tooluniverse-gwas-snp-interpretation
Interpret a single GWAS SNP across multiple databases — GWAS Catalog hits, LD/haplotype context, eQTL evidence, regulatory annotation, ClinVar pathogenicity, gnomAD frequency. Use for 'what does this SNP do', SNP-to-mechanism tracing, and resolving lead-SNP-vs-causal-variant ambiguity. Always considers LD structure before claiming a SNP is mechanistically responsible.
What this skill does
# GWAS SNP Interpretation Skill
**SNP interpretation**: a GWAS hit is a REGION, not a single causal variant. The lead SNP may not be causal — it may be in LD with the causal variant. Always check LD structure and functional annotation before concluding a specific SNP is mechanistically responsible. Use `LDlink_get_proxies(variant="rs...", population="EUR")` to retrieve the high-R² LD proxies (needs a free LDLINK_TOKEN) — a proxy in a coding/regulatory region is a better mechanistic candidate than the lead SNP itself. Fine-mapping (SuSiE, FINEMAP credible sets) narrows the causal set but rarely identifies a single variant with certainty. L2G scores integrate eQTL, chromatin interaction, and distance data to predict the causal gene — a lead SNP mapping to gene A may actually regulate gene B 500 kb away via a distal enhancer.
**LOOK UP DON'T GUESS**: never assume a SNP's functional consequence, mapped gene, or population frequency — always call `gwas_get_snp_by_id` and `OpenTargets_get_variant_info` to retrieve current annotations.
## Overview
Interpret genetic variants (SNPs) from GWAS studies by aggregating evidence from multiple sources to provide comprehensive clinical and biological context.
**Use Cases:**
- "Interpret rs7903146" (TCF7L2 diabetes variant)
- "What diseases is rs429358 associated with?" (APOE Alzheimer's variant)
- "Clinical significance of rs1801133" (MTHFR variant)
- "Is rs12913832 in any fine-mapped loci?" (Eye color variant)
## What It Does
The skill provides a comprehensive interpretation of SNPs by:
1. **SNP Annotation**: Retrieves basic variant information including genomic coordinates, alleles, functional consequence, and mapped genes
2. **Association Discovery**: Finds all GWAS trait/disease associations with statistical significance
3. **Fine-Mapping Evidence**: Identifies credible sets the variant belongs to (fine-mapped causal loci)
4. **Gene Mapping**: Uses Locus-to-Gene (L2G) predictions to identify likely causal genes
5. **Clinical Summary**: Aggregates evidence into actionable clinical significance
## Workflow
```
User Input: rs7903146
↓
[1] SNP Lookup
→ Get location, consequence, MAF
→ gwas_get_snp_by_id
↓
[2] Association Search
→ Find all trait/disease associations
→ gwas_get_associations_for_snp
↓
[3] Fine-Mapping (Optional)
→ Get credible set membership
→ OpenTargets_get_variant_credible_sets
↓
[4] Gene Predictions
→ Extract L2G scores for causal genes
→ (embedded in credible sets)
↓
[5] Clinical Summary
→ Aggregate evidence
→ Identify key traits and genes
↓
Output: Comprehensive Interpretation Report
```
## Data Sources
### GWAS Catalog (EMBL-EBI)
- **SNP annotations**: Functional consequences, mapped genes, population frequencies
- **Associations**: P-values, effect sizes, study metadata
- **Coverage**: 350,000+ publications, 670,000+ associations
### Open Targets Genetics
- **Fine-mapping**: Statistical credible sets from SuSiE, FINEMAP methods
- **L2G predictions**: Machine learning-based gene prioritization
- **Colocalization**: QTL evidence for causal genes
- **Coverage**: UK Biobank, FinnGen, and other large cohorts
## Input Parameters
### Required
- `rs_id` (str): dbSNP rs identifier
- Format: "rs" + number (e.g., "rs7903146")
- Must be valid rsID in GWAS Catalog
### Optional
- `include_credible_sets` (bool, default=True): Query fine-mapping data
- True: Complete interpretation (slower, ~10-30s)
- False: Fast associations only (~2-5s)
- `p_threshold` (float, default=5e-8): Genome-wide significance threshold
- `max_associations` (int, default=100): Maximum associations to retrieve
## Output Format
Returns `SNPInterpretationReport` containing:
### 1. SNP Basic Info
```python
{
'rs_id': 'rs7903146',
'chromosome': '10',
'position': 112998590,
'ref_allele': 'C',
'alt_allele': 'T',
'consequence': 'intron_variant',
'mapped_genes': ['TCF7L2'],
'maf': 0.293
}
```
### 2. Trait Associations
```python
[
{
'trait': 'Type 2 diabetes',
'p_value': 1.2e-128,
'beta': '0.28 unit increase',
'study_id': 'GCST010555',
'pubmed_id': '33536258',
'effect_allele': 'T'
},
...
]
```
### 3. Credible Sets (Fine-Mapping)
```python
[
{
'study_id': 'GCST90476118',
'trait': 'Renal failure',
'finemapping_method': 'SuSiE-inf',
'p_value': 3.5e-42,
'predicted_genes': [
{'gene': 'TCF7L2', 'score': 0.863}
],
'region': '10:112950000-113050000'
},
...
]
```
### 4. Clinical Significance
```
Genome-wide significant associations with 100 traits/diseases:
- Type 2 diabetes
- Diabetic retinopathy
- HbA1c levels
...
Identified in 20 fine-mapped loci.
