update-spec
Captures executable contracts and coding knowledge into .trellis/spec/ documents after implementation, debugging, or design decisions. Enforces code-spec depth for infra and cross-layer changes with mandatory sections for signatures, contracts, validation matrices, and test points. Use when a feature is implemented, a bug is fixed, a design decision is made, a new pattern is discovered, or cross-layer contracts change.
What this skill does
# Update Code-Spec - Capture Executable Contracts
When you learn something valuable (from debugging, implementing, or discussion), use this skill to update the relevant code-spec documents.
**Timing**: After completing a task, fixing a bug, or discovering a new pattern
---
## Code-Spec First Rule (CRITICAL)
In this project, "spec" for implementation work means **code-spec**:
- Executable contracts (not principle-only text)
- Concrete signatures, payload fields, env keys, and boundary behavior
- Testable validation/error behavior
If the change touches infra or cross-layer contracts, code-spec depth is mandatory.
Required sections for infra/cross-layer specs:
1. Scope / Trigger
2. Signatures (command/API/DB)
3. Contracts (request/response/env)
4. Validation & Error Matrix
5. Good/Base/Bad Cases
6. Tests Required (with assertion points)
7. Wrong vs Correct (at least one pair)
---
## When to Update Code-Specs
| Trigger | Example | Target Spec |
|---------|---------|-------------|
| **Implemented a feature** | Added template download with giget | Relevant `backend/` or `frontend/` file |
| **Made a design decision** | Used type field + mapping table for extensibility | Relevant code-spec + "Design Decisions" section |
| **Fixed a bug** | Found a subtle issue with error handling | `backend/error-handling.md` |
| **Discovered a pattern** | Found a better way to structure code | Relevant `backend/` or `frontend/` file |
| **Hit a gotcha** | Learned that X must be done before Y | Relevant code-spec + "Common Mistakes" section |
| **Established a convention** | Team agreed on naming pattern | `quality-guidelines.md` |
| **New thinking trigger** | "Don't forget to check X before doing Y" | `guides/*.md` (as a checklist item, not detailed rules) |
**Key Insight**: Code-spec updates are NOT just for problems. Every feature implementation contains design decisions and contracts that future AI/developers need to execute safely.
---
## Spec Structure Overview
```
.trellis/spec/
├── backend/ # Backend coding standards
│ ├── index.md # Overview and links
│ └── *.md # Topic-specific guidelines
├── frontend/ # Frontend coding standards
│ ├── index.md # Overview and links
│ └── *.md # Topic-specific guidelines
└── guides/ # Thinking checklists (NOT coding specs!)
├── index.md # Guide index
└── *.md # Topic-specific guides
```
### CRITICAL: Code-Spec vs Guide - Know the Difference
| Type | Location | Purpose | Content Style |
|------|----------|---------|---------------|
| **Code-Spec** | `backend/*.md`, `frontend/*.md` | Tell AI "how to implement safely" | Signatures, contracts, matrices, cases, test points |
| **Guide** | `guides/*.md` | Help AI "what to think about" | Checklists, questions, pointers to specs |
**Decision Rule**: Ask yourself:
- "This is **how to write** the code" → Put in `backend/` or `frontend/`
- "This is **what to consider** before writing" → Put in `guides/`
**Example**:
| Learning | Wrong Location | Correct Location |
|----------|----------------|------------------|
| "Use `reconfigure()` not `TextIOWrapper` for Windows stdout" | ❌ `guides/cross-platform-thinking-guide.md` | ✅ `backend/script-conventions.md` |
| "Remember to check encoding when writing cross-platform code" | ❌ `backend/script-conventions.md` | ✅ `guides/cross-platform-thinking-guide.md` |
**Guides should be short checklists that point to specs**, not duplicate the detailed rules.
---
## Update Process
### Step 1: Identify What You Learned
Answer these questions:
1. **What did you learn?** (Be specific)
2. **Why is it important?** (What problem does it prevent?)
3. **Where does it belong?** (Which spec file?)
