self-improve-prompt-design
Write self-improve prompts that sync expertise files with codebase reality. Use when creating maintenance workflows for agent experts, designing validation logic, or implementing the LEARN step of Act-Learn-Reuse.
What this skill does
# Self-Improve Prompt Design
Guide for writing self-improve prompts that maintain expertise file accuracy.
## Core Purpose
Self-improve prompts teach agents HOW to learn. They:
- Validate expertise against actual codebase (source of truth)
- Identify drift between mental model and reality
- Update expertise files automatically
- Enforce line limits to prevent context bloat
- Run after every ACT step in Act-Learn-Reuse
## When to Use
- Creating maintenance workflows for agent experts
- Designing validation logic for expertise files
- Implementing the LEARN step of Act-Learn-Reuse
- Writing self-improve prompts for new domains
- Reviewing or debugging existing self-improve prompts
- Setting up git diff conditional checks for efficiency
## Self-Improve Prompt Template
````markdown
---
description: Sync {domain} expertise with codebase reality
argument-hint: [check-git-diff]
---
# Self-Improve: {Domain} Expert
Maintain expertise accuracy by validating against codebase implementation.
## Arguments
- `$1`: check_git_diff flag (optional, default: "true")
- "true": Only check files changed in git diff
- "false": Full rescan of all domain files
## Configuration
- **EXPERTISE_FILE**: `.claude/commands/experts/{domain}/expertise.yaml`
- **MAX_LINES**: 1000
- **DOMAIN_PATHS**: ["path/to/domain/files/"]
## Workflow
### Step 1: Check Git Diff (Conditional)
If `$1` is "true" or not provided:
1. Run `git diff --name-only HEAD~1` to get changed files
2. Filter to files in DOMAIN_PATHS
3. If no relevant changes, report "No domain changes detected" and exit
4. Continue with changed files only
If `$1` is "false":
- Skip git diff check
- Process all files in DOMAIN_PATHS
### Step 2: Read Current Expertise
1. Load EXPERTISE_FILE
2. Parse YAML structure
3. Note current line count
4. Identify sections present
### Step 3: Validate Against Codebase
For each section in expertise:
**core_implementation:**
- Verify all file paths exist
- Check line counts are approximately correct
- Confirm key exports still exist
**key_operations:**
- Verify function names exist
- Check signatures match
- Validate file locations
**schema_structure:** (if applicable)
- Compare against actual schema definitions
- Check field names and types
**best_practices:**
- Ensure still relevant to current patterns
**known_issues:**
- Check if any resolved
- Look for new issues in domain
### Step 4: Identify Discrepancies
Create a list of findings:
| Section | Issue | Action |
| --- | --- | --- |
| core_implementation | file.ext renamed | Update path |
| key_operations | new function added | Add entry |
| known_issues | issue #123 resolved | Remove entry |
### Step 5: Update Expertise File
Apply changes:
1. Update outdated information
2. Add new discoveries
3. Remove stale entries
4. Maintain YAML structure
### Step 6: Enforce Line Limit
If line count > MAX_LINES:
1. Identify lowest priority sections
2. Summarize verbose entries
3. Remove least critical items
4. Continue until under limit
Priority order (highest to lowest):
1. core_implementation
2. key_operations
3. best_practices
4. known_issues
5. patterns_and_conventions
6. testing_notes
### Step 7: Validation Check
1. Parse updated YAML (ensure valid syntax)
2. Verify line count: {current}/{MAX_LINES}
3. Run quick sanity checks on paths/names
## Output Report
```markdown
## Self-Improve Complete: {domain}
### Summary
- Files scanned: X
- Changes detected: Y
- Updates applied: Z
### Changes Made
| Section | Change | Reason |
| --- | --- | --- |
| ... | ... | ... |
### Expertise Health
| Metric | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Line count | X/1000 |
| Files validated | X/X exist |
| Functions verified | X/X accurate |
| Schema accuracy | X% |
### Recommendations
- [Any manual review suggestions]
```
## Notes
- Mental model is NOT source of truth - codebase is
- Run after every ACT (build, fix, modify)
- Check git diff by default to save time
- Full rescan periodically or when drift suspected
````
## Key Design Principles
### 1. Conditional Git Diff Check
Always include git diff optimization:
```markdown
If check_git_diff is true:
- Only process changed files
- Exit early if no relevant changes
- Saves time on routine syncs
```
### 2. Line Limit Enforcement
Must be explicit and prioritized:
```markdown
MAX_LINES: 1000
If over limit:
1. Summarize verbose sections
2. Remove lowest priority items
3. Never exceed limit
```
### 3. Validation Before Update
Always validate before writing:
```markdown
Before writing updated expertise:
1. Parse as YAML (catch syntax errors)
2. Count lines
3. Verify critical paths exist
```
### 4. Actionable Output
Report should enable follow-up:
```markdown
## Changes Made
| Section | Change | Reason |
| --- | --- | --- |
## Recommendations
- Items requiring human review
- Potential issues to investigate
```
## Validation Patterns
### File Path Validation
```markdown
For each file path in expertise:
1. Check if file exists at path
2. If not, search for file by name
3. If found elsewhere, update path
4. If not found, mark for removal
```
### Function Validation
```markdown
For each function in key_operations:
1. Search file for function definition
2. Compare signature if found
3. Update or flag discrepancy
```
### Schema Validation
```markdown
For each table/entity in schema_structure:
1. Find schema definition file
2. Compare fields and types
3. Note additions/removals
```
## Anti-Patterns
| Anti-Pattern | Problem | Solution |
| --- | --- | --- |
| No git diff option | Wastes time on no-ops | Always include conditional check |
| No line limit | Context overflow | Enforce MAX_LINES strictly |
| Silent failures | Drift undetected | Report all validation results |
| Manual edits | Human time wasted | Self-improve only updates |
| No validation | Bad YAML written | Always parse before save |
## Integration with Act-Learn-Reuse
```text
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ ACT: Build, Fix, or Answer │
│ (Agent performs useful work) │
