test-driven-development
Comprehensive TDD patterns and practices for all programming languages, eliminating redundant testing guidance per agent.
What this skill does
# Test-Driven Development (TDD)
Comprehensive TDD patterns and practices for all programming languages. This skill eliminates ~500-800 lines of redundant testing guidance per agent.
## When to Use
Apply TDD for:
- New feature implementation
- Bug fixes (test the bug first)
- Code refactoring (tests ensure behavior preservation)
- API development (test contracts)
- Complex business logic
## TDD Workflow (Red-Green-Refactor)
### 1. Red Phase: Write Failing Test
```
Write a test that:
- Describes the desired behavior
- Fails for the right reason (not due to syntax errors)
- Is focused on a single behavior
```
### 2. Green Phase: Make It Pass
```
Write the minimum code to:
- Pass the test
- Not introduce regressions
- Follow existing patterns
```
### 3. Refactor Phase: Improve Code
```
While keeping tests green:
- Remove duplication
- Improve naming
- Simplify logic
- Extract functions/classes
```
## Test Structure Patterns
### Arrange-Act-Assert (AAA)
```
// Arrange: Set up test data and conditions
const user = createTestUser({ role: 'admin' });
// Act: Perform the action being tested
const result = await authenticateUser(user);
// Assert: Verify the outcome
expect(result.isAuthenticated).toBe(true);
expect(result.permissions).toContain('admin');
```
### Given-When-Then (BDD Style)
```
Given: A user with admin privileges
When: They attempt to access protected resource
Then: Access is granted with appropriate permissions
```
## Test Naming Conventions
### Pattern: `test_should_<expected_behavior>_when_<condition>`
**Examples:**
- `test_should_return_user_when_id_exists()`
- `test_should_raise_error_when_user_not_found()`
- `test_should_validate_email_format_when_creating_account()`
### Language-Specific Conventions
**Python (pytest):**
```python
def test_should_calculate_total_when_items_added():
# Arrange
cart = ShoppingCart()
cart.add_item(Item("Book", 10.00))
cart.add_item(Item("Pen", 1.50))
# Act
total = cart.calculate_total()
# Assert
assert total == 11.50
```
**JavaScript (Jest):**
```javascript
describe('ShoppingCart', () => {
test('should calculate total when items added', () => {
const cart = new ShoppingCart();
cart.addItem({ name: 'Book', price: 10.00 });
cart.addItem({ name: 'Pen', price: 1.50 });
const total = cart.calculateTotal();
expect(total).toBe(11.50);
});
});
```
**Go:**
```go
func TestShouldCalculateTotalWhenItemsAdded(t *testing.T) {
// Arrange
cart := NewShoppingCart()
cart.AddItem(Item{Name: "Book", Price: 10.00})
cart.AddItem(Item{Name: "Pen", Price: 1.50})
// Act
total := cart.CalculateTotal()
// Assert
if total != 11.50 {
t.Errorf("Expected 11.50, got %f", total)
}
}
```
## Test Types and Scope
### Unit Tests
- **Scope:** Single function/method
- **Dependencies:** Mocked
- **Speed:** Fast (< 10ms per test)
- **Coverage:** 80%+ of code paths
### Integration Tests
- **Scope:** Multiple components
- **Dependencies:** Real or test doubles
- **Speed:** Moderate (< 1s per test)
- **Coverage:** Critical paths and interfaces
### End-to-End Tests
- **Scope:** Full user workflows
- **Dependencies:** Real (in test environment)
- **Speed:** Slow (seconds to minutes)
- **Coverage:** Core user journeys
## Mocking and Test Doubles
### When to Mock
- External APIs and services
- Database operations (for unit tests)
- File system operations
- Time-dependent operations
- Random number generation
### Mock Types
**Stub:** Returns predefined data
```python
def get_user_stub(user_id):
return User(id=user_id, name="Test User")
```
**Mock:** Verifies interactions
```python
mock_service = Mock()
service.process_payment(payment_data)
mock_service.process_payment.assert_called_once_with(payment_data)
```
**Fake:** Working implementation (simplified)
```python
class FakeDatabase:
def __init__(self):
self.data = {}
def save(self, key, value):
self.data[key] = value
def get(self, key):
return self.data.get(key)
```
## Test Coverage Guidelines
### Target Coverage Levels
- **Critical paths:** 100%
- **Business logic:** 95%+
- **Overall project:** 80%+
- **UI components:** 70%+
### What to Test
- ✅ Business logic and algorithms
- ✅ Edge cases and boundary conditions
- ✅ Error handling and validation
- ✅ State transitions
- ✅ Public APIs and interfaces
### What NOT to Test
- ❌ Framework internals
