testing
Test writing and fixing methodology. Covers TDD, investigating failures, and delegating fixes to agents. Use when writing tests or diagnosing test failures.
What this skill does
# Writing and Fixing Tests ## Investigate First A failing test signals one of two things: 1. **The test is wrong** — outdated expectations, flaky setup, incorrect assertions 2. **The code is broken** — regression, missing edge case, integration failure **Don't assume.** Read the failure, trace the code path, determine which is true before changing anything. **Common signs the test is wrong:** - Assertions don't match documented behavior - Test relies on implementation details that changed intentionally - Flaky failures that pass on retry **Common signs the code is broken:** - Test matched previously working behavior - Multiple tests fail in related areas - Error messages indicate actual bugs (null refs, type errors, missing data) ## TDD When adding new functionality, write tests first: 1. **Red** — Write a failing test that specifies the behavior 2. **Green** — Write minimal code to pass the test 3. **Refactor** — Clean up while tests stay green Benefits: - Forces you to clarify requirements before coding - Prevents over-engineering (you only write what's needed) - Catches regressions immediately **Skip TDD when:** fixing obvious bugs, exploratory prototyping, or when the test setup cost exceeds the implementation. ## Delegating Test Fixes When using agents to fix test failures: 1. **Agent makes the fix and exits** — no test execution 2. **Orchestrator runs tests** after agent returns 3. **Repeat** if failures remain **Why agents don't run tests:** - Prevents chasing cascading failures - Avoids wasted context on test output parsing - Forces agents to report blockers instead of attempting workarounds **In agent instructions, include:** ``` Fix the failing test. Do NOT run the test suite—make your change and exit. ``` If an agent encounters ambiguity about whether to fix the test or the code, it should stop and report a blocker. ## Before Fixing - [ ] Read the failure message and stack trace? - [ ] Identified whether test or code is wrong? - [ ] Understand the expected vs actual behavior? If no, keep investigating.
Related in Writing & Docs
jax-development
IncludedUse this skill when the user is writing, debugging, profiling, refactoring, reviewing, benchmarking, parallelising, exporting, or explaining JAX code, or when they mention JAX, jax.numpy, jit, grad, value_and_grad, vmap, scan, lax, random keys, pytrees, jax.Array, sharding, Mesh, PartitionSpec, NamedSharding, pmap, shard_map, Pallas, XLA, StableHLO, checkify, profiler, or the JAX repo. It helps turn NumPy or PyTorch-style code into pure functional JAX, fix tracer/control-flow/shape/PRNG bugs, remove recompiles and host-device syncs, choose transforms and sharding strategies, inspect jaxpr/lowering/IR, and benchmark compiled code correctly.
nature-article-writer
IncludedDrafts, rewrites, diagnostically critiques, and style-calibrates primary research manuscripts for Nature and Nature Portfolio journals. Use when the user wants a Nature-style title, summary paragraph or abstract, introduction, results, discussion, methods, figure legends, presubmission enquiry, cover letter, reviewer response, or when a scientific draft sounds generic, jargon-heavy, structurally weak, or AI-ish and needs precise, broad-reader-friendly prose without inventing data, analyses, or references. Best for primary research articles and letters rather than reviews or press releases unless explicitly adapting one.
deckrd
IncludedDocument-driven framework that derives requirements, specifications, implementation plans, and executable tasks from goals through structured AI dialogue. Use when user says "write requirements", "create spec", "plan implementation", "derive tasks", "structure this feature", "break down into tasks", or "document this module". Also use for reverse engineering existing code into docs (/deckrd rev). Do NOT use for direct code writing — use /deckrd-coder after tasks are generated. Do NOT use when the user only wants to run or fix existing code without planning.
clinical-decision-support
IncludedGenerate professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical and clinical research settings, including patient cohort analyses (biomarker-stratified with outcomes) and treatment recommendation reports (evidence-based guidelines with decision algorithms). Supports GRADE evidence grading, statistical analysis (hazard ratios, survival curves, waterfall plots), biomarker integration, and regulatory compliance. Outputs publication-ready LaTeX/PDF format optimized for drug development, clinical research, and evidence synthesis.
handling-sf-data
IncludedSalesforce data operations with 130-point scoring. Use this skill to create, update, delete, bulk import/export, generate test data, and clean up org records using sf CLI and anonymous Apex. TRIGGER when: user creates test data, performs bulk import/export, uses sf data CLI commands, needs data factory patterns for Apex tests, or needs to seed/clean records in a Salesforce org. DO NOT TRIGGER when: SOQL query writing only (use querying-soql), Apex test execution (use running-apex-tests), or metadata deployment (use deploying-metadata).
accelint-ac-to-playwright
IncludedConvert and validate acceptance criteria for Playwright test automation. Use when user asks to (1) review/evaluate/check if AC are ready for automation, (2) assess if AC can be converted as-is, (3) validate AC quality for Playwright, (4) turn AC into tests, (5) generate tests from acceptance criteria, (6) convert .md bullets or .feature Gherkin files to Playwright specs, (7) create test automation from requirements. Handles both bullet-style markdown and Gherkin syntax with JSON test plan generation and validation.