Predicted causal genes: TCF7L2
```
## Example Usage
See `QUICK_START.md` for platform-specific examples.
## Tools Used
### GWAS Catalog Tools
1. `gwas_get_snp_by_id`: Get SNP annotation
2. `gwas_get_associations_for_snp`: Get all trait associations
### Open Targets Tools
3. `OpenTargets_get_variant_info`: Get variant details with population frequencies
4. `OpenTargets_get_variant_credible_sets`: Get fine-mapping credible sets with L2G
## Interpretation Guide
### P-value Significance Levels
- **p < 5e-8**: Genome-wide significant (strong evidence)
- **p < 5e-6**: Suggestive (moderate evidence)
- **p < 0.05**: Nominal (weak evidence)
### L2G Score Interpretation
- **> 0.5**: High confidence causal gene
- **0.1-0.5**: Moderate confidence
- **< 0.1**: Low confidence
### Clinical Actionability
1. **High**: Multiple genome-wide significant associations + in credible sets + high L2G scores
2. **Moderate**: Genome-wide significant associations but limited fine-mapping
3. **Low**: Suggestive associations or limited replication
## Limitations
1. **Variant ID Conversion**: OpenTargets requires chr_pos_ref_alt format, which may need allele lookup
2. **Population Specificity**: Associations may vary by ancestry
3. **Effect Sizes**: Beta values are study-dependent (different phenotype scales)
4. **Causality**: Associations don't prove causation; fine-mapping improves confidence
5. **Currency**: Data reflects published GWAS; latest studies may not be included
## Best Practices
1. **Use Full Interpretation**: Enable `include_credible_sets=True` for clinical decisions
2. **Check Multiple Variants**: Look at other variants in the same locus
3. **Validate Populations**: Consider ancestry-specific effect sizes
4. **Review Publications**: Check original studies for context
5. **Integrate Evidence**: Combine with functional data, eQTLs, pQTLs
## Technical Notes
### Performance
- **Fast mode** (no credible sets): 2-5 seconds
- **Full mode** (with credible sets): 10-30 seconds
- **Bottleneck**: OpenTargets GraphQL API rate limits
### Error Handling
- Invalid rs_id: Returns error message
- No associations: Returns empty list with note
- API failures: Graceful degradation (returns partial results)
## Related Skills
- **Gene Function Analysis**: Interpret predicted causal genes
- **Disease Ontology Lookup**: Understand trait classifications
- **PubMed Literature Search**: Find original GWAS publications
- **Variant Effect Prediction**: Functional consequence analysis
## References
1. GWAS Catalog: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/
2. Open Targets Genetics: https://genetics.opentargets.org/
3. GWAS Significance Thresholds: Fadista et al. 2016
4. L2G Method: Mountjoy et al. 2021 (Nature Genetics)
## Version
- **Version**: 1.0.0
- **Last Updated**: 2026-02-13
- **ToolUniverse Version**: >= 1.0.0
- **Tools Required**: gwas_get_snp_by_id, gwas_get_associations_for_snp, OpenTargets_get_variant_credible_sets
Related in Sales & CRM
process-mapper
IncludedUse when a BizOps lead, COO, or process-improvement owner needs to document an end-to-end business process (procurement, employee onboarding, incident handoff, customer-onboarding, claims adjudication) in BPMN-style notation, measure cycle times by stage, surface where work spends most of its time waiting vs. being worked, and quantify the gap between processing time and total elapsed time. Pairs Lean / Six Sigma / Theory-of-Constraints canon with deterministic stdlib-only Python tools to produce a process map, a ranked bottleneck list (with severity + root-cause hypothesis), and a cycle-time analysis (P50, P90, value-add ratio, Little's-Law throughput). Distinct from sales-pipeline, system-reliability (SLO), and strategic-OKR work — this is tactical process documentation for internal operations.
payment-integration
IncludedIntegrate payments with SePay (VietQR), Polar, Stripe, Paddle (MoR subscriptions), Creem.io (licensing). Checkout, webhooks, subscriptions, QR codes, multi-provider orders.
customer-success-manager
IncludedMonitors customer health, predicts churn risk, and identifies expansion opportunities using weighted scoring models for SaaS customer success
sales-engineer
IncludedAnalyzes RFP/RFI responses for coverage gaps, builds competitive feature comparison matrices, and plans proof-of-concept (POC) engagements for pre-sales engineering. Use when responding to RFPs, bids, or proposal requests; comparing product features against competitors; planning or scoring a customer POC or sales demo; preparing a technical proposal; or performing win/loss competitor analysis. Handles tasks described as 'RFP response', 'bid response', 'proposal response', 'competitor comparison', 'feature matrix', 'POC planning', 'sales demo prep', or 'pre-sales engineering'.
customer-success-manager
IncludedMonitors customer health, predicts churn risk, and identifies expansion opportunities using weighted scoring models for SaaS customer success
sales-engineer
IncludedAnalyzes RFP/RFI responses for coverage gaps, builds competitive feature comparison matrices, and plans proof-of-concept (POC) engagements for pre-sales engineering. Use when responding to RFPs, bids, or proposal requests; comparing product features against competitors; planning or scoring a customer POC or sales demo; preparing a technical proposal; or performing win/loss competitor analysis. Handles tasks described as 'RFP response', 'bid response', 'proposal response', 'competitor comparison', 'feature matrix', 'POC planning', 'sales demo prep', or 'pre-sales engineering'.