task-to-agent-matcher
Matches tasks to appropriate agents by analyzing task requirements and finding agents with matching capabilities. Use when you need to assign tasks to agents or determine which agent should handle a task. Considers task type, requirements, and agent capabilities.
What this skill does
# Task-to-Agent Matcher Skill ## Instructions 1. Analyze the task to understand requirements 2. Identify task type and key requirements 3. Review available agents and their capabilities 4. Match task requirements to agent capabilities 5. Rank agents by suitability 6. Recommend best agent(s) for the task 7. Identify if new agent is needed ## Matching Process ### Step 1: Analyze Task - Read task description, requirements, and acceptance criteria - Identify task type (Design, Implementation, Infrastructure, Testing, etc.) - Extract key requirements and capabilities needed - Note any special requirements or constraints ### Step 2: Identify Task Characteristics - **Task Type**: Design, Implementation, Infrastructure, Testing, Documentation, etc. - **Domain**: Frontend, Backend, Database, DevOps, Security, etc. - **Complexity**: Simple, Medium, Complex - **Special Requirements**: Accessibility, Performance, Security, etc. ### Step 3: Review Available Agents - List all available agents from `.cursor/agents/` directory - For each agent, understand their capabilities - Use agent-capability-assessor if needed for detailed assessment ### Step 4: Match Tasks to Agents - Compare task requirements to each agent's capabilities - Score each agent on match quality - Consider both capability match and workflow fit ### Step 5: Make Recommendation - Rank agents by suitability - Recommend best agent(s) - Identify if new agent is needed - Note any gaps or concerns ## Matching Criteria ### Task Type Matching **Design Tasks** → `ui-ux-designer` - UI/UX design work - Component design - Layout design - Design system work **Implementation Tasks** → `implementation-engineer` - Code implementation - Feature development - API endpoints - Component implementation **Infrastructure Tasks** → `infrastructure-engineer` - Database setup - Deployment - CI/CD - Environment configuration **Specification Tasks** → `specification-writer` - Creating specifications - Requirements analysis - Technical planning **Task Breakdown** → `scrum-master` - Breaking down specifications - Creating task lists - Dependency management **Code Review** → `code-reviewer` or `code-reviewer-feedback` - Reviewing code - Providing feedback **Testing Tasks** → `test-runner` or `test-writer` - Running tests - Writing tests **Documentation Tasks** → `documentation` - Creating documentation - Writing docs ### Domain Matching **Frontend** → `ui-ux-designer`, `implementation-engineer` (for frontend) **Backend** → `implementation-engineer` (for backend), `api-implementer` **Database** → `infrastructure-engineer`, `database-implementer` **DevOps** → `infrastructure-engineer` **Security** → `security-auditor` **Accessibility** → `ui-ux-designer` (design), accessibility skills ## Matching Output Format ```markdown ## Task-to-Agent Matching ### Task: [Task ID and Title] **Type**: [Task Type] **Domain**: [Domain] **Complexity**: [Complexity] ### Task Requirements - [Requirement 1] - [Requirement 2] - [Requirement 3] ### Agent Matches #### 1. [Agent Name] - [Match Quality] **Match Score**: [Excellent/Good/Fair/Poor] **Capabilities**: - [Capability 1] - [Capability 2] **Why This Match**: [Explanation of why this agent matches] **Gaps/Concerns**: [Any gaps or concerns] #### 2. [Agent Name] - [Match Quality] [Similar format] ### Recommendation **Best Match**: [Agent Name] **Alternative**: [Alternative Agent] (if applicable) **New Agent Needed**: [Yes/No] **Rationale**: [Why this recommendation] ``` ## Examples ### Example 1: Clear Match **Input**: Match task "TASK-010: Style the submit button" **Output**: ```markdown ## Task-to-Agent Matching ### Task: TASK-010: Style the submit button **Type**: Implementation (Design needed first) **Domain**: Frontend **Complexity**: Simple ### Task Requirements - Create button styling - Implement design specifications - Ensure accessibility - Add responsive design ### Agent Matches #### 1. ui-ux-designer - Excellent Match **Match Score**: Excellent **Capabilities**: - Creates design specifications - Designs UI components - Considers accessibility - Plans responsive design **Why This Match**: This task needs design specifications first. ui-ux-designer specializes in creating design specs for components like buttons, including accessibility and responsive considerations. **Gaps/Concerns**: None #### 2. implementation-engineer - Good Match (after design) **Match Score**: Good **Capabilities**: - Implements design specs - Handles frontend implementation - Ensures code quality **Why This Match**: After design is complete, implementation-engineer would implement the button styling according to design specs. **Gaps/Concerns**: Requires design specs first ### Recommendation **Best Match**: ui-ux-designer (for design), then implementation-engineer (for implementation) **New Agent Needed**: No **Rationale**: This task requires both design and implementation. ui-ux-designer should create design specs first, then implementation-engineer should implement them. ``` ### Example 2: Multiple Options **Input**: Match task "TASK-015: Set up PostgreSQL database with user and task tables" **Output**: ```markdown ## Task-to-Agent Matching ### Task: TASK-015: Set up PostgreSQL database with user and task tables **Type**: Infrastructure **Domain**: Database **Complexity**: Medium ### Task Requirements - Set up PostgreSQL database - Create database schema - Create user and task tables - Set up migrations - Configure database connection ### Agent Matches #### 1. infrastructure-engineer - Excellent Match **Match Score**: Excellent **Capabilities**: - Handles infrastructure tasks - Sets up databases - Creates database schemas - Handles deployment and configuration **Why This Match**: infrastructure-engineer specializes in infrastructure tasks including database setup, schema creation, and configuration. **Gaps/Concerns**: None #### 2. database-implementer (skill) - Good Match **Match Score**: Good **Capabilities**: - Creates database schemas - Handles migrations - Creates data access layers **Why This Match**: The database-implementer skill provides database-specific capabilities, but