tla-plus-expert

Included with Lifetime

$97 forever

TLA+ formal specification expert for writing specs, model checking, and applying formal methods to amplihack workflows

Writing & Docs

What this skill does


# TLA+ Expert Skill

## Purpose

Provides expert-level TLA+ formal specification assistance for designing, verifying, and reasoning about concurrent and distributed systems within amplihack.

## When This Skill Activates

- User asks to write or review a TLA+ specification
- User needs help with model checking (TLC) configuration or output interpretation
- User wants to formally verify a protocol or workflow design
- User asks about invariants, liveness properties, or safety properties
- User wants to apply formal methods to amplihack components
- User mentions PlusCal or wants to translate between PlusCal and TLA+
- User references Lamport, Demirbas, or formal methods best practices

## How It Works

This skill delegates to the `tla-plus-expert` agent which has deep knowledge of:

1. **TLA+ language and idioms** — writing specs, operators, temporal formulas
2. **TLC model checker** — configuration, trace interpretation, state space management
3. **Seven mental models** (Demirbas) — abstraction, global shared memory, local guards, invariants, stepwise refinement, atomicity refinement, communication
4. **Industry case studies** — 8 production uses from AWS, MongoDB, Microsoft Azure
5. **AI + TLA+ limitations** — SysMoBench findings on LLM capabilities and guardrails
6. **amplihack experiment infrastructure** — manifest-driven experiments, heuristic scoring, TLC validation integration

## Integration with Existing Infrastructure

The amplihack repo includes a TLA+ experiment runner at `src/amplihack/eval/tla_prompt_experiment.py` with:

- Manifest-driven experiment matrix (models x prompt variants x repeats)
- 6 heuristic scoring dimensions
- Real TLC validation support
- Replay and live execution modes

TLA+ specs live in `experiments/hive_mind/tla_prompt_language/specs/`.

## Usage Examples

```
# Write a spec for a new protocol
/tla-plus-expert Write a TLA+ spec for our consensus voting workflow

# Review an existing spec
/tla-plus-expert Review specs/SmartOrchestrator.tla for correctness

# Help with TLC output
/tla-plus-expert TLC found a counterexample in my spec, help me understand it

# Decide if TLA+ is appropriate
/tla-plus-expert Should I formally specify this retry cascade logic?

# Generate invariants
/tla-plus-expert What invariants should I check for a parallel workstream manager?
```

## Key Resources

- TLA+ specs: `experiments/hive_mind/tla_prompt_language/specs/`
- Experiment runner: `src/amplihack/eval/tla_prompt_experiment.py`
- TLC binary: `/usr/local/bin/tlc` (if installed)
- Issue #3939: TLA+ integration roadmap

Files: 1

Size: 3.0 KB

Complexity: 11/100

Category: Writing & Docs

Source: https://github.com/rysweet/amplihack/tree/main/docs/claude/skills/tla-plus-expert

Related in Writing & Docs

jax-development

Included

Use this skill when the user is writing, debugging, profiling, refactoring, reviewing, benchmarking, parallelising, exporting, or explaining JAX code, or when they mention JAX, jax.numpy, jit, grad, value_and_grad, vmap, scan, lax, random keys, pytrees, jax.Array, sharding, Mesh, PartitionSpec, NamedSharding, pmap, shard_map, Pallas, XLA, StableHLO, checkify, profiler, or the JAX repo. It helps turn NumPy or PyTorch-style code into pure functional JAX, fix tracer/control-flow/shape/PRNG bugs, remove recompiles and host-device syncs, choose transforms and sharding strategies, inspect jaxpr/lowering/IR, and benchmark compiled code correctly.

Writing & Docsscripts

nature-article-writer

Included

Drafts, rewrites, diagnostically critiques, and style-calibrates primary research manuscripts for Nature and Nature Portfolio journals. Use when the user wants a Nature-style title, summary paragraph or abstract, introduction, results, discussion, methods, figure legends, presubmission enquiry, cover letter, reviewer response, or when a scientific draft sounds generic, jargon-heavy, structurally weak, or AI-ish and needs precise, broad-reader-friendly prose without inventing data, analyses, or references. Best for primary research articles and letters rather than reviews or press releases unless explicitly adapting one.

Writing & Docsscripts

deckrd

Included

Document-driven framework that derives requirements, specifications, implementation plans, and executable tasks from goals through structured AI dialogue. Use when user says "write requirements", "create spec", "plan implementation", "derive tasks", "structure this feature", "break down into tasks", or "document this module". Also use for reverse engineering existing code into docs (/deckrd rev). Do NOT use for direct code writing — use /deckrd-coder after tasks are generated. Do NOT use when the user only wants to run or fix existing code without planning.

Writing & Docsscripts

clinical-decision-support

Included

Generate professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical and clinical research settings, including patient cohort analyses (biomarker-stratified with outcomes) and treatment recommendation reports (evidence-based guidelines with decision algorithms). Supports GRADE evidence grading, statistical analysis (hazard ratios, survival curves, waterfall plots), biomarker integration, and regulatory compliance. Outputs publication-ready LaTeX/PDF format optimized for drug development, clinical research, and evidence synthesis.

Writing & Docsscripts

handling-sf-data

Included

Salesforce data operations with 130-point scoring. Use this skill to create, update, delete, bulk import/export, generate test data, and clean up org records using sf CLI and anonymous Apex. TRIGGER when: user creates test data, performs bulk import/export, uses sf data CLI commands, needs data factory patterns for Apex tests, or needs to seed/clean records in a Salesforce org. DO NOT TRIGGER when: SOQL query writing only (use querying-soql), Apex test execution (use running-apex-tests), or metadata deployment (use deploying-metadata).

Writing & Docsscripts

accelint-ac-to-playwright

Included

Convert and validate acceptance criteria for Playwright test automation. Use when user asks to (1) review/evaluate/check if AC are ready for automation, (2) assess if AC can be converted as-is, (3) validate AC quality for Playwright, (4) turn AC into tests, (5) generate tests from acceptance criteria, (6) convert .md bullets or .feature Gherkin files to Playwright specs, (7) create test automation from requirements. Handles both bullet-style markdown and Gherkin syntax with JSON test plan generation and validation.

Writing & Docsscripts