solution-interview
Test if your solution actually solves the validated problem before building the full product. Master the art of showing concepts and prototypes to get honest feedback on solution fit. Use when: **After problem interviews** to test if your solution addresses validated problems; **Before building MVP** to validate core value proposition; **Prototype testing** to get feedback on concepts and mockups; **Feature validation** to test if new features solve real problems; **Pivoting** to test alterna...
What this skill does
# Solution Interview
> Test if your solution actually solves the validated problem before building the full product. Master the art of showing concepts and prototypes to get honest feedback on solution fit.
## When to Use This Skill
- **After problem interviews** to test if your solution addresses validated problems
- **Before building MVP** to validate core value proposition
- **Prototype testing** to get feedback on concepts and mockups
- **Feature validation** to test if new features solve real problems
- **Pivoting** to test alternative solutions to the same problem
- **Pricing discovery** to understand willingness to pay
## Methodology Foundation
| Aspect | Details |
|--------|---------|
| **Source** | Cindy Alvarez - "Lean Customer Development" (2014), Steve Blank - Customer Development |
| **Core Principle** | "Show, don't tell. Let customers react to something tangible. Their reactions—not their words—reveal the truth." |
| **Why This Matters** | People can't accurately predict their behavior. By showing a prototype and observing reactions, you get real signal about whether your solution works. |
## What Claude Does vs What You Decide
| Claude Does | You Decide |
|-------------|------------|
| Structures production workflow | Final creative direction |
| Suggests technical approaches | Equipment and tool choices |
| Creates templates and checklists | Quality standards |
| Identifies best practices | Brand/voice decisions |
| Generates script outlines | Final script approval |
## What This Skill Does
1. **Structures solution demos** - How to present concepts effectively
2. **Captures honest reactions** - Gets real feedback, not politeness
3. **Identifies gaps and issues** - What's missing or wrong
4. **Tests willingness to pay** - Early pricing validation
5. **Measures solution fit** - Does this actually solve the problem?
6. **Generates product insights** - What to build, what to skip
## How to Use
### Prepare Solution Interview Script
```
I've validated this problem: [problem]
My proposed solution: [solution concept]
Create a solution interview script to test fit.
Include how to demo and what reactions to look for.
```
### Analyze Solution Interview Results
```
I showed my prototype to [X] people. Here's the feedback: [summary]
Analyze solution fit. Should I proceed to MVP?
```
### Create a Solution Interview Prototype
```
Help me create the minimum viable demo for solution interviews:
Problem: [validated problem]
Solution concept: [idea]
What should I show? What level of fidelity is needed?
```
## Instructions
### Step 1: Confirm Problem Validation First
```
## Pre-Requisite Check
### Do NOT start solution interviews until:
- [ ] Completed 10+ problem interviews
- [ ] Problem validation scorecard passes:
- [ ] >70% mentioned problem unprompted
- [ ] Average severity >7/10
- [ ] >30% actively seeking solutions
- [ ] Clear problem statement documented
- [ ] Target persona defined
### Why This Matters
If you test solutions without validated problems, you'll get:
- False positives ("sure, that looks nice")
- No ability to connect solution to real pain
- Wasted time building the wrong thing
### Problem Summary for This Interview
**Validated Problem:** ________________________________
**Severity Score:** __/10
**Who Has It:** [Persona description]
**What They Do Today:** [Current solution]
```
---
### Step 2: Create Your Solution Demo
```
## What to Demo
### Fidelity Levels
| Level | What It Is | When to Use | Time to Create |
|-------|------------|-------------|----------------|
| **Concept** | Verbal description + whiteboard | Very early, exploring directions | 30 min |
| **Paper** | Sketches, wireframes | Early concept validation | 2-4 hours |
| **Clickable** | Figma/InVision prototype | Testing workflows and features | 1-2 days |
| **Wizard of Oz** | Human behind the curtain | Testing value prop before building | 1-3 days |
| **Concierge** | You do it manually for them | Testing if solution works at all | 1+ week |
| **MVP** | Basic working product | Testing if they'll pay | 2+ weeks |
### What to Show
**DO Show:**
- Core value proposition in action
- The main workflow/interaction
- How it solves their specific problem
- Just enough to get a reaction
**DON'T Show:**
- Every feature you plan to build
- Polished design (distracts from function)
- Pricing (usually—test separately)
- Your roadmap (creates false expectations)
### Demo Script Template
"Before I show you anything, let me make sure I understand your problem.
