tdd
Test-Driven Development workflow for ALL Prowler components (UI, SDK, API). Trigger: ALWAYS when implementing features, fixing bugs, or refactoring - regardless of component. This is a MANDATORY workflow, not optional.
What this skill does
## TDD Cycle (MANDATORY)
```text
+-----------------------------------------+
| RED -> GREEN -> REFACTOR |
| ^ | |
| +------------------------+ |
+-----------------------------------------+
```
The question is NOT "should I write tests?" but "what tests do I need?"
---
## The Three Laws of TDD
1. **No production code** until you have a failing test
2. **No more test** than necessary to fail
3. **No more code** than necessary to pass
---
## Detect Your Stack
Before starting, identify which component you're working on:
| Working in | Stack | Runner | Test pattern | Details |
|------------|-------|--------|-------------|---------|
| `ui/` | TypeScript / React | Vitest + RTL | `*.test.{ts,tsx}` (co-located) | See `vitest` skill |
| `prowler/` | Python | pytest + moto | `*_test.py` (suffix) in `tests/` | See `prowler-test-sdk` skill |
| `api/` | Python / Django | pytest + django | `test_*.py` (prefix) in `api/src/backend/**/tests/` | See `prowler-test-api` skill |
---
## Phase 0: Assessment (ALWAYS FIRST)
Before writing ANY code:
### UI (`ui/`)
```bash
# 1. Find existing tests
fd "*.test.tsx" ui/components/feature/
# 2. Check coverage
pnpm test:coverage -- components/feature/
# 3. Read existing tests
```
### SDK (`prowler/`)
```bash
# 1. Find existing tests
fd "*_test.py" tests/providers/aws/services/ec2/
# 2. Run specific test
uv run pytest tests/providers/aws/services/ec2/ec2_ami_public/ -v
# 3. Read existing tests
```
### API (`api/`)
```bash
# 1. Find existing tests
fd "test_*.py" api/src/backend/api/tests/
# 2. Run specific test
uv run pytest api/src/backend/api/tests/test_models.py -v
# 3. Read existing tests
```
### Decision Tree (All Stacks)
```text
+------------------------------------------+
| Does test file exist for this code? |
+----------+-----------------------+-------+
| NO | YES
v v
+------------------+ +------------------+
| CREATE test file | | Check coverage |
| -> Phase 1: RED | | for your change |
+------------------+ +--------+---------+
|
+--------+--------+
| Missing cases? |
+---+---------+---+
| YES | NO
v v
+-----------+ +-----------+
| ADD tests | | Proceed |
| Phase 1 | | Phase 2 |
+-----------+ +-----------+
```
---
## Phase 1: RED - Write Failing Tests
### For NEW Functionality
#### UI (Vitest)
```typescript
describe("PriceCalculator", () => {
it("should return 0 for quantities below threshold", () => {
// Given
const quantity = 3;
// When
const result = calculateDiscount(quantity);
// Then
expect(result).toBe(0);
});
});
```
#### SDK (pytest)
```python
class Test_ec2_ami_public:
@mock_aws
def test_no_public_amis(self):
# Given - No AMIs exist
aws_provider = set_mocked_aws_provider([AWS_REGION_US_EAST_1])
with mock.patch("prowler...ec2_service", new=EC2(aws_provider)):
from prowler...ec2_ami_public import ec2_ami_public
# When
check = ec2_ami_public()
result = check.execute()
# Then
assert len(result) == 0
```
#### API (pytest-django)
```python
@pytest.mark.django_db
class TestResourceModel:
def test_create_resource_with_tags(self, providers_fixture):
# Given
provider, *_ = providers_fixture
tenant_id = provider.tenant_id
# When
resource = Resource.objects.create(
tenant_id=tenant_id, provider=provider,
uid="arn:aws:ec2:us-east-1:123456789:instance/i-1234",
name="test", region="us-east-1", service="ec2", type="instance",
)
# Then
assert resource.uid == "arn:aws:ec2:us-east-1:123456789:instance/i-1234"
```
**Run -> MUST fail:** Test references code that doesn't exist yet.
### For BUG FIXES
Write a test that **reproduces the bug** first:
**UI:** `expect(() => render(<DatePicker value={null} />)).not.toThrow();`
**SDK:** `assert result[0].status == "FAIL" # Currently returns PASS incorrectly`
**API:** `assert response.status_code == 403 # Currently returns 200`
Run -> Should FAIL (reproducing the bug).
