tool-design-sprint-map-and-target
Day 1 (Monday) move of a Design Sprint that produces the bundled Monday artifact containing long-term goal, sprint questions (3-7 testable risks), customer or system map (5-15 step flow), expert interview notes, HMW (How Might We) cluster board, and the Decider's chosen target moment. Use Day 1 morning and afternoon after the sprint brief is locked. Sets the design target for Tuesday's sketches and Wednesday's storyboard.
What this skill does
<!-- PM-Skills | https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills | Apache 2.0 -->
# Design Sprint Map and Target (Monday)
Produce Monday's bundled artifact: the long-term goal that names success in 1-5 years; 3-7 sprint questions converting team fears into testable risks; a 5-15 step customer or system map from key player to outcome; expert interview notes from cameo experts run in parallel; HMW (How Might We) clusters synthesized from the team; and the Decider's chosen target moment. Monday's output becomes Tuesday's design target.
Family contract: [`docs/reference/skill-families/design-sprint-skills-contract.md`](../../docs/reference/skill-families/design-sprint-skills-contract.md). This skill is a member of `design-sprint-skills`.
## When to Use
- It is Day 1 of the Design Sprint and the brief is locked (via `tool-design-sprint-brief`).
- The team is together (in-person, remote, or hybrid) for the full Monday workshop.
- Expert interviews are scheduled for Monday afternoon (cameo role; 15-30 minutes each).
- The team needs to converge from "five days of work ahead" to "this specific target moment is what we're prototyping."
## When NOT to Use
- The brief is not locked. Return to `tool-design-sprint-brief`; without sprint questions, this skill has nothing to converge toward.
- The challenge is so broad that "long-term goal" would be longer than 5 years. Return to problem framing.
- The team is missing the Decider. The target-moment selection at the end of Monday is the Decider's call; without that call the team disperses Tuesday with no agreed direction.
- The team has already pre-decided the target moment. Monday's value is in the convergence; if it's been pre-decided, Monday becomes ratification theater.
## What This Skill Produces
A single bundled artifact with six sections:
1. **Long-term goal**: one sentence naming success in 1-5 years. Aspirational; cannot be hit in this sprint, but should be visible from the target moment.
2. **Sprint questions**: 3-7 questions converting team fears into testable risks. Phrased as "Can we... ?" or "Will... ?" or "How... ?"; NOT phrased as solutions.
3. **Customer or system map**: 5-15 step flow from key player(s) at the left to outcome (long-term goal) at the right. Includes major actors, decision points, and current alternatives.
4. **Expert interview notes**: synthesized observations from 2-4 cameo experts interviewed Monday afternoon. Surfaced as HMW candidates for the cluster board.
5. **HMW cluster board**: 30-100+ How Might We notes from the team, clustered into 4-8 themes; voted with `tool-note-and-vote` heat-map mechanic to surface top clusters.
6. **Target moment**: the single point on the map (or a tight cluster of points) the Decider picks as the prototyping target. Wednesday's storyboard begins from here.
See `references/TEMPLATE.md` for the canonical structure and `references/EXAMPLE.md` for the Brainshelf book-catalog Monday artifact.
## Inference Inputs
| Input | What the skill does with it |
|---|---|
| Sprint brief (from `tool-design-sprint-brief`) | Pulls the locked sprint questions as seed for refinement; pulls the challenge statement as the long-term goal seed; pulls the team roster for role assignments in note-and-vote |
| Existing research | Used to draft the customer or system map; researcher walks the team through key findings during the map step |
| Analytics | Quantitative grounding for the map's decision-point branch points and abandonment moments |
| Customer examples | Concrete stories used to validate the map's key player and surface map-step gaps |
| Expert interview transcripts (run during Monday) | Synthesized into HMW candidates by the moderator (typically PM or researcher) during the afternoon |
## Monday Time Structure
The full Monday workshop is approximately 7 hours (09:00-12:30 + 13:30-17:00). The skill's bundled artifact emerges across the day:
- **09:00-09:30**: Welcome + brief recap + introductions (does not produce artifact content)
- **09:30-10:30**: Long-term goal (one sentence) + draft sprint questions (3-7)
- **10:30-12:30**: Customer or system map draft (continuous-flow whiteboard work; team builds together)
- **12:30-13:30**: Lunch + first expert interview slot (cameo)
- **13:30-15:30**: Remaining expert interviews (3 slots; 25 min each); team captures HMWs continuously during interviews
- **15:30-16:30**: HMW cluster board synthesis; team adds final HMWs; Facilitator clusters; team heat-map votes via `tool-note-and-vote`
- **16:30-17:00**: Decider picks target moment; signs off; team disperses for Tuesday sketches
This skill's 105-minute timebox covers the facilitated synthesis sections (long-term goal + sprint questions + map draft + HMW clustering + target selection). Expert interviews and silent map-extension work happen in parallel and are not counted in the timebox.