[Recap validated problem in their words]
Does that sound right? [Confirm]
What I want to show you is rough—it's not a real product yet.
I'm interested in your honest reaction, even if it's negative.
The worst thing you could do is be polite.
[Demo the core concept - 2-3 minutes max]
Now I want to understand your reaction..."
```
---
### Step 3: Run the Solution Interview
```
## Solution Interview Structure (30-45 minutes)
### Part 1: Problem Recap (5 min)
"Last time we talked about [problem]. Since then, has anything changed?"
"What have you tried to solve this?"
Goal: Re-anchor to the problem, confirm it's still relevant
### Part 2: Solution Demo (5-10 min)
"I want to show you something we're exploring..."
[Demo core concept]
"What's your initial reaction?"
Goal: Present solution, capture immediate reaction
### Part 3: Feedback Deep Dive (15-20 min)
"What stood out to you?"
"What concerns you?"
"What's missing?"
"How would this fit into your current workflow?"
Goal: Understand fit, gaps, objections
### Part 4: Comparison to Current (5 min)
"How does this compare to what you do today?"
"Would this replace [current solution] or add to it?"
"What would have to be true for you to switch?"
Goal: Understand switching behavior
### Part 5: Commitment Testing (5 min)
"If this existed today, what would you do?"
"Would you be willing to try an early version?"
"What would it be worth to you if it worked?"
Goal: Test real interest with commitment asks
### Part 6: Next Steps (2 min)
"Can I follow up when we have something more complete?"
"Who else should I show this to?"
Goal: Get permission for follow-up, referrals
```
---
### Step 4: Key Questions by Interview Phase
```
## Solution Interview Questions
### Reaction Questions (Initial)
- "What's your first reaction?"
- "What stood out to you?"
- "What surprised you?"
- "What concerned you?"
**Watch for:**
- Immediate positive vs. confused
- Questions they ask (what do they care about?)
- Body language (leaning in vs. back)
### Understanding Questions (Comprehension)
- "In your own words, what does this do?"
- "How would you explain this to a colleague?"
- "What problem does this solve?"
**Red flags:**
- They can't explain it = too complex
- They describe it differently than intended = messaging problem
- They describe features, not benefits = not connecting to their problem
### Fit Questions (Solution-Problem Fit)
- "Does this solve the problem we discussed?"
- "What would be different about your day/week if you had this?"
- "Where does this fit in your current workflow?"
- "What would you stop doing if you had this?"
**Strong signals:**
- They can immediately see where it fits
- They describe specific situations it would help
- They identify things they'd stop doing (replacing current behavior)
### Gap Questions (What's Missing)
- "What's missing?"
- "What would prevent you from using this?"
- "What would make this a no-brainer?"
- "What's the most important thing we should build first?"
**Listen for:**
- Must-have features vs. nice-to-haves
- Deal-breaker gaps
- Unexpected use cases
### Concern Questions (Objections)
- "What worries you about this?"
- "What could go wrong?"
- "What would your [boss/team/IT] think?"
**Listen for:**
- Technical concerns (security, integrations)
- Organizational concerns (adoption, approval)
- Personal concerns (learning curve, change)
### Comparison Questions (vs. Alternatives)
- "How does this Related in Design
contribute
IncludedLocal-only OSS contribution command center. Auto-refreshes the user's in-flight PR and issue state on invoke so conversations start with full context — no need to brief Claude on what's in flight. Helps the user find issues to contribute to on GitHub, builds per-repo dossiers of what each upstream expects (CLA, DCO, branch convention, AI policy, draft-first, review bots, issue templates), runs deterministic gates before any external action so AI-assisted contributions don't reach maintainers as slop. State is markdown-only: candidate files at ~/.contribute-system/candidates/, repo dossiers at ~/.contribute-system/research/, append-only event log at ~/.contribute-system/log.jsonl. No database, no cloud calls. Use when the user asks about their PRs / issues / contributions, wants to find new work to take on, claim an issue, build/refresh a repo's dossier, or draft a Design Issue or PR. Trigger with "/contribute", "what's my PR status", "find a contribution", "claim issue X", "draft a Design Issue for Y", "refresh dossier for Z".
