tiger-style
TigerBeetle coding style for safety-critical Zig code. Use for writing new code aligned with TigerStyle, or analyzing existing code to produce structured reports showing aligned patterns, violations, and gray areas.
What this skill does
# TigerStyle Skill Coding style from TigerBeetle optimized for **Safety > Performance > DX**. ## Usage Modes | Invocation | Mode | Output | |------------|------|--------| | `/tiger-style` | Writing | Guidance for writing new code | | `/tiger-style analyze <file>` | Analysis | Complete report: Aligned + Violations + Gray Areas | | `/tiger-style check` | Quick check | Violations only (brief) | ## Mode Instructions ### Writing Mode (`/tiger-style`) When invoked without arguments, activate TigerStyle for all code you write or modify in this session: 1. Read [SAFETY.md](SAFETY.md), [PERFORMANCE.md](PERFORMANCE.md), and [DX.md](DX.md) to load the full rule set. 2. Apply all rules as you write Zig code. Every function you produce must have 2+ assertions (preconditions, postconditions, or invariants). 3. Before presenting code to the user, validate it against [CHECKLIST.md](CHECKLIST.md). 4. If a rule would be violated, fix it before showing the code. If a gray area arises, flag it to the user. ### Analyze Mode (`/tiger-style analyze <file>`) When invoked with `analyze` and a file path: 1. Read the file specified in `$ARGUMENTS` (the path after `analyze`). 2. Read [SAFETY.md](SAFETY.md), [PERFORMANCE.md](PERFORMANCE.md), and [DX.md](DX.md) for the complete rule set. 3. Produce a structured report following the template in [REPORT_FORMAT.md](REPORT_FORMAT.md). 4. Check every rule against the file. Be thorough - scan for all violation types, not just obvious ones. 5. Group aligned patterns by category. Group violations by severity. Note gray areas with reasoning. ### Check Mode (`/tiger-style check`) When invoked with `check`: 1. Scan the current file, staged changes, or recently modified Zig files. 2. Report only violations, grouped by severity (CRITICAL first, then MAJOR, then MINOR). 3. Skip aligned patterns and gray areas - keep output brief. 4. Use the format: `SEVERITY | location | rule | issue` (one line per violation). ## Workflow After analysis or check, guide the user through fixing: 1. Fix CRITICAL violations first - these are safety risks. 2. Fix MAJOR violations - these affect maintainability. 3. MINOR violations are worth fixing but should not block progress. 4. Run `/tiger-style check` to verify fixes. 5. Repeat until clean. ## Quick Lookup | Topic | See | Key Rules | |-------|-----|-----------| | Assertions | [SAFETY.md](SAFETY.md) | Min 2 per function, pair assertions, split compound | | Control flow | [SAFETY.md](SAFETY.md) | No recursion, split compound conditions, every if has else | | Memory | [SAFETY.md](SAFETY.md) | Static only, no dynamic after init | | Function size | [SAFETY.md](SAFETY.md) | Max 70 lines | | Types | [SAFETY.md](SAFETY.md) | Explicit sizes (u32 not usize) | | Performance | [PERFORMANCE.md](PERFORMANCE.md) | Design-time thinking, batching, buffer bleeds | | Resources | [PERFORMANCE.md](PERFORMANCE.md) | Network > disk > memory > CPU | | Naming | [DX.md](DX.md) | snake_case, units last, semantic richness | | Formatting | [DX.md](DX.md) | 80 cols, 4-space indent, braces on ifs | | Bug prevention | [DX.md](DX.md) | Off-by-one, explicit division, options structs | | Pre-submit | [CHECKLIST.md](CHECKLIST.md) | Quick validation checklist | | Report format | [REPORT_FORMAT.md](REPORT_FORMAT.md) | Analysis output template | ## Our Customizations (vs pure TigerStyle) | Rule | TigerStyle | Our Standard | |------|------------|--------------| | Line length | 100 columns | **80 columns** | | Assertions | 2+ per function | Same | | Memory in structs | Never store allocator | Same + never store Io | ## Severity Definitions | Severity | Criteria | |----------|----------| | **CRITICAL** | Safety risk: missing assertions, unbounded loops, dynamic memory, ignored errors, missing else branches | | **MAJOR** | Maintainability: function too long, complex control flow, usize instead of explicit type | | **MINOR** | Style: naming, formatting, comments |
Related in Writing & Docs
jax-development
IncludedUse this skill when the user is writing, debugging, profiling, refactoring, reviewing, benchmarking, parallelising, exporting, or explaining JAX code, or when they mention JAX, jax.numpy, jit, grad, value_and_grad, vmap, scan, lax, random keys, pytrees, jax.Array, sharding, Mesh, PartitionSpec, NamedSharding, pmap, shard_map, Pallas, XLA, StableHLO, checkify, profiler, or the JAX repo. It helps turn NumPy or PyTorch-style code into pure functional JAX, fix tracer/control-flow/shape/PRNG bugs, remove recompiles and host-device syncs, choose transforms and sharding strategies, inspect jaxpr/lowering/IR, and benchmark compiled code correctly.
nature-article-writer
IncludedDrafts, rewrites, diagnostically critiques, and style-calibrates primary research manuscripts for Nature and Nature Portfolio journals. Use when the user wants a Nature-style title, summary paragraph or abstract, introduction, results, discussion, methods, figure legends, presubmission enquiry, cover letter, reviewer response, or when a scientific draft sounds generic, jargon-heavy, structurally weak, or AI-ish and needs precise, broad-reader-friendly prose without inventing data, analyses, or references. Best for primary research articles and letters rather than reviews or press releases unless explicitly adapting one.
deckrd
IncludedDocument-driven framework that derives requirements, specifications, implementation plans, and executable tasks from goals through structured AI dialogue. Use when user says "write requirements", "create spec", "plan implementation", "derive tasks", "structure this feature", "break down into tasks", or "document this module". Also use for reverse engineering existing code into docs (/deckrd rev). Do NOT use for direct code writing — use /deckrd-coder after tasks are generated. Do NOT use when the user only wants to run or fix existing code without planning.
clinical-decision-support
IncludedGenerate professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical and clinical research settings, including patient cohort analyses (biomarker-stratified with outcomes) and treatment recommendation reports (evidence-based guidelines with decision algorithms). Supports GRADE evidence grading, statistical analysis (hazard ratios, survival curves, waterfall plots), biomarker integration, and regulatory compliance. Outputs publication-ready LaTeX/PDF format optimized for drug development, clinical research, and evidence synthesis.
handling-sf-data
IncludedSalesforce data operations with 130-point scoring. Use this skill to create, update, delete, bulk import/export, generate test data, and clean up org records using sf CLI and anonymous Apex. TRIGGER when: user creates test data, performs bulk import/export, uses sf data CLI commands, needs data factory patterns for Apex tests, or needs to seed/clean records in a Salesforce org. DO NOT TRIGGER when: SOQL query writing only (use querying-soql), Apex test execution (use running-apex-tests), or metadata deployment (use deploying-metadata).
accelint-ac-to-playwright
IncludedConvert and validate acceptance criteria for Playwright test automation. Use when user asks to (1) review/evaluate/check if AC are ready for automation, (2) assess if AC can be converted as-is, (3) validate AC quality for Playwright, (4) turn AC into tests, (5) generate tests from acceptance criteria, (6) convert .md bullets or .feature Gherkin files to Playwright specs, (7) create test automation from requirements. Handles both bullet-style markdown and Gherkin syntax with JSON test plan generation and validation.