- ❌ Third-party libraries
- ❌ Trivial getters/setters
- ❌ Generated code
- ❌ Configuration files
## Testing Best Practices
### 1. One Assertion Per Test (When Possible)
```python
# Good: Focused test
def test_should_validate_email_format():
assert is_valid_email("[email protected]") is True
# Avoid: Multiple unrelated assertions
def test_validation():
assert is_valid_email("[email protected]") is True
assert is_valid_phone("123-456-7890") is True # Different concept
```
### 2. Test Independence
```python
# Good: Each test is self-contained
def test_user_creation():
user = create_user("[email protected]")
assert user.email == "[email protected]"
# Avoid: Tests depending on execution order
shared_user = None
def test_create_user():
global shared_user
shared_user = create_user("[email protected]")
def test_update_user(): # Depends on previous test
shared_user.name = "Updated"
```
### 3. Descriptive Test Failures
```python
# Good: Clear failure message
assert result.status == 200, f"Expected 200, got {result.status}: {result.body}"
# Avoid: Unclear failure
assert result.status == 200
```
### 4. Test Data Builders
```python
# Good: Reusable test data creation
def create_test_user(**overrides):
defaults = {
'email': '[email protected]',
'name': 'Test User',
'role': 'user'
}
return User(**{**defaults, **overrides})
# Usage
admin = create_test_user(role='admin')
guest = create_test_user(email='[email protected]')
```
## Testing Anti-Patterns to Avoid
### ❌ Testing Implementation Details
```python
# Bad: Tests internal structure
def test_user_storage():
user = User("[email protected]")
assert user._internal_cache is not None # Implementation detail
```
### ❌ Fragile Tests
```python
# Bad: Breaks with harmless changes
assert user.to_json() == '{"name":"John","email":"[email protected]"}'
# Good: Tests behavior, not format
data = json.loads(user.to_json())
assert data['name'] == "John"
assert data['email'] == "[email protected]"
```
### ❌ Slow Tests in Unit Test Suite
```python
# Bad: Real HTTP calls in unit tests
def test_api_integration():
response = requests.get("https://api.example.com/users") # Slow!
assert response.status_code == 200
```
### ❌ Testing Everything Through UI
```python
# Bad: Testing business logic through UI
def test_calculation():
browser.click("#input1")
browser.type("5")
browser.click("#input2")
browser.type("3")
browser.click("#calculate")
assert browser.find("#result").text == "8"
# Good: Test logic directly
def test_calculation():
assert calculate(5, 3) == 8
```
## Quick Reference by Language
### Python (pytest)
```python
# Setup/Teardown
@pytest.fixture
def database():
db = create_test_database()
yield db
db.cleanup()
# Parametrized tests
@pytest.mark.parametrize("input,expected", [
("[email protected]", True),
("invalid-email", False),
])
def test_email_validation(input, expected):
assert is_valid_email(input) == expected
```
### JavaScript (Jest)
```javascript
// Setup/Teardown
beforeEach(() => {
database = createTestDatabase();
});
afterEach(() => {
database.cleanup();
});
// Async tests
test('should fetch user data', async () => {
const user = await fetchUser(1);
expect(user.name).toBe('John');
});
```
### Go
```go
// Table-driven tests
func TestEmailValidation(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct {
input string
expected bool
}{
{"[email protected]", true},
{"invalid-emRelated in AI Agents
skill-development
IncludedComprehensive meta-skill for creating, managing, validating, auditing, and distributing Claude Code skills and slash commands (unified in v2.1.3+). Provides skill templates, creation workflows, validation patterns, audit checklists, naming conventions, YAML frontmatter guidance, progressive disclosure examples, and best practices lookup. Use when creating new skills, validating existing skills, auditing skill quality, understanding skill architecture, needing skill templates, learning about YAML frontmatter requirements, progressive disclosure patterns, tool restrictions (allowed-tools), skill composition, skill naming conventions, troubleshooting skill activation issues, creating custom slash commands, configuring command frontmatter, using command arguments ($ARGUMENTS, $1, $2), bash execution in commands, file references in commands, command namespacing, plugin commands, MCP slash commands, Skill tool configuration, or deciding between skills vs slash commands. Delegates to docs-management skill for official documentation.