architectural-analysis
IncludedUser-triggered deep architectural analysis of a codebase or scoped subtree across eight modes — information architecture, data flow, integration points, UI surfaces, interaction patterns, data model, control flow, and failure modes. This skill should be used when the user asks to "diagram this codebase," "map the architecture," "show the data flow," "give me an ERD," "trace control flow," "find the integration points," "verify the layout pattern," "audit the UX architecture," or any similar request whose primary deliverable is mermaid diagrams plus cited reports under docs/architecture/. Dispatches haiku/sonnet sub-agents in parallel for per-mode exploration, then verifies every citation mechanically before any node lands in a diagram. Not for one-off prose explanations of code (use code-explanation) or for high-level system design from scratch (use system-design).
mcp
IncludedModel Context Protocol (MCP) server development and tool management. Languages: Python, TypeScript. Capabilities: build MCP servers, integrate external APIs, discover/execute MCP tools, manage multi-server configs, design agent-centric tools. Actions: create, build, integrate, discover, execute, configure MCP servers/tools. Keywords: MCP, Model Context Protocol, MCP server, MCP tool, stdio transport, SSE transport, tool discovery, resource provider, prompt template, external API integration, Gemini CLI MCP, Claude MCP, agent tools, tool execution, server config. Use when: building MCP servers, integrating external APIs as MCP tools, discovering available MCP tools, executing MCP capabilities, configuring multi-server setups, designing tools for AI agents.
react-native-skia
IncludedDesign, build, debug, and optimise high-polish animated graphics in React Native or Expo using @shopify/react-native-skia, Reanimated, and Gesture Handler. Use when the user wants canvas-driven UI, shaders, paths, rich text, image filters, sprite fields, Skottie, video frames, snapshots, web CanvasKit setup, or performance tuning for custom motion-heavy elements such as loaders, hero art, cards, charts, progress indicators, particle systems, or gesture-driven surfaces. Also use when the user asks for fluid, glow, glass, blob, parallax, 60fps/120fps, or GPU-friendly animated effects in React Native, even if they do not explicitly say "Skia". Do not use for ordinary form/layout work with standard views.
plaid
IncludedProduct Led AI Development — guides founders from idea to launched product. Six capabilities: Idea (discover a product idea), Validate (pressure-test the idea against fatal flaws, problem reality, competition, and 2-week MVP feasibility), Plan (vision intake + document generation), Design (translate image references into a design.md spec), Launch (go-to-market strategy), and Build (roadmap execution). Use when someone says "PLAID", "plaid idea", "help me find an idea", "product idea", "idea from my business", "idea from my expertise", "plaid validate", "validate my idea", "pressure-test", "is this idea good", "find fatal flaws", "validate the problem", "plan a product", "define my vision", "generate a PRD", "product strategy", "plaid design", "design from image", "translate image to design", "create design.md", "extract design tokens", "plaid launch", "go-to-market", "launch plan", "GTM strategy", "launch playbook", "plaid build", "build the app", "start building", or "execute the roadmap".
nextjs-framer-motion-animations
IncludedAdds production-safe Motion for React or Framer Motion animations to Next.js apps, including reveal, hover and tap micro-interactions, whileInView, stagger, AnimatePresence, layout and layoutId transitions, reorder, scroll-linked UI, and lightweight route-content transitions. Use when the user asks to add, refactor, or debug Motion or Framer Motion in App Router or Pages Router codebases, especially around server/client boundaries, reduced motion, LazyMotion, bundle size, hydration, or route transitions. Avoid for GSAP-style timelines, WebGL or 3D scenes, heavy scroll storytelling, or CSS-only effects unless Motion is explicitly requested.