### For REFACTORING
Capture ALL current behavior BEFORE refactoring:
```text
# Any stack: run ALL existing tests, they should PASS
# This is your safety net - if any fail after refactoring, you broke something
```
Run -> All should PASS (baseline).
---
## Phase 2: GREEN - Minimum Code
Write the MINIMUM code to make the test pass. Hardcoding is valid for the first test.
**UI:**
```typescript
// Test expects calculateDiscount(100, 10) === 10
function calculateDiscount() {
return 10; // FAKE IT - hardcoded is valid for first test
}
```
**Python (SDK/API):**
```python
# Test expects check.execute() returns 0 results
def execute(self):
return [] # FAKE IT - hardcoded is valid for first test
```
**This passes. But we're not done...**
---
## Phase 3: Triangulation (CRITICAL)
**One test allows faking. Multiple tests FORCE real logic.**
Add tests with different inputs that break the hardcoded value:
| Scenario | Required? |
|----------|-----------|
| Happy path | YES |
| Zero/empty values | YES |
| Boundary values | YES |
| Different valid inputs | YES (breaks fake) |
| Error conditions | YES |
**UI:**
```typescript
it("should calculate 10% discount", () => {
expect(calculateDiscount(100, 10)).toBe(10);
});
// ADD - breaks the fake:
it("should calculate 15% on 200", () => {
expect(calculateDiscount(200, 15)).toBe(30);
});
it("should return 0 for 0% rate", () => {
expect(calculateDiscount(100, 0)).toBe(0);
});
```
**Python:**
```python
def test_single_public_ami(self):
# Different input -> breaks hardcoded empty list
assert len(result) == 1
assert result[0].status == "FAIL"
def test_private_ami(self):
assert result[0].status == "PASS"
```
**Now fake BREAKS -> Real implementation required.**
---
## Phase 4: REFACTOR
Tests GREEN -> Improve code quality WITHOUT changing behavior.
- Extract functions/methods
- Improve naming
- Add types/validation
- Reduce duplication
Run tests after EACH change -> Must stay GREEN.
---
## Quick Reference
```text
+------------------------------------------------+
| TDD WORKFLOW |
+------------------------------------------------+
| 0. ASSESS: What tests exist? What's missing? |
| |
| 1. RED: Write ONE failing test |
| +-- Run -> Must fail with clear error |
| |
| 2. GREEN: Write MINIMUM code to pass |
| +-- Fake It is valid for first test |
| |
| 3. TRIANGULATE: Add tests that break the fake |
| +-- Different inputs, edge cases |
| |
| 4. REFACTOR: Improve with confidence |
| +-- Tests stay green throughout |
| |
| 5. REPEAT: Next behavior/requirement |
+------------------------------------------------+
```
---
## Anti-Patterns (NEVER DO)
```python
# ANY language:
# 1. Code first, tests after
def new_feature(): ... # Then writing tests = USELESS
# 2. Skip triangulation
# Single test allows faking forever
# 3. Test implementation details
assert component.state.is_loading == True # BAD - test behavior, not internals
assert mock_service.call_count == 3 # BAD - brittle coupling
# 4. All tests at once before any code
# Write ONE test, make it pass, THEN write the next
# 5. Giant test methodsRelated in Design
contribute
IncludedLocal-only OSS contribution command center. Auto-refreshes the user's in-flight PR and issue state on invoke so conversations start with full context — no need to brief Claude on what's in flight. Helps the user find issues to contribute to on GitHub, builds per-repo dossiers of what each upstream expects (CLA, DCO, branch convention, AI policy, draft-first, review bots, issue templates), runs deterministic gates before any external action so AI-assisted contributions don't reach maintainers as slop. State is markdown-only: candidate files at ~/.contribute-system/candidates/, repo dossiers at ~/.contribute-system/research/, append-only event log at ~/.contribute-system/log.jsonl. No database, no cloud calls. Use when the user asks about their PRs / issues / contributions, wants to find new work to take on, claim an issue, build/refresh a repo's dossier, or draft a Design Issue or PR. Trigger with "/contribute", "what's my PR status", "find a contribution", "claim issue X", "draft a Design Issue for Y", "refresh dossier for Z".