reprompter
IncludedTransform messy prompts into well-structured, effective prompts — single or multi-agent. Use when: "reprompt", "reprompt this", "clean up this prompt", "structure my prompt", rough text needing XML tags and best practices, "reprompter teams", "repromptception", "run with quality", "smart run", "smart agents", multi-agent tasks, audits, parallel work, anything going to agent teams. Don't use when: simple Q&A, pure chat, immediate execution-only tasks. See "Don't Use When" section for details. Outputs: Structured XML/Markdown prompt, quality score (before/after), optional team brief + per-agent sub-prompts, agent team output files. Success criteria: Single mode quality score ≥ 7/10; Repromptception per-agent prompt quality score 8+/10; all required sections present, actionable and specific.
adaptive-compaction
IncludedAdaptive add-on policy and recovery layer that decides WHEN to compact, prune, snapshot, or fork -- replacing fixed-percent auto-compaction across Claude Code, Codex, and MCP-capable hosts. Trigger on auto-compact timing or damage: "when should I compact", "is it safe to compact now or start a fresh session", "auto-compact fires too early/mid-task", "switching to an unrelated task but the window still has space", "context rot", "answers get worse the longer the session runs", "the agent forgot the plan or my decisions after it summarized", "add a layer on top that manages context without changing the agent", raising autoCompactWindow to give the policy room, or installing/tuning a cross-tool compaction policy or PreCompact hook -- even when "compaction" is never said but the problem is context-window pressure or post-summarization memory loss. Do NOT use to summarize a conversation, build RAG, write a summarization prompt (decides WHEN not HOW), or answer max-context-length trivia.
agent-skill-creator
IncludedCreate cross-platform agent skills from workflow descriptions. Activates when users ask to create an agent, automate a repetitive workflow, create a custom skill, or need advanced agent creation. Triggers on phrases like create agent for, automate workflow, create skill for, every day I have to, daily I need to, turn process into agent, need to automate, create a cross-platform skill, validate this skill, export this skill, migrate this skill. Supports single skills, multi-agent suites, transcript processing, template-based creation, interactive configuration, cross-platform export, and spec validation.
llm-wiki
IncludedUse when building or maintaining a persistent personal knowledge base (second brain) in Obsidian where an LLM incrementally ingests sources, updates entity/concept pages, maintains cross-references, and keeps a synthesis current. Triggers include "second brain", "Obsidian wiki", "personal knowledge management", "ingest this paper/article/book", "build a research wiki", "compound knowledge", "Memex", or whenever the user wants knowledge to accumulate across sessions instead of being re-derived by RAG on every query.
skill-master
IncludedAgent Skills authoring, evaluation, and optimization. Create, edit, validate, benchmark, and improve skills following the agentskills.io specification. Use when designing SKILL.md files, structuring skill folders (references, scripts, assets), ingesting external documentation into skills, running trigger evals, benchmarking skill quality, optimizing descriptions, or performing blind A/B comparisons. Keywords: agentskills.io, SKILL.md, skill authoring, eval, benchmark, trigger optimization.