update-claude-learnings
Extract a validated learning about Claude Code behavior from the current session and add it to the project's CLAUDE.md memory file. User-only maintenance workflow for updating durable main-agent instructions after a session reveals a rule that should persist.
What this skill does
<EXTREMELY-IMPORTANT> This skill updates durable Claude memory and must stay disciplined. Non-negotiable rules: 1. Only record learnings about Claude Code behavior or workflow in this project. 2. Reject application-code, subagent, or skill-authoring learnings and route them to the proper maintenance workflow instead. 3. Check for duplicates or near-duplicates before writing. 4. Get explicit user confirmation before modifying `CLAUDE.md`. 5. Preserve existing structure and only add the smallest correct instruction. </EXTREMELY-IMPORTANT> # Update Claude Learnings ## Inputs - `$request`: Optional learning candidate, category hint, or reminder about what the session revealed ## Goal Add one validated Claude-behavior learning to project memory by: - extracting the right rule from the session - verifying it belongs in `CLAUDE.md` - placing it in the correct section - preserving the surrounding memory structure - reporting exactly what changed ## Step 0: Confirm the learning belongs here This skill is only for persistent Claude Code behavior in this project. Valid examples: - workflow rules for when Claude should use a specific skill - scope-control rules for how Claude should ask before expanding work - session-management rules for checkpoints, progress updates, or stopping conditions - project-specific Claude behavior that improves future sessions Invalid examples: - application implementation rules better suited for agent files - skill-authoring patterns better suited for skill learnings - transient one-off notes that do not deserve durable memory Load `references/learning-scope.md` for routing, category placement, and failure modes. If the learning does not belong in `CLAUDE.md`, stop and say where it should go instead. **Success criteria**: The learning clearly belongs in persistent Claude project memory. ## Step 1: Extract one concrete learning from the session Review the session and identify the smallest useful rule. Rules: - prefer one precise learning over several vague ones - write it in imperative mood - tie it to a concrete behavior, not a general aspiration - avoid duplicating rules that are already implied by stronger existing guidance Good shape: - "Use `/commit` instead of manual git commit flows when the user explicitly asks to commit." - "Ask before expanding a bugfix into adjacent refactors." Bad shape: - "Be more careful." - "Use better workflows." **Success criteria**: You have a single actionable learning candidate with a clear rationale. ## Step 2: Check the current CLAUDE memory and choose placement Read the project `CLAUDE.md`. If it does not exist, use `references/claude-md-template.md` as the structural fallback. Choose the correct section: - `Workflow Rules` - `Session Management` - `Scope Control` - `Behavioral Patterns` Before writing: - search for duplicates or near-duplicates - merge with existing wording if a similar rule already exists - keep the new instruction small and local Load `references/learning-scope.md` for placement and duplicate-handling guidance. **Success criteria**: The target section is known and duplication risk has been checked. ## Step 3: Confirm with the user Before editing `CLAUDE.md`, present: - category - final wording - reason this learning was extracted - intended section placement Use `AskUserQuestion` if confirmation or wording refinement is needed. Do not write until the user explicitly approves the learning. **Success criteria**: The user has approved the learning and its placement. ## Step 4: Update CLAUDE.md Apply the minimal correct edit: - preserve file structure - insert the learning in the chosen section - avoid deleting unrelated content - update the "Last updated" marker only if the file already uses one Rules: - if `CLAUDE.md` is missing, create it using the provided template and then add the learning - if the section is missing, create the smallest compatible section rather than restructuring the whole file - keep formatting consistent with the existing document **Success criteria**: `CLAUDE.md` contains the approved learning in the right place without collateral churn. ## Step 5: Verify and report Verify: - the learning was added exactly once - the file structure still makes sense - the instruction remains actionable and specific - the update did not drift into agent or skill memory territory Report: - category - section path - final wording - whether the file was created or updated **Success criteria**: The user can see exactly what durable Claude memory changed. ## Guardrails - Do not let the model invoke this skill proactively; it mutates durable memory. - Do not add `context: fork`; this workflow edits the active repository. - Do not add `paths:`; this is a generic maintenance skill. - Do not keep routing matrices, quality scorecards, or long failure catalogs inline in `SKILL.md`. - Do not add a learning without explicit user approval. - Do not rewrite large parts of `CLAUDE.md` when a small targeted insertion is enough. ## When To Load References - `references/learning-scope.md` Use for deciding whether the learning belongs in Claude memory, choosing section placement, handling duplicates, and checking common failure modes. - `references/claude-md-template.md` Use only when `CLAUDE.md` is missing or its structure needs a minimal compatible fallback. ## Output Contract Report: 1. whether the learning was accepted or redirected elsewhere 2. the chosen category and section 3. the final approved wording 4. whether `CLAUDE.md` was created or updated 5. any duplicate merge or placement decisions
