team-personas
Use when the user asks about personas for agent teams, deep behavioral profiles for teammates, the productivity loop, or any of the 8 named personas (Auditor, Architect, Analyst, Refiner, Compounder, Facilitator, Visionary, Realist). Triggers: "personas", "behavioral profiles", "productivity loop", "auditor persona", "architect persona", "analyst persona", "refiner persona", "compounder persona", "facilitator persona", "what personas are available", "how do personas work". Provides 8 reusable persona definitions that add deep methodology, scoring criteria, and interaction patterns to agent team teammates.
What this skill does
# Team Personas
Deep behavioral profiles that transform brief teammate role descriptions into structured, methodology-driven agents. While team blueprints define *what* each teammate does, personas define *how* they think, score, iterate, and interact.
## What Are Personas
A **persona** is a reusable behavioral profile that gives a teammate:
- **Structured methodology** — Named phases with specific steps and outputs
- **Scoring criteria** — Quantitative dimensions for evaluating work quality
- **Interaction patterns** — When to pause, check in, validate, and hand off
- **Input/output contracts** — What each persona consumes and produces
**Brief role description (blueprint-style):**
> Analyst — Review the architecture for quality, reliability, and performance issues.
**Persona-enhanced (full behavioral profile):**
> A Senior Engineering Analyst who evaluates through 4 sequential passes (Architecture → Code Quality → Reliability → Performance), rates each dimension 1-10 with specific evidence, produces a tradeoff matrix, and pauses after each pass to share findings before continuing.
Personas are optional — blueprints work fine with brief role descriptions. Use personas when you need consistent methodology, reproducible quality, or when a teammate's *process* matters as much as their output.
## The Productivity Loop
The 5 personas form a continuous improvement cycle where each persona's output feeds the next:
```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ │
│ ┌──────────┐ ┌───────────┐ ┌──────────┐ │
│ │ Auditor │───▶│ Architect │───▶│ Analyst │ │
│ │ Discover │ │ Design │ │ Review │ │
│ └──────────┘ └───────────┘ └──────────┘ │
│ ▲ │ │
│ │ ▼ │
│ ┌────────────┐ ┌──────────┐ │
│ │ Compounder │◀─────────────│ Refiner │ │
│ │ Compound │ │ Iterate │ │
│ └────────────┘ └──────────┘ │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
The loop is the mechanism. Individual personas produce good outputs; the loop compounds improvements over time because each cycle builds on the previous one's accumulated knowledge.
## Using Personas
### Mode 1: Full Productivity Team
Use all 5 personas together as a complete improvement cycle:
```
/spawn-create --mode productivity <workflow or process to optimize>
```
This spawns a sequential team where each persona's output feeds the next, culminating in a synthesis report with next-cycle recommendations.
### Mode 2: Individual Persona
Apply a single persona to any teammate in any blueprint. Include this in the teammate's spawn description:
```
Read the [Persona Name] persona definition at:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/team-personas/references/[name].md
Follow the methodology phases, scoring criteria, and behavioral instructions
defined in the persona. Your inputs come from [source] and your outputs
feed into [destination].
```
Replace `[name]` with the lowercase persona name: `auditor`, `architect`, `analyst`, `refiner`, `compounder`, `facilitator`, `visionary`, or `realist`.
### Mode 3: Custom Composition
Use the `team-architect` agent to design a custom team that mixes personas with ad-hoc roles:
```
Design a team for refactoring our auth module. I want the Architect persona
for the solution design and the Refiner persona for iterative improvement,
but regular teammates for the implementation work.
```
The team-architect agent knows about available personas and suggests applying them where a teammate needs specific methodology, scoring criteria, or interaction patterns.
## Two ways to deliver persona content to a teammate
| Approach | When | How |
|---|---|---|
| **Persona reference file** | The persona is reusable across spawns AND has consistent methodology (e.g., Auditor's 3-phase Discovery → Scoring → 4-Week Plan) | Teammate reads `references/<name>.md` at startup |
| **Rich inline role description** | The role is mode-specific and doesn't map to a reusable persona (e.g., planning's 7 mode-specific role compositions) | Role description is embedded directly in the spawn prompt |
The planning team uses rich inline descriptions because its 7 modes each need distinct role definitions. The productivity and brainstorming teams use persona reference files because their roles have consistent methodology across uses.
