sec-annual-comparison
Compare key metrics and disclosures between annual 10-K filings using Octagon MCP. Use when analyzing year-over-year changes in financials, risk factors, business descriptions, and strategic priorities across fiscal years.
What this skill does
# SEC Annual Comparison
Compare key metrics and risk factors between current and previous year 10-K filings for public companies using the Octagon MCP server.
## Prerequisites
Ensure Octagon MCP is configured in your AI agent (Cursor, Claude Desktop, Windsurf, etc.). See [references/mcp-setup.md](references/mcp-setup.md) for installation instructions.
## Workflow
### 1. Identify Analysis Parameters
Determine the following before querying:
- **Ticker**: Stock symbol (e.g., AAPL, MSFT, GOOGL)
- **Years** (optional): Specific fiscal years to compare
- **Focus Areas** (optional): Financials, risks, segments, strategy
### 2. Execute Query via Octagon MCP
Use the `octagon-agent` tool with a natural language prompt:
```
Compare key metrics and risk factors between <TICKER>'s current and previous year 10-K filings.
```
**MCP Call Format:**
```json
{
"server": "octagon-mcp",
"toolName": "octagon-agent",
"arguments": {
"prompt": "Compare key metrics and risk factors between CRM's current and previous year 10-K filings."
}
}
```
### 3. Expected Output
The agent returns structured year-over-year comparison including:
**Financial Metrics:**
- Revenue: $31.353B (FY2023) vs $26.492B (FY2022) - 18.59% growth
- Net Income: $208M (FY2023) vs $1.444B (FY2022) - significant decline
- Total Assets: $98.849B vs $95.209B
- Total Liabilities: $41.755B vs $37.076B
**Key Changes:**
- $1.2B impairment of customer relationships and acquisition assets
- Increased goodwill from acquisitions (Slack, Acumen, Vlocity)
- Debt at $10.682B, covenant compliant
**Risk Factors:**
- Operational, regulatory, financial, market volatility risks
- Industry competition risks
**Data Sources**: octagon-financials-agent, octagon-sec-agent
### 4. Interpret Results
See [references/interpreting-results.md](references/interpreting-results.md) for guidance on:
- Understanding year-over-year trends
- Identifying significant changes
- Evaluating risk factor evolution
- Assessing strategic shifts
## Example Queries
**Full Annual Comparison:**
```
Compare key metrics and risk factors between CRM's current and previous year 10-K filings.
```
**Multi-Year Trend:**
```
Compare AAPL's financial performance across the last 3 fiscal years from 10-K filings.
```
**Risk Factor Evolution:**
```
How have TSLA's risk factors changed between FY2024 and FY2023 10-K filings?
```
**Segment Comparison:**
```
Compare revenue segment breakdown between GOOGL's FY2024 and FY2023 10-K filings.
```
**Strategic Changes:**
```
Compare the business description and strategy sections between MSFT's current and prior year 10-K.
```
**Margin Analysis:**
```
Compare gross margin and operating margin trends between NVDA's FY2024 and FY2023 10-K filings.