would need to be used by an agent like infrastructure-engineer. **Gaps/Concerns**: This is a skill, not an agent. Needs to be used by an agent. ### Recommendation **Best Match**: infrastructure-engineer **New Agent Needed**: No **Rationale**: infrastructure-engineer is the best match for database infrastructure tasks. It can use the database-implementer skill for detailed database work. ``` ### Example 3: New Agent Needed **Input**: Match task "TASK-020: Create machine learning model for image classification" **Output**: ```markdown ## Task-to-Agent Matching ### Task: TASK-020: Create machine learning model for image classification **Type**: Implementation **Domain**: Machine Learning / AI **Complexity**: High ### Task Requirements - Design ML model architecture - Train image classification model - Evaluate model performance - Deploy model ### Agent Matches #### 1. implementation-engineer - Poor Match **Match Score**: Poor **Capabilities**: - General code implementation - API and backend work - Standard software development **Why This Match**: Implementation-engineer handles general implementation but doesn't specialize in machine learning. **Gaps/Concerns**: - Lacks ML-specific knowledge - No ML model training experience - No ML deployment expertise #### 2. No other existing agents match ### Recommendation **Best Match**: None (new agent needed) **New Agent Needed**: Yes **Rationale**: This task requires specialized machine learning capabilities that no existing agent has. A new ML-engineer or data-scientist agent should be created to handle this task effectively. ``` ## Multi-Task Matching When matching multiple tasks: 1. Match each task individually 2. Consider agent workload 3. Optimize assignments 4. Identify patterns ```markdown ## Multi-Task Agent Matching
Related in AI Agents
skill-development
IncludedComprehensive meta-skill for creating, managing, validating, auditing, and distributing Claude Code skills and slash commands (unified in v2.1.3+). Provides skill templates, creation workflows, validation patterns, audit checklists, naming conventions, YAML frontmatter guidance, progressive disclosure examples, and best practices lookup. Use when creating new skills, validating existing skills, auditing skill quality, understanding skill architecture, needing skill templates, learning about YAML frontmatter requirements, progressive disclosure patterns, tool restrictions (allowed-tools), skill composition, skill naming conventions, troubleshooting skill activation issues, creating custom slash commands, configuring command frontmatter, using command arguments ($ARGUMENTS, $1, $2), bash execution in commands, file references in commands, command namespacing, plugin commands, MCP slash commands, Skill tool configuration, or deciding between skills vs slash commands. Delegates to docs-management skill for official documentation.
reprompter
IncludedTransform messy prompts into well-structured, effective prompts — single or multi-agent. Use when: "reprompt", "reprompt this", "clean up this prompt", "structure my prompt", rough text needing XML tags and best practices, "reprompter teams", "repromptception", "run with quality", "smart run", "smart agents", multi-agent tasks, audits, parallel work, anything going to agent teams. Don't use when: simple Q&A, pure chat, immediate execution-only tasks. See "Don't Use When" section for details. Outputs: Structured XML/Markdown prompt, quality score (before/after), optional team brief + per-agent sub-prompts, agent team output files. Success criteria: Single mode quality score ≥ 7/10; Repromptception per-agent prompt quality score 8+/10; all required sections present, actionable and specific.
adaptive-compaction
IncludedAdaptive add-on policy and recovery layer that decides WHEN to compact, prune, snapshot, or fork -- replacing fixed-percent auto-compaction across Claude Code, Codex, and MCP-capable hosts. Trigger on auto-compact timing or damage: "when should I compact", "is it safe to compact now or start a fresh session", "auto-compact fires too early/mid-task", "switching to an unrelated task but the window still has space", "context rot", "answers get worse the longer the session runs", "the agent forgot the plan or my decisions after it summarized", "add a layer on top that manages context without changing the agent", raising autoCompactWindow to give the policy room, or installing/tuning a cross-tool compaction policy or PreCompact hook -- even when "compaction" is never said but the problem is context-window pressure or post-summarization memory loss. Do NOT use to summarize a conversation, build RAG, write a summarization prompt (decides WHEN not HOW), or answer max-context-length trivia.
agent-skill-creator
IncludedCreate cross-platform agent skills from workflow descriptions. Activates when users ask to create an agent, automate a repetitive workflow, create a custom skill, or need advanced agent creation. Triggers on phrases like create agent for, automate workflow, create skill for, every day I have to, daily I need to, turn process into agent, need to automate, create a cross-platform skill, validate this skill, export this skill, migrate this skill. Supports single skills, multi-agent suites, transcript processing, template-based creation, interactive configuration, cross-platform export, and spec validation.
llm-wiki
IncludedUse when building or maintaining a persistent personal knowledge base (second brain) in Obsidian where an LLM incrementally ingests sources, updates entity/concept pages, maintains cross-references, and keeps a synthesis current. Triggers include "second brain", "Obsidian wiki", "personal knowledge management", "ingest this paper/article/book", "build a research wiki", "compound knowledge", "Memex", or whenever the user wants knowledge to accumulate across sessions instead of being re-derived by RAG on every query.
skill-master
IncludedAgent Skills authoring, evaluation, and optimization. Create, edit, validate, benchmark, and improve skills following the agentskills.io specification. Use when designing SKILL.md files, structuring skill folders (references, scripts, assets), ingesting external documentation into skills, running trigger evals, benchmarking skill quality, optimizing descriptions, or performing blind A/B comparisons. Keywords: agentskills.io, SKILL.md, skill authoring, eval, benchmark, trigger optimization.