cross-platform skill, validate this skill, export this skill, migrate this skill. Supports single skills, multi-agent suites, transcript processing, template-based creation, interactive configuration, cross-platform export, and spec validation.
llm-wiki
IncludedUse when building or maintaining a persistent personal knowledge base (second brain) in Obsidian where an LLM incrementally ingests sources, updates entity/concept pages, maintains cross-references, and keeps a synthesis current. Triggers include "second brain", "Obsidian wiki", "personal knowledge management", "ingest this paper/article/book", "build a research wiki", "compound knowledge", "Memex", or whenever the user wants knowledge to accumulate across sessions instead of being re-derived by RAG on every query.
skill-master
IncludedAgent Skills authoring, evaluation, and optimization. Create, edit, validate, benchmark, and improve skills following the agentskills.io specification. Use when designing SKILL.md files, structuring skill folders (references, scripts, assets), ingesting external documentation into skills, running trigger evals, benchmarking skill quality, optimizing descriptions, or performing blind A/B comparisons. Keywords: agentskills.io, SKILL.md, skill authoring, eval, benchmark, trigger optimization.