### Step 2: Classify the Update Type
| Type | Description | Action |
|------|-------------|--------|
| **Design Decision** | Why we chose approach X over Y | Add to "Design Decisions" section |
| **Project Convention** | How we do X in this project | Add to relevant section with examples |
| **New Pattern** | A reusable approach discovered | Add to "Patterns" section |
| **Forbidden Pattern** | Something that causes problems | Add to "Anti-patterns" or "Don't" section |
| **Common Mistake** | Easy-to-make error | Add to "Common Mistakes" section |
| **Convention** | Agreed-upon standard | Add to relevant section |
| **Gotcha** | Non-obvious behavior | Add warning callout |
### Step 3: Read the Target Code-Spec
Before editing, read the current code-spec to:
- Understand existing structure
- Avoid duplicating content
- Find the right section for your update
```bash
cat .trellis/spec/<category>/<file>.md
```
### Step 4: Make the Update
Follow these principles:
1. **Be Specific**: Include concrete examples, not just abstract rules
2. **Explain Why**: State the problem this prevents
3. **Show Contracts**: Add signatures, payload fields, and error behavior
4. **Show Code**: Add code snippets for key patterns
5. **Keep it Short**: One concept per section
### Step 5: Update the Index (if needed)
If you added a new section or the code-spec status changed, update the category's `index.md`.
---
## Update Templates
### Mandatory Template for Infra/Cross-Layer Work
```markdown
## Scenario: <name>
### 1. Scope / Trigger
- Trigger: <why this requires code-spec depth>
### 2. Signatures
### 3. Contracts
### 4. Validation & Error Matrix
### 5. Good/Base/Bad Cases
### 6. Tests Required
### 7. Wrong vs Correct
#### Wrong
...
#### Correct
...
```
### Adding a Design Decision
```markdown
### Design Decision: [Decision Name]
**Context**: What problem were we solving?
**Options Considered**:
1. Option A - brief description
2. Option B - brief description
**Decision**: We chose Option X because...
**Example**:
\`\`\`typescript
// How it's implemented
code example
\`\`\`
**Extensibility**: How to extend this in the future...
```
### Adding a Project Convention
```markdown
### Convention: [Convention Name]
**What**: Brief description of the convention.
**Why**: Why we do it this way in this project.
**Example**:
\`\`\`typescript
// How to follow this convention
code example
\`\`\`
**Related**: Links to related conventions or specs.
```
### Adding a New Pattern
```markdown
### Pattern Name
**Problem**: What problem does this solve?
**Solution**: Brief description of the approach.
**Example**:
\`\`\`
// Good
code example
// Bad
code example
\`\`\`
**Why**: Explanation of why this works better.
```
### Adding a Forbidden Pattern
```markdown
### Don't: Pattern Name
**Problem**:
\`\`\`
// Don't do this
bad code example
\`\`\`
**Why it's bad**: Explanation of the issue.
**Instead**:
\`\`\`
// Do this instead
good code example
\`\`\`
```
### Adding a Common Mistake
```markdown
### Common Mistake: Description
**Symptom**: What goes wrong
**Cause**: Why this happens
**Fix**: How to correct it
**Prevention**: How to avoid it in the future
```
### Adding a Gotcha
```markdown
> **Warning**: Brief description of the non-obvious behavior.
>
> Details about when this happens and how to handle it.
```
---
## Interactive Mode
If you're unsure what to update, answer these prompts:
1. **What did you just finish?**
- [ ] Fixed a bug
- [ ] Implemented a feature
- [ ] Refactored code
- [ ] Had a discussion about approach
2. **What did you learn or decide?**
- Design decision (why X over Y)
- Project convention (how we do X)
- Non-obvious behavior (gotcha)
- Better approach (pattern)
3. **Would future AI/developers need to know this?**
- To understand how the code works → Yes, update spec
- To maintain or extend the feature → Yes, update spec
- To avoid repeating mistakes → Yes, update spec
- Purely one-off implementation detail → Maybe skip
4. **Which area does it relate to?**
- [ ] Backend code
- [ ] Frontend code
- [ ] Cross-layer data flow
- [ ] Code organization/reuse
- [ ] Quality/testing
---Related in Design
contribute
IncludedLocal-only OSS contribution command center. Auto-refreshes the user's in-flight PR and issue state on invoke so conversations start with full context — no need to brief Claude on what's in flight. Helps the user find issues to contribute to on GitHub, builds per-repo dossiers of what each upstream expects (CLA, DCO, branch convention, AI policy, draft-first, review bots, issue templates), runs deterministic gates before any external action so AI-assisted contributions don't reach maintainers as slop. State is markdown-only: candidate files at ~/.contribute-system/candidates/, repo dossiers at ~/.contribute-system/research/, append-only event log at ~/.contribute-system/log.jsonl. No database, no cloud calls. Use when the user asks about their PRs / issues / contributions, wants to find new work to take on, claim an issue, build/refresh a repo's dossier, or draft a Design Issue or PR. Trigger with "/contribute", "what's my PR status", "find a contribution", "claim issue X", "draft a Design Issue for Y", "refresh dossier for Z".
