sf-debug
Salesforce debug log analysis and troubleshooting with 100-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user analyzes debug logs, hits governor limits, reads stack traces, or touches .log files from Salesforce orgs. DO NOT TRIGGER when: running Apex tests (use sf-testing), fixing Apex code (use sf-apex), or Agentforce session tracing (use sf-ai-agentforce-observability).
What this skill does
# sf-debug: Salesforce Debug Log Analysis & Troubleshooting Use this skill when the user needs **root-cause analysis from debug logs**: governor-limit diagnosis, stack-trace interpretation, slow-query investigation, heap / CPU pressure analysis, or a reproduction-to-fix loop based on log evidence. ## When This Skill Owns the Task Use `sf-debug` when the work involves: - `.log` files from Salesforce - stack traces and exception analysis - governor limits - SOQL / DML / CPU / heap troubleshooting - query-plan or performance evidence extracted from logs Delegate elsewhere when the user is: - running or repairing Apex tests → [sf-testing](../sf-testing/SKILL.md) - implementing the code fix → [sf-apex](../sf-apex/SKILL.md) - debugging Agentforce session traces / parquet telemetry → [sf-ai-agentforce-observability](../sf-ai-agentforce-observability/SKILL.md) --- ## Required Context to Gather First Ask for or infer: - org alias - failing transaction / user flow / test name - approximate timestamp or transaction window - user / record / request ID if known - whether the goal is diagnosis only or diagnosis + fix loop --- ## Recommended Workflow ### 1. Retrieve logs ```bash sf apex list log --target-org <alias> --json sf apex get log --log-id <id> --target-org <alias> sf apex tail log --target-org <alias> --color ``` ### 2. Analyze in this order 1. entry point and transaction type 2. exceptions / fatal errors 3. governor limits 4. repeated SOQL / DML patterns 5. CPU / heap hotspots 6. callout timing and external failures ### 3. Classify severity - **Critical** — runtime failure, hard limit, corruption risk - **Warning** — near-limit, non-selective query, slow path - **Info** — optimization opportunity or hygiene issue ### 4. Recommend the smallest correct fix Prefer fixes that are: - root-cause oriented - bulk-safe - testable - easy to verify with a rerun Expanded workflow: [references/analysis-playbook.md](references/analysis-playbook.md) --- ## High-Signal Issue Patterns | Issue | Primary signal | Default fix direction | |---|---|---| | SOQL in loop | repeating `SOQL_EXECUTE_BEGIN` in a repeated call path | query once, use maps / grouped collections | | DML in loop | repeated `DML_BEGIN` patterns | collect rows, bulk DML once | | Non-selective query | high rows scanned / poor selectivity | add indexed filters, reduce scope | | CPU pressure | CPU usage approaching sync limit | reduce algorithmic complexity, cache, async where valid | | Heap pressure | heap usage approaching sync limit | stream with SOQL for-loops, reduce in-memory data | | Null pointer / fatal error | `EXCEPTION_THROWN` / `FATAL_ERROR` | guard null assumptions, fix empty-query handling | Expanded examples: [references/common-issues.md](references/common-issues.md) --- ## Output Format When finishing analysis, report in this order: 1. **What failed** 2. **Where it failed** (class / method / line / transaction stage) 3. **Why it failed** (root cause, not just symptom) 4. **How severe it is** 5. **Recommended fix** 6. **Verification step** Suggested shape: ```text Issue: <summary> Location: <class / line / transaction> Root cause: <explanation> Severity: Critical | Warning | Info Fix: <specific action> Verify: <test or rerun step> ``` --- ## Cross-Skill Integration | Need | Delegate to | Reason | |---|---|---| | Implement Apex fix | [sf-apex](../sf-apex/SKILL.md) | code change generation / review | | Reproduce via tests | [sf-testing](../sf-testing/SKILL.md) | test execution and coverage loop | | Deploy fix | [sf-deploy](../sf-deploy/SKILL.md) | deployment orchestration | | Create debugging data | [sf-data](../sf-data/SKILL.md) | targeted seed / repro data | --- ## Reference Map ### Start here - [references/analysis-playbook.md](references/analysis-playbook.md) - [references/common-issues.md](references/common-issues.md) - [references/cli-commands.md](references/cli-commands.md) ### Deep references - [references/debug-log-reference.md](references/debug-log-reference.md) - [references/log-analysis-tools.md](references/log-analysis-tools.md) - [references/benchmarking-guide.md](references/benchmarking-guide.md) ### Rubric - [references/scoring-rubric.md](references/scoring-rubric.md) --- ## Score Guide | Score | Meaning | |---|---| | 90+ | Expert analysis with strong fix guidance | | 80–89 | Good analysis with minor gaps | | 70–79 | Acceptable but may miss secondary issues | | 60–69 | Partial diagnosis only | | < 60 | Incomplete analysis |
Related in Code Review
gstack
IncludedFast headless browser for QA testing and site dogfooding. Navigate pages, interact with elements, verify state, diff before/after, take annotated screenshots, test responsive layouts, forms, uploads, dialogs, and capture bug evidence. Use when asked to open or test a site, verify a deployment, dogfood a user flow, or file a bug with screenshots. (gstack)
startup-due-diligence
IncludedLegal due diligence review for seed-stage and Series A startups (US, Delaware C-Corp focus). Supports both investor and founder perspectives. Capabilities include: (1) Interactive document review and issue spotting; (2) Document request list generation; (3) Cap table and SAFE/convertible note analysis; (4) Red flag identification with severity ratings; (5) Diligence report generation. TRIGGERS: due diligence, DD, startup investment, cap table review, Series A, seed round, investor diligence, legal review startup, SAFE analysis, convertible note, 409A, founder vesting.
interview-master
IncludedThis skill should be used when the user asks to "generate interview questions", "prepare for interview", "optimize resume", "conduct mock interview", "analyze git commits for resume", "generate resume from code", "review my resume", or mentions interview preparation, career assistance, or extracting project experience from git history. Provides comprehensive interview and career development guidance for both job seekers and interviewers.
fix-issue
IncludedFixes GitHub issues using parallel analysis agents for root cause investigation, code exploration, and regression detection. Reads issue context from gh CLI, searches codebase and memory for related patterns, generates a fix with tests, and links the resolution back to the issue via PR. Includes prevention analysis to avoid recurrence. Use when debugging errors, resolving regressions, fixing bugs, or triaging issues.
sf-apex
IncludedGenerates and reviews Salesforce Apex code with 150-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user writes, reviews, or fixes Apex classes, triggers, test classes, batch/queueable/schedulable jobs, or touches .cls/.trigger files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: LWC JavaScript (use sf-lwc), Flow XML (use sf-flow), SOQL-only queries (use sf-soql), or non-Salesforce code.
swift-development
IncludedComprehensive Swift development for building, testing, and deploying iOS/macOS applications. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Build Swift packages or Xcode projects from command line, (2) Run tests with XCTest or Swift Testing framework, (3) Manage iOS simulators with simctl, (4) Handle code signing, provisioning profiles, and app distribution, (5) Format or lint Swift code with SwiftFormat/SwiftLint, (6) Work with Swift Package Manager (SPM), (7) Implement Swift 6 concurrency patterns (async/await, actors, Sendable), (8) Create SwiftUI views with MVVM architecture, (9) Set up Core Data or SwiftData persistence, or any other Swift/iOS/macOS development tasks.