test-kitchen
This skill should be used when implementing features with parallel exploration or competition. Triggers on "build", "create", "implement", "try both approaches", "compare implementations". Routes to omakase-off (entry gate for design exploration) or cookoff (exit gate for parallel implementation).
What this skill does
# Test Kitchen
Parallel implementation framework with two gate skills:
| Skill | Gate | Trigger |
|-------|------|---------|
| `test-kitchen:omakase-off` | **Entry** | FIRST on any build/create/implement request |
| `test-kitchen:cookoff` | **Exit** | At design→implementation transition |
## Flow
```
"Build X" / "Create Y" / "Implement Z"
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│ OMAKASE-OFF (entry gate) │
│ Wraps brainstorming │
│ │
│ Choice: │
│ 1. Brainstorm together │
│ 2. Omakase (3-5 parallel designs) │
└─────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
[Brainstorming / Design phase]
↓
Design complete, "let's implement"
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│ COOKOFF (exit gate) │
│ Wraps implementation │
│ │
│ Choice: │
│ 1. Cookoff (2-5 parallel agents) │
│ 2. Single subagent │
│ 3. Local implementation │
└─────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
[Implementation]
```
## Key Insight
**Skills need aggressive triggers to work.** They can't passively detect "uncertainty" or "readiness" - they must claim specific moments in the conversation flow.
- **Omakase-off**: Claims the BUILD/CREATE moment (before brainstorming)
- **Cookoff**: Claims the IMPLEMENT moment (after design)
## When Each Triggers
### Omakase-off (Three Triggers)
**Trigger 1: BEFORE brainstorming**
- "I want to build...", "Create a...", "Implement...", "Add a feature..."
- ANY signal to start building something
- Offers choice: Brainstorm together OR Omakase (parallel designs)
**Trigger 2: DURING brainstorming (slot detection)**
- 2+ uncertain responses on architectural decisions
- "not sure", "don't know", "either works", "you pick", "no preference"
- Offers to explore detected slots in parallel
**Trigger 3: Explicitly requested**
- "try both approaches", "explore both", "omakase"
- "implement both variants", "let's see which is better"
### Cookoff
- "Let's implement"
- "Looks good, let's build"
- "Ready to code"
- Design doc just committed
- ANY signal to move from design to code
## Omakase Mode (Skip Brainstorming)
If user picks "Omakase" at the entry gate:
1. Quick context gathering (1-2 questions)
2. Generate 3-5 best architectural approaches
3. Implement ALL in parallel
4. Tests pick the winner
5. Skip detailed brainstorming entirely
Best for: "I'm flexible, show me options in working code"
## Cookoff Mode (Parallel Implementation)
If user picks "Cookoff" at the exit gate:
1. Each agent reads the same design doc
2. Each agent creates their OWN implementation plan
3. All implement in parallel
4. Compare results, pick winner
Best for: "I want to see different implementation approaches"
## Key Distinction
| | Omakase-off | Cookoff |
|-|-------------|---------|
| **Gate** | Entry (before/during brainstorming) | Exit (after design) |
| **Question** | HOW to explore? | HOW to implement? |
| **Parallel on** | Different DESIGNS | Same design, different PLANS |
| **Triggers** | Build request, indecision detection, explicit | "let's implement" signal |
| **Skips** | Brainstorming (optional via short-circuit) | Nothing - always after design |
## Slot Detection (During Brainstorming)
When omakase-off delegates to brainstorming, it passively tracks architectural decisions where user shows uncertainty:
**Detection signals:**
- "not sure", "don't know", "either works", "both sound good"
- "you pick", "whatever you think", "no preference"
- User defers 2+ decisions in a row
**Slot classification:**
| Type | Examples | Worth exploring? |
|------|----------|------------------|
| **Architectural** | Storage engine, framework, auth method | Yes - different code paths |
| **Trivial** | File location, naming, config format | No - easy to change |
**At end of brainstorming:**
- If architectural slots exist → offer parallel exploration
- If no slots → hand off to cookoff for implementation
Related in Design
contribute
IncludedLocal-only OSS contribution command center. Auto-refreshes the user's in-flight PR and issue state on invoke so conversations start with full context — no need to brief Claude on what's in flight. Helps the user find issues to contribute to on GitHub, builds per-repo dossiers of what each upstream expects (CLA, DCO, branch convention, AI policy, draft-first, review bots, issue templates), runs deterministic gates before any external action so AI-assisted contributions don't reach maintainers as slop. State is markdown-only: candidate files at ~/.contribute-system/candidates/, repo dossiers at ~/.contribute-system/research/, append-only event log at ~/.contribute-system/log.jsonl. No database, no cloud calls. Use when the user asks about their PRs / issues / contributions, wants to find new work to take on, claim an issue, build/refresh a repo's dossier, or draft a Design Issue or PR. Trigger with "/contribute", "what's my PR status", "find a contribution", "claim issue X", "draft a Design Issue for Y", "refresh dossier for Z".