└──────────────────┬──────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ LEARN: Self-Improve Prompt │
│ • Check git diff │
│ • Validate expertise against code │
│ • Update mental model │
│ • Enforce line limits │
└──────────────────┬──────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ REUSE: Next Execution │
│ (Agent reads updated expertise first) │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
## Testing Self-Improve Prompts
To validate a self-improve prompt works correctly:
1. **Initial state**: Run against seeded expertise
2. **Introduce change**: Modify a file in domain
3. **Run self-improve**: Check it detects change
4. **Verify update**: Confirm expertise updated correctly
5. **Line limit test**: Add content until limit hit, verify truncation
## Related Skills
- `expertise-file-design`: Structure of expertise files
- `agent-expert-creation`: Full agent expert workflow
- `meta-agentic-creation`: Self-improving at scale
---
**Last Updated:** 2025-12-15
## Version History
- **v1.0.0** (2025-12-26): Initial release
---
Related in Design
contribute
IncludedLocal-only OSS contribution command center. Auto-refreshes the user's in-flight PR and issue state on invoke so conversations start with full context — no need to brief Claude on what's in flight. Helps the user find issues to contribute to on GitHub, builds per-repo dossiers of what each upstream expects (CLA, DCO, branch convention, AI policy, draft-first, review bots, issue templates), runs deterministic gates before any external action so AI-assisted contributions don't reach maintainers as slop. State is markdown-only: candidate files at ~/.contribute-system/candidates/, repo dossiers at ~/.contribute-system/research/, append-only event log at ~/.contribute-system/log.jsonl. No database, no cloud calls. Use when the user asks about their PRs / issues / contributions, wants to find new work to take on, claim an issue, build/refresh a repo's dossier, or draft a Design Issue or PR. Trigger with "/contribute", "what's my PR status", "find a contribution", "claim issue X", "draft a Design Issue for Y", "refresh dossier for Z".
architectural-analysis
IncludedUser-triggered deep architectural analysis of a codebase or scoped subtree across eight modes — information architecture, data flow, integration points, UI surfaces, interaction patterns, data model, control flow, and failure modes. This skill should be used when the user asks to "diagram this codebase," "map the architecture," "show the data flow," "give me an ERD," "trace control flow," "find the integration points," "verify the layout pattern," "audit the UX architecture," or any similar request whose primary deliverable is mermaid diagrams plus cited reports under docs/architecture/. Dispatches haiku/sonnet sub-agents in parallel for per-mode exploration, then verifies every citation mechanically before any node lands in a diagram. Not for one-off prose explanations of code (use code-explanation) or for high-level system design from scratch (use system-design).
mcp
IncludedModel Context Protocol (MCP) server development and tool management. Languages: Python, TypeScript. Capabilities: build MCP servers, integrate external APIs, discover/execute MCP tools, manage multi-server configs, design agent-centric tools. Actions: create, build, integrate, discover, execute, configure MCP servers/tools. Keywords: MCP, Model Context Protocol, MCP server, MCP tool, stdio transport, SSE transport, tool discovery, resource provider, prompt template, external API integration, Gemini CLI MCP, Claude MCP, agent tools, tool execution, server config. Use when: building MCP servers, integrating external APIs as MCP tools, discovering available MCP tools, executing MCP capabilities, configuring multi-server setups, designing tools for AI agents.
react-native-skia
IncludedDesign, build, debug, and optimise high-polish animated graphics in React Native or Expo using @shopify/react-native-skia, Reanimated, and Gesture Handler. Use when the user wants canvas-driven UI, shaders, paths, rich text, image filters, sprite fields, Skottie, video frames, snapshots, web CanvasKit setup, or performance tuning for custom motion-heavy elements such as loaders, hero art, cards, charts, progress indicators, particle systems, or gesture-driven surfaces. Also use when the user asks for fluid, glow, glass, blob, parallax, 60fps/120fps, or GPU-friendly animated effects in React Native, even if they do not explicitly say "Skia". Do not use for ordinary form/layout work with standard views.
plaid
IncludedProduct Led AI Development — guides founders from idea to launched product. Six capabilities: Idea (discover a product idea), Validate (pressure-test the idea against fatal flaws, problem reality, competition, and 2-week MVP feasibility), Plan (vision intake + document generation), Design (translate image references into a design.md spec), Launch (go-to-market strategy), and Build (roadmap execution). Use when someone says "PLAID", "plaid idea", "help me find an idea", "product idea", "idea from my business", "idea from my expertise", "plaid validate", "validate my idea", "pressure-test", "is this idea good", "find fatal flaws", "validate the problem", "plan a product", "define my vision", "generate a PRD", "product strategy", "plaid design", "design from image", "translate image to design", "create design.md", "extract design tokens", "plaid launch", "go-to-market", "launch plan", "GTM strategy", "launch playbook", "plaid build", "build the app", "start building", or "execute the roadmap".
nextjs-framer-motion-animations
IncludedAdds production-safe Motion for React or Framer Motion animations to Next.js apps, including reveal, hover and tap micro-interactions, whileInView, stagger, AnimatePresence, layout and layoutId transitions, reorder, scroll-linked UI, and lightweight route-content transitions. Use when the user asks to add, refactor, or debug Motion or Framer Motion in App Router or Pages Router codebases, especially around server/client boundaries, reduced motion, LazyMotion, bundle size, hydration, or route transitions. Avoid for GSAP-style timelines, WebGL or 3D scenes, heavy scroll storytelling, or CSS-only effects unless Motion is explicitly requested.