strategic-reading
Read a book, article, transcript, or case study through the lens of a specific strategic problem you're facing. Produces an applied playbook that maps the source onto the problem and gives short/medium/long-term recommendations. NOT for general book summaries.
What this skill does
# strategic-reading — Applied Analysis from Source Texts > **Convention:** see [conventions/quality.md](../conventions/quality.md) for > citation rules (every recommendation cites the source) and back-link > enforcement. > > **Convention:** see [_brain-filing-rules.md](../_brain-filing-rules.md) — > output files by primary subject (concepts/ for general strategy, projects/ > for problem-tied playbooks). ## What this is Take a large text PLUS a specific strategic problem, produce analysis that maps the text's insights onto the problem. This is not book summarization. This is reading with a mission. Where `book-mirror` personalizes a book to the reader's whole life, `strategic-reading` personalizes it to ONE current problem. Same shape (extract → analyze → mirror), different lens. **Canonical example:** a power-dynamics history book read against a specific gatekeeper-vs-incumbent fight, producing a tactical analysis that maps the book's playbook onto the situation with counter-tactics and a short/medium/long-term playbook. ## Inputs 1. **Source text** — book (EPUB/PDF), article, transcript, historical case study, any large document. 2. **Strategic problem** — the specific situation to analyze through the lens of the text. The user describes this explicitly or it's obvious from context. ## Output The brain page is the artifact. PDF is a rendering, never primary. ### Brain page structure ```markdown # [Source Title] — Applied to [Problem] > One-paragraph executive summary: how the source maps to the situation, > the key insight, the bottom line. ## The Core Parallel How the source's central dynamic maps onto the user's situation. ## Chapter / Section Triage For each major section of the source: - 2-3 sentence summary of what it says - Relevance to the problem: HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW - One directly applicable quote (if any) ## The Source's Playbook The author's framework, tactics, or strategies — organized as: - What the protagonist DID (tactics) - What WORKED and why - What FAILED and why - What OPPONENTS did that was effective ## Counter-Tactics Specific moves from the source that map to the user's situation: - What to DO (with source evidence) - What to AVOID (with source evidence) - What to WATCH FOR (warning signs from the source) ## Applied Playbook The synthesis — actionable recommendations: - **Short-term** (this week / this month) - **Medium-term** (this quarter) - **Long-term** (this year+) ## Key Quotes Direct quotes from the source that are devastatingly relevant. Maximum 5-10. Quality over quantity. ## See Also Links to relevant brain pages (related concepts, related projects). ``` ## Process ``` Phase 1: Ingest the source ├── EPUB: extract chapters via BeautifulSoup (see book-mirror SKILL.md │ for the extraction pipeline) ├── PDF: pdftotext -layout ├── Article: web_fetch └── Identify Table of Contents and total size. Phase 2: Triage chapters ├── Read first 2000 chars of each chapter. ├── Classify relevance to the problem (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW). └── HIGH chapters get full reads. MEDIUM partial. LOW skipped. Phase 3: Deep read HIGH chapters ├── Tactics and strategies used. ├── Power dynamics and how they shifted. ├── Specific quotes that map to the problem. └── Moments where the protagonist's approach succeeded or failed. Phase 4: Synthesize ├── Map source insights onto the specific problem. ├── Build the playbook (do / avoid / watch for). ├── Generate short/medium/long-term recommendations. └── Select the most devastating quotes. Phase 5: Write and deliver ├── Write the brain page at the right location: │ • If problem-specific: projects/<slug>/playbook.md │ • If general strategy: concepts/<slug>.md ├── put_page via the standard CLI flow. └── Optional: render to PDF via skills/brain-pdf. ``` ## Quality bar - **Every recommendation must cite the source.** Don't say "go direct to the mayor" — say "go direct to the mayor, because when the protagonist refused to be intimidated by a resignation threat (Ch 48), the bluff that worked on five mayors finally failed." - **Direct quotes are mandatory.** The source's own words carry more weight than paraphrase. - **The analysis must be actionable.** Not "this is interesting" but "do this, avoid that, watch for this." - **Short/medium/long-term breakdown is mandatory.** The user needs to know what to do tomorrow AND what to do this year. ## What this skill is NOT - Not a book summary tool. Use a different skill (or `book-mirror` for personalized analysis) for general summaries. - Not a research tool. Use `perplexity-research` for finding new information about a topic. - Not academic literary analysis. No one cares about literary merit — only strategic application. ## Related skills - `skills/book-mirror/SKILL.md` — book personalized to whole life (vs problem) - `skills/perplexity-research/SKILL.md` — current-intel cross-reference for fresh data - `skills/conventions/quality.md` — citation + back-link rules ## Contract This skill guarantees: - Routing matches the canonical triggers in the frontmatter. - Output written under the directories listed in `writes_to:` (when applicable). - Conventions referenced (`quality.md`, `brain-first.md`, `_brain-filing-rules.md`) are followed. - Privacy contract preserved: no real names, no fork-specific filesystem path literals, no upstream-fork references. The full behavior contract is documented in the body sections above; this section exists for the conformance test. ## Output Format The skill's output shape is documented inline in the body sections above (see "Output", "Brain page format", or equivalent). The literal section header here exists for the conformance test (`test/skills-conformance.test.ts`). ## Anti-Patterns The full anti-pattern list is in the body sections above; this header exists for the conformance test if the body uses a different casing.
