start
Internal conversation-entry router for Claude Code. Performs a lightweight intake pass at the start of substantive work: decide whether a more specific skill should be invoked first, whether specialized agent delegation is warranted, how much context is actually needed, and whether the task needs planning or can proceed directly. Not a user-facing slash command.
What this skill does
<EXTREMELY-IMPORTANT> This skill is a lightweight router, not a universal constitution. Non-negotiable rules: 1. If a more specific skill matches, invoke it before giving a substantive task response. 2. Keep intake lightweight. Do not enumerate all skills, agents, and plugins unless the user explicitly asks for a capability inventory. 3. Gather only the minimum context needed to avoid blind edits or duplicated work. 4. Delegate to a specialized agent only when domain expertise or isolation materially improves the result. 5. Use planning and task tracking only when the work is genuinely multi-step, risky, or ambiguous. </EXTREMELY-IMPORTANT> # Start ## Goal Choose the next best execution path at the beginning of a task with minimal prompt overhead. This skill should answer four questions quickly: 1. Is a more specific skill the real workflow? 2. Is specialized agent delegation warranted? 3. What is the minimum context needed before acting? 4. Does the task need planning, or can it proceed directly? ## Step 1: Check for a more specific skill Match the user request against domain and workflow skills first. - If a skill clearly applies, invoke it before explaining the approach. - If multiple skills may apply, choose the smallest set that covers the task. - If you are unsure whether a skill matches, read `references/skill_discovery_patterns.md`. - Do not perform full filesystem skill discovery on every task. Claude already exposes available skills and treats matching skill invocation as a first-class workflow. **Success criteria**: You either invoked the correct skill, or you can state concretely why no more specific skill applies. ## Step 2: Decide whether to delegate to a specialized agent Use an agent only when specialization or isolation changes the outcome materially. Delegate when: - the task is domain-heavy implementation, debugging, or review work - a specialized agent has clearly better heuristics for the stack - the work is large enough that ownership boundaries help Do not delegate when: - the work is a trivial read, search, or small direct edit - the task is only capability discovery - the next step depends on immediate local inspection If agent choice is unclear, read `references/agent_matching_logic.md`. **Success criteria**: You chose either direct execution or a specific agent for a concrete reason. ## Step 3: Gather minimum viable context Inspect only the code and files needed to avoid blind action. - Identify the likely files, modules, or subsystems involved. - Read surrounding code before editing. - Search for existing implementations or patterns before building from scratch. - Escalate to broader exploration only if the request is ambiguous or the code surface is unclear. Use `references/discovery.md` only when: - the user explicitly asks what skills, agents, or plugins are available - the environment appears out of sync with the file system - you need a capability inventory as the actual task output **Success criteria**: You have enough context to act without forcing broad discovery or redundant reading. ## Step 4: Choose planning depth Pick the smallest planning mechanism that keeps the work safe. - Direct execution: trivial, well-bounded requests - Light task tracking: several steps or files, but straightforward work - Full DAG planning: ambiguous, risky, architectural, or parallelizable work If planning is the real task, invoke `plan-to-task-list-with-dag` instead of turning `start` into a giant planner. **Success criteria**: The task has an execution shape that matches its real complexity. ## Step 5: Communicate the next move Give a concise first update that states: - what you think the user wants - what you are checking first - whether you are invoking another skill, delegating to an agent, or proceeding directly If delegating, pass: - clear scope - relevant context only - success criteria If executing directly, begin with the highest-value context step immediately after the update. **Success criteria**: The user can see the execution path without reading a long preamble. ## Guardrails - Do not announce a skill without invoking it. - Do not use `start` as a substitute for a real domain skill. - Do not force full capability discovery on normal task intake. - Do not sync `CLAUDE.md` as part of routine startup. - Do not create task-tracking noise for trivial work. - Do not delegate simple search or file-inspection work that should stay local. ## When To Load References - `references/skill_discovery_patterns.md` Use when unsure whether a skill applies, or when several skills overlap. - `references/agent_matching_logic.md` Use when unsure which specialized agent fits the task. - `references/discovery.md` Use only for explicit capability inventory or environment-drift checks. - `references/sync-claude-md.md` Use only when the user explicitly wants the capability section of `CLAUDE.md` refreshed and the session permits file edits. ## Output Contract On normal invocation, keep the first response short and concrete: 1. state the task understanding 2. state the next action 3. name the invoked skill or delegated agent if one is being used This skill succeeds when it routes cleanly and then gets out of the way.