## Common Pitfalls
- **Long-term goal too short.** "Ship Brainshelf MVP by Q3" is a roadmap goal, not a long-term goal. The long-term goal is 1-5 years out and aspirational ("Become the default way 25+/year readers remember and recall books").
- **Sprint questions phrased as solutions.** "Build the camera-capture flow" is a solution; "Can we get sub-3-second capture without abandonment?" is a sprint question. The team must convert fears into questions, not predetermined answers.
- **Map too detailed.** 5-15 steps, not 50. The map is for Decider orientation, not engineering documentation. If the map balloons, the Facilitator forces compression.
- **Skipping HMW because "we already know the opportunities."** HMW's value is divergent surfacing followed by convergent voting. Pre-deciding the opportunities skips both halves.
- **Decider absent at target-moment selection.** The whole point of Monday is the Decider's target choice. If the Decider must leave early, target selection must happen before they leave, even if HMW clustering compresses.
- **Expert interviews skipped or run by the wrong person.** Experts bring outside context the team can't generate internally. Skipping them produces an inward-looking Monday. Running them as group calls (instead of small cameo conversations) wastes expert time and produces less useful HMW input.
## Cross-Skill Usage
Prerequisites: `tool-design-sprint-brief`. Map-and-Target consumes the locked sprint brief and refines the sprint questions during the morning. Without a brief, this skill has no convergence target.
This skill invokes `tool-note-and-vote` twice during the day: once for HMW cluster heat-map voting (anonymous dot-voting to surface top 4-8 clusters) and optionally once for target-moment supervote when the Decider wants team input before deciding. The Decider's call is final regardless of team vote distribution.
Next invocation in the sprint: `tool-design-sprint-sketch` Tuesday morning.
## Canonical Sources
- Knapp, J., Zeratsky, J., and Kowitz, B. *Sprint*. Simon and Schuster, 2016. Monday chapter (Chapters 4-7).
- GV Design Sprint Guide. "Sprint Week Monday." https://www.gv.com/sprint/
- Character Capital. "Design Sprint Day 1." https://www.character.vc
- Google Design Sprint Kit. "Monday agenda template." https://designsprintkit.withgoogle.com/
## Decider Checkpoint
This skill ends with a Decider Checkpoint in `references/TEMPLATE.md`. The Decider's call at the end of Monday is target-moment selection: a single point (or tight cluster of points) on the customer or system map that becomes Tuesday's design target. Without that selection, Tuesday's sketches diverge with no shared direction. The Decider also confirms the long-term goal, the sprint questions, and the top HMW clusters; these become Wednesday's heat-map orientation.