Related in Writing & Docs
jax-development
IncludedUse this skill when the user is writing, debugging, profiling, refactoring, reviewing, benchmarking, parallelising, exporting, or explaining JAX code, or when they mention JAX, jax.numpy, jit, grad, value_and_grad, vmap, scan, lax, random keys, pytrees, jax.Array, sharding, Mesh, PartitionSpec, NamedSharding, pmap, shard_map, Pallas, XLA, StableHLO, checkify, profiler, or the JAX repo. It helps turn NumPy or PyTorch-style code into pure functional JAX, fix tracer/control-flow/shape/PRNG bugs, remove recompiles and host-device syncs, choose transforms and sharding strategies, inspect jaxpr/lowering/IR, and benchmark compiled code correctly.
nature-article-writer
IncludedDrafts, rewrites, diagnostically critiques, and style-calibrates primary research manuscripts for Nature and Nature Portfolio journals. Use when the user wants a Nature-style title, summary paragraph or abstract, introduction, results, discussion, methods, figure legends, presubmission enquiry, cover letter, reviewer response, or when a scientific draft sounds generic, jargon-heavy, structurally weak, or AI-ish and needs precise, broad-reader-friendly prose without inventing data, analyses, or references. Best for primary research articles and letters rather than reviews or press releases unless explicitly adapting one.
deckrd
IncludedDocument-driven framework that derives requirements, specifications, implementation plans, and executable tasks from goals through structured AI dialogue. Use when user says "write requirements", "create spec", "plan implementation", "derive tasks", "structure this feature", "break down into tasks", or "document this module". Also use for reverse engineering existing code into docs (/deckrd rev). Do NOT use for direct code writing — use /deckrd-coder after tasks are generated. Do NOT use when the user only wants to run or fix existing code without planning.
clinical-decision-support
IncludedGenerate professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical and clinical research settings, including patient cohort analyses (biomarker-stratified with outcomes) and treatment recommendation reports (evidence-based guidelines with decision algorithms). Supports GRADE evidence grading, statistical analysis (hazard ratios, survival curves, waterfall plots), biomarker integration, and regulatory compliance. Outputs publication-ready LaTeX/PDF format optimized for drug development, clinical research, and evidence synthesis.
handling-sf-data
IncludedSalesforce data operations with 130-point scoring. Use this skill to create, update, delete, bulk import/export, generate test data, and clean up org records using sf CLI and anonymous Apex. TRIGGER when: user creates test data, performs bulk import/export, uses sf data CLI commands, needs data factory patterns for Apex tests, or needs to seed/clean records in a Salesforce org. DO NOT TRIGGER when: SOQL query writing only (use querying-soql), Apex test execution (use running-apex-tests), or metadata deployment (use deploying-metadata).
accelint-ac-to-playwright
IncludedConvert and validate acceptance criteria for Playwright test automation. Use when user asks to (1) review/evaluate/check if AC are ready for automation, (2) assess if AC can be converted as-is, (3) validate AC quality for Playwright, (4) turn AC into tests, (5) generate tests from acceptance criteria, (6) convert .md bullets or .feature Gherkin files to Playwright specs, (7) create test automation from requirements. Handles both bullet-style markdown and Gherkin syntax with JSON test plan generation and validation.