Claude
Skills
Sign in
Back

style

Included with Lifetime
$97 forever

Elixir coding style and conventions. Use when writing idiomatic Elixir, avoiding bang functions in business logic, using pattern matching for error handling, or designing Ecto schemas as the single source of truth for data validation.

Writing & Docs

What this skill does


# Elixir Style and Conventions

## When to Activate

Activate when:
- Writing or reviewing Elixir code for idiomatic style
- Deciding between bang (`!`) and non-bang function variants
- Handling errors from external APIs, user input, or DB operations
- Designing Ecto schemas and changesets for validation
- Building Phoenix forms connected to changeset validation
- Chaining multi-step operations with `with` or `case`
- Choosing between `map.key` and `map[:key]` access patterns
- Implementing non-DB data structures (search forms, filter params)

This skill complements `elixir:anti-patterns` — that skill covers what to avoid; this one covers what to do instead.

## Tagged Tuples and Return Conventions

Elixir functions signal success or failure through return values, not exceptions.

**Standard return shapes:**

```elixir
# Two-element ok/error tuples (most common)
{:ok, result}
{:error, reason}

# Bare atoms for side-effect operations
:ok
:error

# Richer error tuples for typed failures
{:error, :not_found}
{:error, :unauthorized}
{:error, %Ecto.Changeset{}}
```

**Why this convention matters:**

Pattern matching on tagged tuples is the foundation of Elixir error handling. When every function in a call chain returns `{:ok, _}` or `{:error, _}`, `with` expressions can thread success values through and exit early on the first failure — without nested `if` or `try/rescue`.

```elixir
# Callers can match exhaustively
case fetch_user(id) do
  {:ok, user} -> render_profile(user)
  {:error, :not_found} -> send_resp(conn, 404, "Not found")
  {:error, reason} -> send_resp(conn, 500, inspect(reason))
end
```

## Logger over IO.puts

All application output goes through `Logger`. Do NOT use `IO.puts/1`, `IO.write/1`, or `:io.format/2` from application code. Logger respects log levels, supports metadata, and routes through the configured backends (console, file, structured log shippers). `IO.puts` writes directly to stdout regardless of log level and bypasses backend configuration.

```elixir
# WRONG — IO.puts("worker started")

# CORRECT
Logger.info("worker started")
Logger.info("worker started", worker_id: id, module: __MODULE__)
```

Flush concerns at shutdown go through Logger configuration (`Logger.flush/0` in an `at_exit`, or the `:logger_std_h` flush settings), not by bypassing Logger to write directly. The only legitimate use of `IO` in app code is reading from / writing to a specific IO device the user requested (e.g., a CLI tool's stdout output, where the OUTPUT IS the contract).

## Bang Functions: When to Avoid

### The Convention

Every standard library function with a `!` variant follows this contract:

| Non-bang | Bang |
|---|---|
| `File.read/1` → `{:ok, content}` or `{:error, reason}` | `File.read!/1` → `content` or raises |
| `Map.fetch/2` → `{:ok, value}` or `:error` | `Map.fetch!/2` → `value` or raises `KeyError` |
| `Repo.insert/1` → `{:ok, struct}` or `{:error, changeset}` | `Repo.insert!/1` → `struct` or raises |
| `Repo.get/2` → `struct` or `nil` | `Repo.get!/2` → `struct` or raises `Ecto.NoResultsError` |

### When Bangs Are Appropriate

Use bang functions when failure represents a programming error or an invalid system state that should crash loudly:

```elixir
# Application startup — missing config is a bug, not a user error
def start(_type, _args) do
  api_key = Application.fetch_env!(:my_app, :stripe_api_key)
  # ...
end

# Seeds and migrations — invalid data is a developer error
Repo.insert!(%User{email: "[email protected]", role: :admin})

# Pipelines operating on already-validated, known-good data
"hello world"
|> String.split()
|> Enum.map(&String.capitalize/1)
|> Enum.join(" ")

# Tests asserting expected state
user = Repo.get!(User, user_id)
```