architectural-analysis
IncludedUser-triggered deep architectural analysis of a codebase or scoped subtree across eight modes — information architecture, data flow, integration points, UI surfaces, interaction patterns, data model, control flow, and failure modes. This skill should be used when the user asks to "diagram this codebase," "map the architecture," "show the data flow," "give me an ERD," "trace control flow," "find the integration points," "verify the layout pattern," "audit the UX architecture," or any similar request whose primary deliverable is mermaid diagrams plus cited reports under docs/architecture/. Dispatches haiku/sonnet sub-agents in parallel for per-mode exploration, then verifies every citation mechanically before any node lands in a diagram. Not for one-off prose explanations of code (use code-explanation) or for high-level system design from scratch (use system-design).
mcp
IncludedModel Context Protocol (MCP) server development and tool management. Languages: Python, TypeScript. Capabilities: build MCP servers, integrate external APIs, discover/execute MCP tools, manage multi-server configs, design agent-centric tools. Actions: create, build, integrate, discover, execute, configure MCP servers/tools. Keywords: MCP, Model Context Protocol, MCP server, MCP tool, stdio transport, SSE transport, tool discovery, resource provider, prompt template, external API integration, Gemini CLI MCP, Claude MCP, agent tools, tool execution, server config. Use when: building MCP servers, integrating external APIs as MCP tools, discovering available MCP tools, executing MCP capabilities, configuring multi-server setups, designing tools for AI agents.
react-native-skia
IncludedDesign, build, debug, and optimise high-polish animated graphics in React Native or Expo using @shopify/react-native-skia, Reanimated, and Gesture Handler. Use when the user wants canvas-driven UI, shaders, paths, rich text, image filters, sprite fields, Skottie, video frames, snapshots, web CanvasKit setup, or performance tuning for custom motion-heavy elements such as loaders, hero art, cards, charts, progress indicators, particle systems, or gesture-driven surfaces. Also use when the user asks for fluid, glow, glass, blob, parallax, 60fps/120fps, or GPU-friendly animated effects in React Native, even if they do not explicitly say "Skia". Do not use for ordinary form/layout work with standard views.
plaid
IncludedProduct Led AI Development — guides founders from idea to launched product. Six capabilities: Idea (discover a product idea), Validate (pressure-test the idea against fatal flaws, problem reality, competition, and 2-week MVP feasibility), Plan (vision intake + document generation), Design (translate image references into a design.md spec), Launch (go-to-market strategy), and Build (roadmap execution). Use when someone says "PLAID", "plaid idea", "help me find an idea", "product idea", "idea from my business", "idea from my expertise", "plaid validate", "validate my idea", "pressure-test", "is this idea good", "find fatal flaws", "validate the problem", "plan a product", "define my vision", "generate a PRD", "product strategy", "plaid design", "design from image", "translate image to design", "create design.md", "extract design tokens", "plaid launch", "go-to-market", "launch plan", "GTM strategy", "launch playbook", "plaid build", "build the app", "start building", or "execute the roadmap".
nextjs-framer-motion-animations
IncludedAdds production-safe Motion for React or Framer Motion animations to Next.js apps, including reveal, hover and tap micro-interactions, whileInView, stagger, AnimatePresence, layout and layoutId transitions, reorder, scroll-linked UI, and lightweight route-content transitions. Use when the user asks to add, refactor, or debug Motion or Framer Motion in App Router or Pages Router codebases, especially around server/client boundaries, reduced motion, LazyMotion, bundle size, hydration, or route transitions. Avoid for GSAP-style timelines, WebGL or 3D scenes, heavy scroll storytelling, or CSS-only effects unless Motion is explicitly requested.