snapshot-test-refactorer
Refactors brittle snapshot tests into resilient, focused assertions. Provides strategies for reducing snapshot size, extracting meaningful assertions, and maintaining snapshots. Use for "snapshot testing", "snapshot refactoring", "brittle tests", or "assertion improvement".
What this skill does
# Snapshot Test Refactorer
Replace brittle snapshots with meaningful, maintainable assertions.
## Problems with Snapshot Tests
```typescript
// ❌ Bad: Full component snapshot
test("renders UserProfile", () => {
const { container } = render(<UserProfile user={mockUser} />);
expect(container).toMatchSnapshot();
});
// Problems:
// 1. Fails on any change (even whitespace)
// 2. No clear intent
// 3. Hard to review diffs
// 4. Doesn't test behavior
// 5. Implementation coupled
```
## Refactoring Strategy
```typescript
// ✅ Good: Specific assertions
test("renders UserProfile with user data", () => {
render(<UserProfile user={mockUser} />);
// Test what matters
expect(screen.getByText(mockUser.name)).toBeInTheDocument();
expect(screen.getByText(mockUser.email)).toBeInTheDocument();
expect(screen.getByRole("img")).toHaveAttribute("src", mockUser.avatar);
});
test("shows edit button for own profile", () => {
render(<UserProfile user={mockUser} isOwnProfile={true} />);
expect(
screen.getByRole("button", { name: "Edit Profile" })
).toBeInTheDocument();
});
test("hides edit button for other profiles", () => {
render(<UserProfile user={mockUser} isOwnProfile={false} />);
expect(
screen.queryByRole("button", { name: "Edit Profile" })
).not.toBeInTheDocument();
});
```
## Inline Snapshots for Data
```typescript
// ❌ Bad: External snapshot file
test("formats user data", () => {
const result = formatUser(mockUser);
expect(result).toMatchSnapshot();
});
// ✅ Good: Inline snapshot (visible in code)
test("formats user data", () => {
const result = formatUser(mockUser);
expect(result).toMatchInlineSnapshot(`
{
"displayName": "John Doe",
"initials": "JD",
"memberSince": "2020-01-01",
}
`);
});
```
## Partial Snapshots
```typescript
// ❌ Bad: Snapshot entire API response
test("fetches user", async () => {
const response = await api.getUser("123");
expect(response).toMatchSnapshot();
});
// ✅ Good: Test important parts
test("fetches user with required fields", async () => {
const response = await api.getUser("123");
expect(response).toMatchObject({
id: "123",
email: expect.stringContaining("@"),
role: expect.any(String),
});
// Snapshot only stable, important data
expect({
name: response.name,
role: response.role,
}).toMatchInlineSnapshot(`
{
"name": "John Doe",
"role": "USER",
}
`);
});
```
## Serializer for Unstable Data
```typescript
// Remove unstable fields before snapshot
expect.addSnapshotSerializer({
test: (val) => val && typeof val === "object" && "createdAt" in val,
serialize: (val) => {
const { createdAt, updatedAt, ...rest } = val;
return JSON.stringify(rest, null, 2);
},
});
// Now timestamps won't break tests
test("creates user", async () => {
const user = await createUser({ name: "Test" });
expect(user).toMatchInlineSnapshot(`
{
"id": "123",
"name": "Test",
"role": "USER"
}
`);
// createdAt automatically removed
});
```
## Snapshot Trimming Strategy
```typescript
// Before: 500 line snapshot
expect(component).toMatchSnapshot();
// After: Focus on critical parts
const criticalElements = {
header: screen.getByRole("banner").textContent,
mainAction: screen.getByRole("button", { name: /submit/i }).textContent,
errorMessage: screen.queryByRole("alert")?.textContent,
};
expect(criticalElements).toMatchInlineSnapshot(`
{
"errorMessage": null,
"header": "Welcome",
"mainAction": "Submit",
}
`);
```
## Visual Regression Alternative
```typescript
// Instead of DOM snapshot, use visual regression
test("Profile component appearance", async ({ page }) => {
await page.goto("/profile");
// Visual snapshot (Playwright)
await expect(page).toHaveScreenshot("profile.png", {
maxDiffPixels: 100,
});
});
```
## When Snapshots Are Acceptable
```typescript
// ✅ OK: Error messages (rarely change)
test("validates email format", () => {
const errors = validateEmail("invalid");
expect(errors).toMatchInlineSnapshot(`
[
"Email must contain @",
"Email must contain domain",
]
`);
});
// ✅ OK: API response structure (stable contract)
test("user API response structure", async () => {
const response = await api.getUser("123");
expect(Object.keys(response).sort()).toMatchInlineSnapshot(`
[
"createdAt",
"email",
"id",
"name",
"role",
"updatedAt",
]
`);
});
// ✅ OK: Serialized data format
test("exports user to JSON", () => {
const json = exportUserToJSON(user);
expect(json).toMatchInlineSnapshot(`
{
"email": "[email protected]",
"name": "John Doe",
"version": "1.0",
}
`);
});
```
## Refactoring Process
```markdown
# Snapshot Refactoring Checklist
For each snapshot test, ask:
1. **What is being tested?**
- If unclear → Replace with specific assertions
2. **Does it test behavior or implementation?**
- Implementation → Refactor to behavior test
3. **How often does this change?**
- Frequently → Use targeted assertions
- Rarely → Snapshot OK
4. **Can I describe what should pass/fail?**
- No → Snapshot is too broad
5. **Would a visual test be better?**
- UI appearance → Use screenshot testing
## Refactoring Steps
1. Run snapshot test, let it fail
2. Look at the diff
3. Extract what actually matters
4. Write assertion for that specific thing
5. Delete snapshot