```
## Comparison Framework
### Financial Metrics
| Category | Key Metrics |
|----------|-------------|
| Revenue | Total revenue, growth rate, segment breakdown |
| Profitability | Gross profit, operating income, net income |
| Margins | Gross margin, operating margin, net margin |
| Balance Sheet | Assets, liabilities, equity, cash, debt |
| Cash Flow | Operating, investing, financing, free cash flow |
| Per Share | EPS, book value, dividends |
### Operational Metrics
| Category | Key Metrics |
|----------|-------------|
| Customers | Count, retention, concentration |
| Employees | Headcount, productivity |
| Geographic | Revenue by region, asset location |
| Segments | Business unit performance |
### Risk Factors
| Category | What to Compare |
|----------|-----------------|
| Business | Competitive, operational, strategic |
| Financial | Liquidity, debt, currency |
| Regulatory | Compliance, legal |
| Market | Economic, industry |
| Technology | Innovation, disruption |
### Strategic Elements
| Category | What to Compare |
|----------|-----------------|
| Mission | Corporate purpose |
| Strategy | Growth initiatives |
| Investments | R&D, CapEx, M&A |
| Markets | Geographic, product expansion |
## Year-over-Year Analysis
### Financial Trend Assessment
| Metric | Positive Trend | Negative Trend |
|--------|----------------|----------------|
| Revenue | Growing, accelerating | Declining, slowing |
| Margins | Expanding | Contracting |
| Earnings | Increasing | Decreasing |
| Cash Flow | Strengthening | Weakening |
| Debt | Declining | Increasing |
### Key Ratios to Track
| Ratio | Calculation | What It Shows |
|-------|-------------|---------------|
| Revenue Growth | (Current - Prior) / Prior | Top-line momentum |
| Gross Margin | Gross Profit / Revenue | Pricing power, costs |
| Operating Margin | Operating Income / Revenue | Operational efficiency |
| Net Margin | Net Income / Revenue | Bottom-line profitability |
| ROE | Net Income / Equity | Shareholder returns |
| Debt/Equity | Total Debt / Equity | Financial leverage |
### Change Analysis
| Change Type | Significance |
|-------------|--------------|
| >20% improvement | Major positive development |
| 5-20% improvement | Solid progress |
| ±5% | Stable/flat |
| 5-20% decline | Concerning deterioration |
| >20% decline | Material negative change |
## Risk Factor Comparison
### Types of Changes
| Change | What It Means |
|--------|---------------|
| New risk added | Emerging concern |
| Risk removed | Issue resolved or de-emphasized |
| Language expanded | Increased concern |
| Language reduced | Diminished concern |
| Position changed | Priority shift |
| Specificity added | Crystallizing risk |
### Priority Assessment
| Position | Prior Year | Current Year | Interpretation |
|----------|------------|--------------|----------------|
| Top 5 | Top 5 | Top 5 | Persistent priority |
| Lower | Lower | Top 5 | Elevated concern |
| Top 5 | Top 5 | Lower | Reduced priority |
| None | None | Added | New risk |
| Present | Present | Removed | Resolved |
## Business Description Changes
### What to Track
| Section | Changes to Note |
|---------|-----------------|
| Products | New offerings, discontinued products |
| Markets | Geographic expansion, exits |
| Customers | Target market shifts |
| Competition | New competitors, changed positioning |
| Strategy | New initiatives, changed priorities |
| Technology | Platform changes, R&D focus |
### Strategic Shifts
| Indicator | Examples |
|-----------|----------|
| New emphasis | Repeated new terms |
| Removed emphasis | Topics no longer discussed |
| Changed language | Different framing |
| Quantification | New metrics disclosed |
| Commitment | Specific targets stated |
## Segment Performance Comparison
### Revenue Analysis
| Segment | Prior Year | Current Year | Growth | Mix Change |
|---------|------------|--------------|--------|------------|
| Segment A | $X | $Y | Z% | +/- pp |
| Segment B | $X | $Y | Z% | +/- pp |
### Segment Health Indicators
| Indicator | Positive | Negative |
|-----------|----------|----------|
| Growth | Accelerating | Decelerating |
| Margin | Improving | Declining |
| Share of Total | Increasing (if healthy) | Declining |
| Investment | Increasing | Divesting |
## Multi-Year Trend Analysis
### 3-5 Year Comparison
Track over extended periods:
- Revenue CAGR
- Margin trajectories
- Balance sheet evolution
- Risk factor patterns
- Strategic consistency
### Inflection Points
| Signal | What Changed |
|--------|--------------|
| Growth acceleration | New product, market |
| Margin expansion | Scale, efficiency |
| Cash flow improvement | Working capital, CapEx |
| Risk emergence | New competitive threat |
| Strategic pivot | Changed direction |
## Analysis Tips
1. **Start with financials**: Numbers provide objective comparison base.
2. **Read both MD&As**: Management commentary reveals context.
3. **Track risk factor order**: Position indicates priority.
4. **Note new disclosures**: First-time mentions often significant.
5. **Compare segment detail**: Business unit changes reveal strategy.