Related in Design
contribute
IncludedLocal-only OSS contribution command center. Auto-refreshes the user's in-flight PR and issue state on invoke so conversations start with full context — no need to brief Claude on what's in flight. Helps the user find issues to contribute to on GitHub, builds per-repo dossiers of what each upstream expects (CLA, DCO, branch convention, AI policy, draft-first, review bots, issue templates), runs deterministic gates before any external action so AI-assisted contributions don't reach maintainers as slop. State is markdown-only: candidate files at ~/.contribute-system/candidates/, repo dossiers at ~/.contribute-system/research/, append-only event log at ~/.contribute-system/log.jsonl. No database, no cloud calls. Use when the user asks about their PRs / issues / contributions, wants to find new work to take on, claim an issue, build/refresh a repo's dossier, or draft a Design Issue or PR. Trigger with "/contribute", "what's my PR status", "find a contribution", "claim issue X", "draft a Design Issue for Y", "refresh dossier for Z".
architectural-analysis
IncludedUser-triggered deep architectural analysis of a codebase or scoped subtree across eight modes — information architecture, data flow, integration points, UI surfaces, interaction patterns, data model, control flow, and failure modes. This skill should be used when the user asks to "diagram this codebase," "map the architecture," "show the data flow," "give me an ERD," "trace control flow," "find the integration points," "verify the layout pattern," "audit the UX architecture," or any similar request whose primary deliverable is mermaid diagrams plus cited reports under docs/architecture/. Dispatches haiku/sonnet sub-agents in parallel for per-mode exploration, then verifies every citation mechanically before any node lands in a diagram. Not for one-off prose explanations of code (use code-explanation) or for high-level system design from scratch (use system-design).
mcp
IncludedModel Context Protocol (MCP) server development and tool management. Languages: Python, TypeScript. Capabilities: build MCP servers, integrate external APIs, discover/execute MCP tools, manage multi-server configs, design agent-centric tools. Actions: create, build, integrate, discover, execute, configure MCP servers/tools. Keywords: MCP, Model Context Protocol, MCP server, MCP tool, stdio transport, SSE transport, tool discovery, resource provider, prompt template, external API integration, Gemini CLI MCP, Claude MCP, agent tools, tool execution, server config. Use when: building MCP servers, integrating external APIs as MCP tools, discovering available MCP tools, executing MCP capabilities, configuring multi-server setups, designing tools for AI agents.
react-native-skia
IncludedDesign, build, debug, and optimise high-polish animated graphics in React Native or Expo using @shopify/react-native-skia, Reanimated, and Gesture Handler. Use when the user wants canvas-driven UI, shaders, paths, rich text, image filters, sprite fields, Skottie, video frames, snapshots, web CanvasKit setup, or performance tuning for custom motion-heavy elements such as loaders, hero art, cards, charts, progress indicators, particle systems, or gesture-driven surfaces. Also use when the user asks for fluid, glow, glass, blob, parallax, 60fps/120fps, or GPU-friendly animated effects in React Native, even if they do not explicitly say "Skia". Do not use for ordinary form/layout work with standard views.
plaid
IncludedProduct Led AI Development — guides founders from idea to launched product. Six capabilities: Idea (discover a product idea), Validate (pressure-test the idea against fatal flaws, problem reality, competition, and 2-week MVP feasibility), Plan (vision intake + document generation), Design (translate image references into a design.md spec), Launch (go-to-market strategy), and Build (roadmap execution). Use when someone says "PLAID", "plaid idea", "help me find an idea", "product idea", "idea from my business", "idea from my expertise", "plaid validate", "validate my idea", "pressure-test", "is this idea good", "find fatal flaws", "validate the problem", "plan a product", "define my vision", "generate a PRD", "product strategy", "plaid design", "design from image", "translate image to design", "create design.md", "extract design tokens", "plaid launch", "go-to-market", "launch plan", "GTM strategy", "launch playbook", "plaid build", "build the app", "start building", or "execute the roadmap".
nextjs-framer-motion-animations
IncludedAdds production-safe Motion for React or Framer Motion animations to Next.js apps, including reveal, hover and tap micro-interactions, whileInView, stagger, AnimatePresence, layout and layoutId transitions, reorder, scroll-linked UI, and lightweight route-content transitions. Use when the user asks to add, refactor, or debug Motion or Framer Motion in App Router or Pages Router codebases, especially around server/client boundaries, reduced motion, LazyMotion, bundle size, hydration, or route transitions. Avoid for GSAP-style timelines, WebGL or 3D scenes, heavy scroll storytelling, or CSS-only effects unless Motion is explicitly requested.