architectural-analysis
IncludedUser-triggered deep architectural analysis of a codebase or scoped subtree across eight modes — information architecture, data flow, integration points, UI surfaces, interaction patterns, data model, control flow, and failure modes. This skill should be used when the user asks to "diagram this codebase," "map the architecture," "show the data flow," "give me an ERD," "trace control flow," "find the integration points," "verify the layout pattern," "audit the UX architecture," or any similar request whose primary deliverable is mermaid diagrams plus cited reports under docs/architecture/. Dispatches haiku/sonnet sub-agents in parallel for per-mode exploration, then verifies every citation mechanically before any node lands in a diagram. Not for one-off prose explanations of code (use code-explanation) or for high-level system design from scratch (use system-design).
mcp
IncludedModel Context Protocol (MCP) server development and tool management. Languages: Python, TypeScript. Capabilities: build MCP servers, integrate external APIs, discover/execute MCP tools, manage multi-server configs, design agent-centric tools. Actions: create, build, integrate, discover, execute, configure MCP servers/tools. Keywords: MCP, Model Context Protocol, MCP server, MCP tool, stdio transport, SSE transport, tool discovery, resource provider, prompt template, external API integration, Gemini CLI MCP, Claude MCP, agent tools, tool execution, server config. Use when: building MCP servers, integrating external APIs as MCP tools, discovering available MCP tools, executing MCP capabilities, configuring multi-server setups, designing tools for AI agents.
react-native-skia
IncludedDesign, build, debug, and optimise high-polish animated graphics in React Native or Expo using @shopify/react-native-skia, Reanimated, and Gesture Handler. Use when the user wants canvas-driven UI, shaders, paths, rich text, image filters, sprite fields, Skottie, video frames, snapshots, web CanvasKit setup, or performance tuning for custom motion-heavy elements such as loaders, hero art, cards, charts, progress indicators, particle systems, or gesture-driven surfaces. Also use when the user asks for fluid, glow, glass, blob, parallax, 60fps/120fps, or GPU-friendly animated effects in React Native, even if they do not explicitly say "Skia". Do not use for ordinary form/layout work with standard views.
plaid
IncludedProduct Led AI Development — guides founders from idea to launched product. Six capabilities: Idea (discover a product idea), Validate (pressure-test the idea against fatal flaws, problem reality, competition, and 2-week MVP feasibility), Plan (vision intake + document generation), Design (translate image references into a design.md spec), Launch (go-to-market strategy), and Build (roadmap execution). Use when someone says "PLAID", "plaid idea", "help me find an idea", "product idea", "idea from my business", "idea from my expertise", "plaid validate", "validate my idea", "pressure-test", "is this idea good", "find fatal flaws", "validate the problem", "plan a product", "define my vision", "generate a PRD", "product strategy", "plaid design", "design from image", "translate image to design", "create design.md", "extract design tokens", "plaid launch", "go-to-market", "launch plan", "GTM strategy", "launch playbook", "plaid build", "build the app", "start building", or "execute the roadmap".
nextjs-framer-motion-animations
IncludedAdds production-safe Motion for React or Framer Motion animations to Next.js apps, including reveal, hover and tap micro-interactions, whileInView, stagger, AnimatePresence, layout and layoutId transitions, reorder, scroll-linked UI, and lightweight route-content transitions. Use when the user asks to add, refactor, or debug Motion or Framer Motion in App Router or Pages Router codebases, especially around server/client boundaries, reduced motion, LazyMotion, bundle size, hydration, or route transitions. Avoid for GSAP-style timelines, WebGL or 3D scenes, heavy scroll storytelling, or CSS-only effects unless Motion is explicitly requested.