6. **Check footnote changes**: Accounting policy shifts matter.
## Use Cases
- **Investment researRelated in AI Agents
skill-development
IncludedComprehensive meta-skill for creating, managing, validating, auditing, and distributing Claude Code skills and slash commands (unified in v2.1.3+). Provides skill templates, creation workflows, validation patterns, audit checklists, naming conventions, YAML frontmatter guidance, progressive disclosure examples, and best practices lookup. Use when creating new skills, validating existing skills, auditing skill quality, understanding skill architecture, needing skill templates, learning about YAML frontmatter requirements, progressive disclosure patterns, tool restrictions (allowed-tools), skill composition, skill naming conventions, troubleshooting skill activation issues, creating custom slash commands, configuring command frontmatter, using command arguments ($ARGUMENTS, $1, $2), bash execution in commands, file references in commands, command namespacing, plugin commands, MCP slash commands, Skill tool configuration, or deciding between skills vs slash commands. Delegates to docs-management skill for official documentation.
reprompter
IncludedTransform messy prompts into well-structured, effective prompts — single or multi-agent. Use when: "reprompt", "reprompt this", "clean up this prompt", "structure my prompt", rough text needing XML tags and best practices, "reprompter teams", "repromptception", "run with quality", "smart run", "smart agents", multi-agent tasks, audits, parallel work, anything going to agent teams. Don't use when: simple Q&A, pure chat, immediate execution-only tasks. See "Don't Use When" section for details. Outputs: Structured XML/Markdown prompt, quality score (before/after), optional team brief + per-agent sub-prompts, agent team output files. Success criteria: Single mode quality score ≥ 7/10; Repromptception per-agent prompt quality score 8+/10; all required sections present, actionable and specific.
adaptive-compaction
IncludedAdaptive add-on policy and recovery layer that decides WHEN to compact, prune, snapshot, or fork -- replacing fixed-percent auto-compaction across Claude Code, Codex, and MCP-capable hosts. Trigger on auto-compact timing or damage: "when should I compact", "is it safe to compact now or start a fresh session", "auto-compact fires too early/mid-task", "switching to an unrelated task but the window still has space", "context rot", "answers get worse the longer the session runs", "the agent forgot the plan or my decisions after it summarized", "add a layer on top that manages context without changing the agent", raising autoCompactWindow to give the policy room, or installing/tuning a cross-tool compaction policy or PreCompact hook -- even when "compaction" is never said but the problem is context-window pressure or post-summarization memory loss. Do NOT use to summarize a conversation, build RAG, write a summarization prompt (decides WHEN not HOW), or answer max-context-length trivia.
agent-skill-creator
IncludedCreate cross-platform agent skills from workflow descriptions. Activates when users ask to create an agent, automate a repetitive workflow, create a custom skill, or need advanced agent creation. Triggers on phrases like create agent for, automate workflow, create skill for, every day I have to, daily I need to, turn process into agent, need to automate, create a cross-platform skill, validate this skill, export this skill, migrate this skill. Supports single skills, multi-agent suites, transcript processing, template-based creation, interactive configuration, cross-platform export, and spec validation.
llm-wiki
IncludedUse when building or maintaining a persistent personal knowledge base (second brain) in Obsidian where an LLM incrementally ingests sources, updates entity/concept pages, maintains cross-references, and keeps a synthesis current. Triggers include "second brain", "Obsidian wiki", "personal knowledge management", "ingest this paper/article/book", "build a research wiki", "compound knowledge", "Memex", or whenever the user wants knowledge to accumulate across sessions instead of being re-derived by RAG on every query.
skill-master
IncludedAgent Skills authoring, evaluation, and optimization. Create, edit, validate, benchmark, and improve skills following the agentskills.io specification. Use when designing SKILL.md files, structuring skill folders (references, scripts, assets), ingesting external documentation into skills, running trigger evals, benchmarking skill quality, optimizing descriptions, or performing blind A/B comparisons. Keywords: agentskills.io, SKILL.md, skill authoring, eval, benchmark, trigger optimization.