Related in AI Agents
skill-development
IncludedComprehensive meta-skill for creating, managing, validating, auditing, and distributing Claude Code skills and slash commands (unified in v2.1.3+). Provides skill templates, creation workflows, validation patterns, audit checklists, naming conventions, YAML frontmatter guidance, progressive disclosure examples, and best practices lookup. Use when creating new skills, validating existing skills, auditing skill quality, understanding skill architecture, needing skill templates, learning about YAML frontmatter requirements, progressive disclosure patterns, tool restrictions (allowed-tools), skill composition, skill naming conventions, troubleshooting skill activation issues, creating custom slash commands, configuring command frontmatter, using command arguments ($ARGUMENTS, $1, $2), bash execution in commands, file references in commands, command namespacing, plugin commands, MCP slash commands, Skill tool configuration, or deciding between skills vs slash commands. Delegates to docs-management skill for official documentation.
reprompter
IncludedTransform messy prompts into well-structured, effective prompts — single or multi-agent. Use when: "reprompt", "reprompt this", "clean up this prompt", "structure my prompt", rough text needing XML tags and best practices, "reprompter teams", "repromptception", "run with quality", "smart run", "smart agents", multi-agent tasks, audits, parallel work, anything going to agent teams. Don't use when: simple Q&A, pure chat, immediate execution-only tasks. See "Don't Use When" section for details. Outputs: Structured XML/Markdown prompt, quality score (before/after), optional team brief + per-agent sub-prompts, agent team output files. Success criteria: Single mode quality score ≥ 7/10; Repromptception per-agent prompt quality score 8+/10; all required sections present, actionable and specific.
adaptive-compaction
IncludedAdaptive add-on policy and recovery layer that decides WHEN to compact, prune, snapshot, or fork -- replacing fixed-percent auto-compaction across Claude Code, Codex, and MCP-capable hosts. Trigger on auto-compact timing or damage: "when should I compact", "is it safe to compact now or start a fresh session", "auto-compact fires too early/mid-task", "switching to an unrelated task but the window still has space", "context rot", "answers get worse the longer the session runs", "the agent forgot the plan or my decisions after it summarized", "add a layer on top that manages context without changing the agent", raising autoCompactWindow to give the policy room, or installing/tuning a cross-tool compaction policy or PreCompact hook -- even when "compaction" is never said but the problem is context-window pressure or post-summarization memory loss. Do NOT use to summarize a conversation, build RAG, write a summarization prompt (decides WHEN not HOW), or answer max-context-length trivia.
agent-skill-creator
IncludedCreate cross-platform agent skills from workflow descriptions. Activates when users ask to create an agent, automate a repetitive workflow, create a custom skill, or need advanced agent creation. Triggers on phrases like create agent for, automate workflow, create skill for, every day I have to, daily I need to, turn process into agent, need to automate, create a cross-platform skill, validate this skill, export this skill, migrate this skill. Supports single skills, multi-agent suites, transcript processing, template-based creation, interactive configuration, cross-platform export, and spec validation.
llm-wiki
IncludedUse when building or maintaining a persistent personal knowledge base (second brain) in Obsidian where an LLM incrementally ingests sources, updates entity/concept pages, maintains cross-references, and keeps a synthesis current. Triggers include "second brain", "Obsidian wiki", "personal knowledge management", "ingest this paper/article/book", "build a research wiki", "compound knowledge", "Memex", or whenever the user wants knowledge to accumulate across sessions instead of being re-derived by RAG on every query.
skill-master
IncludedAgent Skills authoring, evaluation, and optimization. Create, edit, validate, benchmark, and improve skills following the agentskills.io specification. Use when designing SKILL.md files, structuring skill folders (references, scripts, assets), ingesting external documentation into skills, running trigger evals, benchmarking skill quality, optimizing descriptions, or performing blind A/B comparisons. Keywords: agentskills.io, SKILL.md, skill authoring, eval, benchmark, trigger optimization.