### When to Avoid Bangs

Avoid bang functions wherever failure is a normal, expected outcome:

```elixir
# BAD: user input can always fail validation
def create_user(conn, %{"user" => params}) do
  user = Repo.insert!(%User{email: params["email"]})  # raises on validation failure
  json(conn, %{id: user.id})
end

# GOOD: handle the error path explicitly
def create_user(conn, %{"user" => params}) do
  case %User{} |> User.changeset(params) |> Repo.insert() do
    {:ok, user} -> json(conn, %{id: user.id})
    {:error, changeset} -> conn |> put_status(422) |> json(changeset_errors(changeset))
  end
end
```

```elixir
# BAD: external APIs can return 404, 500, network errors
def fetch_payment(payment_id) do
  Stripe.PaymentIntent.retrieve!(payment_id)  # raises on API error
end

# GOOD: return a tagged tuple, let the caller decide
def fetch_payment(payment_id) do
  case Stripe.PaymentIntent.retrieve(payment_id) do
    {:ok, payment} -> {:ok, payment}
    {:error, %{code: "resource_missing"}} -> {:error, :not_found}
    {:error, reason} -> {:error, reason}
  end
end
```

**Rule of thumb:** if a user action, external service, or DB constraint could cause the failure, use the non-bang variant and handle it.

## Pattern Matching for Error Handling

### `with` for Chaining Dependent Operations

Use `with` when multiple steps must all succeed, and any failure should short-circuit to an error response:

```elixir
def register_user(params) do
  with {:ok, validated} <- validate_registration_params(params),
       {:ok, user} <- create_user(validated),
       {:ok, _profile} <- create_default_profile(user),
       {:ok, _email} <- send_welcome_email(user) do
    {:ok, user}
  else
    {:error, %Ecto.Changeset{} = cs} -> {:error, {:validation_failed, cs}}
    {:error, :email_unavailable} -> {:error, :email_taken}
    {:error, reason} -> {:error, reason}
  end
end
```

The `else` block is optional. Without it, unmatched patterns in `with` clauses propagate the first failing value as the return value of the entire expression.

**Keep `with` flat.** Nesting `with` inside `with` is a sign the function is doing too much:

```elixir
# BAD: nested with — hard to follow
with {:ok, user} <- fetch_user(id) do
  with {:ok, order} <- fetch_order(user, order_id) do
    {:ok, {user, order}}
  end
end

# GOOD: flat with
with {:ok, user} <- fetch_user(id),
     {:ok, order} <- fetch_order(user, order_id) do
  {:ok, {user, order}}
end
```

### `case` for Single-Expression Branching

Use `case` when branching on one expression with multiple outcomes:

```elixir
def handle_webhook(event_type, payload) do
  case event_type do
    "payment.succeeded" -> handle_payment_succeeded(payload)
    "payment.failed" -> handle_payment_failed(payload)
    "customer.created" -> handle_customer_created(payload)
    unknown -> Logger.warning("Unhandled webhook: #{unknown}")
  end
end
```

### Multi-Clause Function Heads

Use multi-clause functions for structural dispatch — matching on the shape or value of arguments:

```elixir
defmodule MyApp.Notifier do
  def notify(%User{email: nil} = user, _message) do
    Logger.warning("No email for user #{user.id}, skipping notification")
    {:error, :no_email}
  end

  def notify(%User{} = user, message) do
    Mailer.deliver(to: user.email, body: message)
  end

  def notify({:admin, email}, message) do
    Mailer.deliver(to: email, subject: "[ADMIN] " <> message.subject, body: message)
  end
end
```

### Avoid `try/rescue` for Expected Errors

`try/rescue` is reserved for exceptions from code outside your control (third-party libraries that raise instead of returning error tuples). It is not idiomatic for expected application errors:

```elixir
# BAD: using rescue for control flow
def parse_integer(str) do
  try do
    {:ok, String.to_integer(str)}
  rescue
    ArgumentError -> {:error, :invalid_integer}
  end
end

# GOOD: use functions that return ok/error tuples
def parse_integer(str) do
  case Integer.parse(str) do
    {value, ""} -> {:ok, value}
    _ -> {:error, :invalid_integer}
  end
end
```

## Ecto as Data Shape Gatekeeper

### The Principle

Validate data once, at the changeset layer. Do not duplicate validation logic in controllers, LiveView callbacks, or service modules.

```
S

Related in Writing & Docs