architectural-analysis
IncludedUser-triggered deep architectural analysis of a codebase or scoped subtree across eight modes — information architecture, data flow, integration points, UI surfaces, interaction patterns, data model, control flow, and failure modes. This skill should be used when the user asks to "diagram this codebase," "map the architecture," "show the data flow," "give me an ERD," "trace control flow," "find the integration points," "verify the layout pattern," "audit the UX architecture," or any similar request whose primary deliverable is mermaid diagrams plus cited reports under docs/architecture/. Dispatches haiku/sonnet sub-agents in parallel for per-mode exploration, then verifies every citation mechanically before any node lands in a diagram. Not for one-off prose explanations of code (use code-explanation) or for high-level system design from scratch (use system-design).
mcp
IncludedModel Context Protocol (MCP) server development and tool management. Languages: Python, TypeScript. Capabilities: build MCP servers, integrate external APIs, discover/execute MCP tools, manage multi-server configs, design agent-centric tools. Actions: create, build, integrate, discover, execute, configure MCP servers/tools. Keywords: MCP, Model Context Protocol, MCP server, MCP tool, stdio transport, SSE transport, tool discovery, resource provider, prompt template, external API integration, Gemini CLI MCP, Claude MCP, agent tools, tool execution, server config. Use when: building MCP servers, integrating external APIs as MCP tools, discovering available MCP tools, executing MCP capabilities, configuring multi-server setups, designing tools for AI agents.
react-native-skia
IncludedDesign, build, debug, and optimise high-polish animated graphics in React Native or Expo using @shopify/react-native-skia, Reanimated, and Gesture Handler. Use when the user wants canvas-driven UI, shaders, paths, rich text, image filters, sprite fields, Skottie, video frames, snapshots, web CanvasKit setup, or performance tuning for custom motion-heavy elements such as loaders, hero art, cards, charts, progress indicators, particle systems, or gesture-driven surfaces. Also use when the user asks for fluid, glow, glass, blob, parallax, 60fps/120fps, or GPU-friendly animated effects in React Native, even if they do not explicitly say "Skia". Do not use for ordinary form/layout work with standard views.
plaid
IncludedProduct Led AI Development — guides founders from idea to launched product. Six capabilities: Idea (discover a product idea), Validate (pressure-test the idea against fatal flaws, problem reality, competition, and 2-week MVP feasibility), Plan (vision intake + document generation), Design (translate image references into a design.md spec), Launch (go-to-market strategy), and Build (roadmap execution). Use when someone says "PLAID", "plaid idea", "help me find an idea", "product idea", "idea from my business", "idea from my expertise", "plaid validate", "validate my idea", "pressure-test", "is this idea good", "find fatal flaws", "validate the problem", "plan a product", "define my vision", "generate a PRD", "product strategy", "plaid design", "design from image", "translate image to design", "create design.md", "extract design tokens", "plaid launch", "go-to-market", "launch plan", "GTM strategy", "launch playbook", "plaid build", "build the app", "start building", or "execute the roadmap".
nextjs-framer-motion-animations
IncludedAdds production-safe Motion for React or Framer Motion animations to Next.js apps, including reveal, hover and tap micro-interactions, whileInView, stagger, AnimatePresence, layout and layoutId transitions, reorder, scroll-linked UI, and lightweight route-content transitions. Use when the user asks to add, refactor, or debug Motion or Framer Motion in App Router or Pages Router codebases, especially around server/client boundaries, reduced motion, LazyMotion, bundle size, hydration, or route transitions. Avoid for GSAP-style timelines, WebGL or 3D scenes, heavy scroll storytelling, or CSS-only effects unless Motion is explicitly requested.