6. Repeat for next snapshot
```
## Example Refactoring
```typescript
// ❌ Before: Brittle 200-line snapshot
test("renders dashboard", () => {
const { container } = render(<Dashboard user={user} />);
expect(container).toMatchSnapshot();
});
// ✅ After: Multiple focused tests
describe("Dashboard", () => {
test("displays welcome message with user name", () => {
render(<Dashboard user={user} />);
expect(screen.getByText(`Welcome back, ${user.name}!`)).toBeInTheDocument();
});
test("shows user stats", () => {
render(<Dashboard user={user} stats={mockStats} />);
expect(screen.getByText(`${mockStats.orders} orders`)).toBeInTheDocument();
expect(screen.getByText(`$${mockStats.revenue}`)).toBeInTheDocument();
});
test("displays quick actions", () => {
render(<Dashboard user={user} />);
expect(
screen.getByRole("button", { name: "New Order" })
).toBeInTheDocument();
expect(
screen.getByRole("button", { name: "View Reports" })
).toBeInTheDocument();
});
test("shows empty state when no recent activity", () => {
render(<Dashboard user={user} recentActivity={[]} />);
expect(screen.getByText("No recent activity")).toBeInTheDocument();
});
});
```
## Automated Conversion Script
```typescript
// scripts/convert-snapshots.ts
import * as fs from "fs";
import * as path from "path";
function convertSnapshotToAssertions(testFile: string): string {
let content = fs.readFileSync(testFile, "utf-8");
// Replace toMatchSnapshot() with specific assertions
content = content.replace(
/expect\((.+?)\)\.toMatchSnapshot\(\)/g,
(match, element) => {
return `// TODO: Replace with specific assertions
// expect(${element}).to... `;
}
);
return content;
}
```
## Maintenance Strategy
```markdown
# Snapshot Maintenance Guidelines
## When to Update Snapshots
✅ **Update when:**
- Intentional design change
- New feature added
- Bug fix that changes output
- Refactoring that changes structure
❌ **Don't update when:**
- "Jest said to update"
- Test is failing
- Don't understand the change
- Too lazy to investigate
## Review Process
1. Run `jest -u` to update
2. Review EVERY changed snapshot
3. Verify change is intentional
4. If unsure, ask for review
5. Consider if assertion would be better
## Reduce Snapshot Size
- Use `.toMatchObject()` for partial matches
- Extract only relevant data
- Use serializers to remove noise
- Consider inline snapshots
```
## Best Practices
1. **InlinRelated in Code Review
gstack
IncludedFast headless browser for QA testing and site dogfooding. Navigate pages, interact with elements, verify state, diff before/after, take annotated screenshots, test responsive layouts, forms, uploads, dialogs, and capture bug evidence. Use when asked to open or test a site, verify a deployment, dogfood a user flow, or file a bug with screenshots. (gstack)
startup-due-diligence
IncludedLegal due diligence review for seed-stage and Series A startups (US, Delaware C-Corp focus). Supports both investor and founder perspectives. Capabilities include: (1) Interactive document review and issue spotting; (2) Document request list generation; (3) Cap table and SAFE/convertible note analysis; (4) Red flag identification with severity ratings; (5) Diligence report generation. TRIGGERS: due diligence, DD, startup investment, cap table review, Series A, seed round, investor diligence, legal review startup, SAFE analysis, convertible note, 409A, founder vesting.
interview-master
IncludedThis skill should be used when the user asks to "generate interview questions", "prepare for interview", "optimize resume", "conduct mock interview", "analyze git commits for resume", "generate resume from code", "review my resume", or mentions interview preparation, career assistance, or extracting project experience from git history. Provides comprehensive interview and career development guidance for both job seekers and interviewers.
fix-issue
IncludedFixes GitHub issues using parallel analysis agents for root cause investigation, code exploration, and regression detection. Reads issue context from gh CLI, searches codebase and memory for related patterns, generates a fix with tests, and links the resolution back to the issue via PR. Includes prevention analysis to avoid recurrence. Use when debugging errors, resolving regressions, fixing bugs, or triaging issues.
sf-apex
IncludedGenerates and reviews Salesforce Apex code with 150-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user writes, reviews, or fixes Apex classes, triggers, test classes, batch/queueable/schedulable jobs, or touches .cls/.trigger files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: LWC JavaScript (use sf-lwc), Flow XML (use sf-flow), SOQL-only queries (use sf-soql), or non-Salesforce code.
swift-development
IncludedComprehensive Swift development for building, testing, and deploying iOS/macOS applications. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Build Swift packages or Xcode projects from command line, (2) Run tests with XCTest or Swift Testing framework, (3) Manage iOS simulators with simctl, (4) Handle code signing, provisioning profiles, and app distribution, (5) Format or lint Swift code with SwiftFormat/SwiftLint, (6) Work with Swift Package Manager (SPM), (7) Implement Swift 6 concurrency patterns (async/await, actors, Sendable), (8) Create SwiftUI views with MVVM architecture, (9) Set up Core Data or SwiftData persistence, or any other Swift/iOS/macOS development tasks.