## Catalog & registry
The full catalog (titles, tags, loop positions) and the per-capability matching guide live in [registry.md](registry.md). Use the registry when designing custom teams via the team-architect agent.
The 8 persona reference files (auditor, architect, analyst, refiner, compounder, facilitator, visionary, realist) live in `references/` — each written in second-person ("You are...") so it can be directly injected into a teammate's behavioral context.
Related in AI Agents
skill-development
IncludedComprehensive meta-skill for creating, managing, validating, auditing, and distributing Claude Code skills and slash commands (unified in v2.1.3+). Provides skill templates, creation workflows, validation patterns, audit checklists, naming conventions, YAML frontmatter guidance, progressive disclosure examples, and best practices lookup. Use when creating new skills, validating existing skills, auditing skill quality, understanding skill architecture, needing skill templates, learning about YAML frontmatter requirements, progressive disclosure patterns, tool restrictions (allowed-tools), skill composition, skill naming conventions, troubleshooting skill activation issues, creating custom slash commands, configuring command frontmatter, using command arguments ($ARGUMENTS, $1, $2), bash execution in commands, file references in commands, command namespacing, plugin commands, MCP slash commands, Skill tool configuration, or deciding between skills vs slash commands. Delegates to docs-management skill for official documentation.
reprompter
IncludedTransform messy prompts into well-structured, effective prompts — single or multi-agent. Use when: "reprompt", "reprompt this", "clean up this prompt", "structure my prompt", rough text needing XML tags and best practices, "reprompter teams", "repromptception", "run with quality", "smart run", "smart agents", multi-agent tasks, audits, parallel work, anything going to agent teams. Don't use when: simple Q&A, pure chat, immediate execution-only tasks. See "Don't Use When" section for details. Outputs: Structured XML/Markdown prompt, quality score (before/after), optional team brief + per-agent sub-prompts, agent team output files. Success criteria: Single mode quality score ≥ 7/10; Repromptception per-agent prompt quality score 8+/10; all required sections present, actionable and specific.
adaptive-compaction
IncludedAdaptive add-on policy and recovery layer that decides WHEN to compact, prune, snapshot, or fork -- replacing fixed-percent auto-compaction across Claude Code, Codex, and MCP-capable hosts. Trigger on auto-compact timing or damage: "when should I compact", "is it safe to compact now or start a fresh session", "auto-compact fires too early/mid-task", "switching to an unrelated task but the window still has space", "context rot", "answers get worse the longer the session runs", "the agent forgot the plan or my decisions after it summarized", "add a layer on top that manages context without changing the agent", raising autoCompactWindow to give the policy room, or installing/tuning a cross-tool compaction policy or PreCompact hook -- even when "compaction" is never said but the problem is context-window pressure or post-summarization memory loss. Do NOT use to summarize a conversation, build RAG, write a summarization prompt (decides WHEN not HOW), or answer max-context-length trivia.
agent-skill-creator
IncludedCreate cross-platform agent skills from workflow descriptions. Activates when users ask to create an agent, automate a repetitive workflow, create a custom skill, or need advanced agent creation. Triggers on phrases like create agent for, automate workflow, create skill for, every day I have to, daily I need to, turn process into agent, need to automate, create a cross-platform skill, validate this skill, export this skill, migrate this skill. Supports single skills, multi-agent suites, transcript processing, template-based creation, interactive configuration, cross-platform export, and spec validation.
llm-wiki
IncludedUse when building or maintaining a persistent personal knowledge base (second brain) in Obsidian where an LLM incrementally ingests sources, updates entity/concept pages, maintains cross-references, and keeps a synthesis current. Triggers include "second brain", "Obsidian wiki", "personal knowledge management", "ingest this paper/article/book", "build a research wiki", "compound knowledge", "Memex", or whenever the user wants knowledge to accumulate across sessions instead of being re-derived by RAG on every query.
skill-master
IncludedAgent Skills authoring, evaluation, and optimization. Create, edit, validate, benchmark, and improve skills following the agentskills.io specification. Use when designing SKILL.md files, structuring skill folders (references, scripts, assets), ingesting external documentation into skills, running trigger evals, benchmarking skill quality, optimizing descriptions, or performing blind A/B comparisons. Keywords: agentskills.io, SKILL.md, skill authoring, eval, benchmark, trigger optimization.