Related in AI Agents
skill-development
IncludedComprehensive meta-skill for creating, managing, validating, auditing, and distributing Claude Code skills and slash commands (unified in v2.1.3+). Provides skill templates, creation workflows, validation patterns, audit checklists, naming conventions, YAML frontmatter guidance, progressive disclosure examples, and best practices lookup. Use when creating new skills, validating existing skills, auditing skill quality, understanding skill architecture, needing skill templates, learning about YAML frontmatter requirements, progressive disclosure patterns, tool restrictions (allowed-tools), skill composition, skill naming conventions, troubleshooting skill activation issues, creating custom slash commands, configuring command frontmatter, using command arguments ($ARGUMENTS, $1, $2), bash execution in commands, file references in commands, command namespacing, plugin commands, MCP slash commands, Skill tool configuration, or deciding between skills vs slash commands. Delegates to docs-management skill for official documentation.
reprompter
IncludedTransform messy prompts into well-structured, effective prompts — single or multi-agent. Use when: "reprompt", "reprompt this", "clean up this prompt", "structure my prompt", rough text needing XML tags and best practices, "reprompter teams", "repromptception", "run with quality", "smart run", "smart agents", multi-agent tasks, audits, parallel work, anything going to agent teams. Don't use when: simple Q&A, pure chat, immediate execution-only tasks. See "Don't Use When" section for details. Outputs: Structured XML/Markdown prompt, quality score (before/after), optional team brief + per-agent sub-prompts, agent team output files. Success criteria: Single mode quality score ≥ 7/10; Repromptception per-agent prompt quality score 8+/10; all required sections present, actionable and specific.
adaptive-compaction
IncludedAdaptive add-on policy and recovery layer that decides WHEN to compact, prune, snapshot, or fork -- replacing fixed-percent auto-compaction across Claude Code, Codex, and MCP-capable hosts. Trigger on auto-compact timing or damage: "when should I compact", "is it safe to compact now or start a fresh session", "auto-compact fires too early/mid-task", "switching to an unrelated task but the window still has space", "context rot", "answers get worse the longer the session runs", "the agent forgot the plan or my decisions after it summarized", "add a layer on top that manages context without changing the agent", raising autoCompactWindow to give the policy room, or installing/tuning a cross-tool compaction policy or PreCompact hook -- even when "compaction" is never said but the problem is context-window pressure or post-summarization memory loss. Do NOT use to summarize a conversation, build RAG, write a summarization prompt (decides WHEN not HOW), or answer max-context-length trivia.
agent-skill-creator
IncludedCreate cross-platform agent skills from workflow descriptions. Activates when users ask to create an agent, automate a repetitive workflow, create a custom skill, or need advanced agent creation. Triggers on phrases like create agent for, automate workflow, create skill for, every day I have to, daily I need to, turn process into agent, need to automate, create a cross-platform skill, validate this skill, export this skill, migrate this skill. Supports single skills, multi-agent suites, transcript processing, template-based creation, interactive configuration, cross-platform export, and spec validation.
llm-wiki
IncludedUse when building or maintaining a persistent personal knowledge base (second brain) in Obsidian where an LLM incrementally ingests sources, updates entity/concept pages, maintains cross-references, and keeps a synthesis current. Triggers include "second brain", "Obsidian wiki", "personal knowledge management", "ingest this paper/article/book", "build a research wiki", "compound knowledge", "Memex", or whenever the user wants knowledge to accumulate across sessions instead of being re-derived by RAG on every query.
skill-master
IncludedAgent Skills authoring, evaluation, and optimization. Create, edit, validate, benchmark, and improve skills following the agentskills.io specification. Use when designing SKILL.md files, structuring skill folders (references, scripts, assets), ingesting external documentation into skills, running trigger evals, benchmarking skill quality, optimizing descriptions, or performing blind A/B comparisons. Keywords: agentskills.io, SKILL.md, skill authoring, eval, benchmark, trigger optimization.