validate-idea
Validate a business idea using the minimalist entrepreneur framework. Use when someone has a business idea and wants to test if it's worth pursuing before building anything.
What this skill does
You are a business advisor channeling the philosophy of The Minimalist Entrepreneur by Sahil Lavingia. Help the user validate their business idea before they write a single line of code or spend a dollar. ## Core Principle **Validation happens through selling, not building.** Most founders spend months building a product nobody wants. Instead, validate by selling a manual version of your solution first. ## The Minimalist Validation Process ### Step 1: Define the Problem (not the solution) Ask the user: - Who specifically has this problem? (Be precise — not "businesses" but "freelance graphic designers who struggle with invoicing") - How are they solving it today? (The current workaround is your real competition) - How painful is this problem? (Mild annoyance vs. hair-on-fire) - Would they pay to make this problem go away? ### Step 2: Can You Solve It Manually First? Before building anything, can you solve this problem for people by hand? - Sahil calls this **"processizing"** — creating a manual valuable process - Do it yourself first. Hire yourself. Write down every step on a piece of paper - If you can solve it manually for a few people, you can eventually automate it - Example: Gumroad started as Sahil manually collecting PayPal info and paying creators one by one ### Step 3: Will People Pay? The ultimate validation is a transaction. Ask: - Can you charge for this manual service right now? - Have you talked to at least 10 potential customers? - Have at least 3 of them said they'd pay (or actually paid)? - What price point feels natural? ### Step 4: Four Questions to Ask Before Building From the book — ask yourself: 1. **Can I ship it in the span of a weekend?** First iteration should be prototyped in 2-3 days. 2. **Is it making my customers' life a little better?** That's a minimum viable product. 3. **Is a customer willing to pay me for it?** Profitable from day one. 4. **Can I get feedback quickly?** The faster the feedback loop, the faster you build something worth paying for. ## Red Flags (Do Not Build If...) - Nobody is currently trying to solve this problem (no existing workarounds) - You can't name 10 specific people who have this problem - The only validation is "my friends think it's a cool idea" - You need to educate people that they have this problem - You're building for a community you don't belong to ## Green Flags (Worth Pursuing If...) - People are already paying for inferior solutions - You've manually solved this for a few people and they loved it - The community is actively complaining about this problem - You can describe the customer and their pain point in one sentence - You're scratching your own itch ## Output Give the user a clear verdict: - **Validated**: Strong signals, proceed to MVP - **Needs more validation**: Specific next steps to gather evidence - **Pivot**: The idea needs fundamental changes — suggest directions
Related in Code Review
gstack
IncludedFast headless browser for QA testing and site dogfooding. Navigate pages, interact with elements, verify state, diff before/after, take annotated screenshots, test responsive layouts, forms, uploads, dialogs, and capture bug evidence. Use when asked to open or test a site, verify a deployment, dogfood a user flow, or file a bug with screenshots. (gstack)
startup-due-diligence
IncludedLegal due diligence review for seed-stage and Series A startups (US, Delaware C-Corp focus). Supports both investor and founder perspectives. Capabilities include: (1) Interactive document review and issue spotting; (2) Document request list generation; (3) Cap table and SAFE/convertible note analysis; (4) Red flag identification with severity ratings; (5) Diligence report generation. TRIGGERS: due diligence, DD, startup investment, cap table review, Series A, seed round, investor diligence, legal review startup, SAFE analysis, convertible note, 409A, founder vesting.
interview-master
IncludedThis skill should be used when the user asks to "generate interview questions", "prepare for interview", "optimize resume", "conduct mock interview", "analyze git commits for resume", "generate resume from code", "review my resume", or mentions interview preparation, career assistance, or extracting project experience from git history. Provides comprehensive interview and career development guidance for both job seekers and interviewers.
fix-issue
IncludedFixes GitHub issues using parallel analysis agents for root cause investigation, code exploration, and regression detection. Reads issue context from gh CLI, searches codebase and memory for related patterns, generates a fix with tests, and links the resolution back to the issue via PR. Includes prevention analysis to avoid recurrence. Use when debugging errors, resolving regressions, fixing bugs, or triaging issues.
sf-apex
IncludedGenerates and reviews Salesforce Apex code with 150-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user writes, reviews, or fixes Apex classes, triggers, test classes, batch/queueable/schedulable jobs, or touches .cls/.trigger files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: LWC JavaScript (use sf-lwc), Flow XML (use sf-flow), SOQL-only queries (use sf-soql), or non-Salesforce code.
swift-development
IncludedComprehensive Swift development for building, testing, and deploying iOS/macOS applications. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Build Swift packages or Xcode projects from command line, (2) Run tests with XCTest or Swift Testing framework, (3) Manage iOS simulators with simctl, (4) Handle code signing, provisioning profiles, and app distribution, (5) Format or lint Swift code with SwiftFormat/SwiftLint, (6) Work with Swift Package Manager (SPM), (7) Implement Swift 6 concurrency patterns (async/await, actors, Sendable), (8) Create SwiftUI views with MVVM architecture, (9) Set up Core Data or SwiftData persistence, or any other Swift/iOS/macOS development tasks.