validating-plugins
Use when auditing plugin structure after migration or refactoring. Scans all SKILL.md, agent, rules, and plugin manifest files for frontmatter errors, broken links, orphaned files, and invalid variables. Generates a Markdown report and proposes targeted fixes. Use when user says "validate plugin", "audit skills", "check plugin structure", "run validation after refactor".
What this skill does
# Validating Plugins
## Overview
Runs batch structural validation across all plugin components, writes a report, then proposes fixes.
**Core principle:** Validation should be cheap to run and easy to act on. The report is the source of truth — read it fully before proposing any fixes.
## Routing
**Pattern:** Skill Steps
**Handoff:** none
**Next:** none
## Task Initialization (MANDATORY)
Before ANY action, create task list using TaskCreate:
```
TaskCreate for EACH task below:
- Subject: "[validating-plugins] Task N: <action>"
- ActiveForm: "<doing action>"
```
**Tasks:**
1. Run validator script
2. Read report
3. Propose fixes
Announce: "Created 3 tasks. Starting execution..."
**Execution rules:**
1. `TaskUpdate status="in_progress"` BEFORE starting each task
2. `TaskUpdate status="completed"` ONLY after verification passes
3. NEVER skip to next task until current is completed
## Task 1: Run Validator Script
**Goal:** Execute `validate_all.py` and capture the report path.
```bash
{ command -v uv >/dev/null 2>&1 && uv run "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../hooks/validate_all.py"; } \
|| { python3 --version >/dev/null 2>&1 && python3 "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../hooks/validate_all.py"; } \
|| python "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../hooks/validate_all.py"
```
Parse stdout for:
- `report:<path>` — path to the generated Markdown report
- `issues:<N> files, <M> warnings` — summary if issues exist
- `status:clean` — no issues
**If script fails to run:** Check that `validate_all.py` exists at `plugins/rcc/hooks/validate_all.py`. If missing, stop and report.
**Verification:** Script ran, report path captured.
## Task 2: Read Report
**Goal:** Read the full validation report and understand all issues.
Read the file at the report path captured in Task 1.
For each issue entry, note:
- File path
- Warning type: `extra frontmatter field` / `broken link` / `orphaned file` / `invalid variable` / `plugin validate`
- Specific value flagged
**If no issues (`status:clean`):** Report to user that everything is valid and mark all tasks complete.
**Verification:** All issues catalogued.
## Task 3: Propose Fixes
**Goal:** For each issue, propose a concrete fix. Group by file.
**Fix patterns:**
| Warning type | Fix |
|---|---|
| `extra frontmatter field: "X"` | Remove field `X` from frontmatter (or rename if it's a valid field with wrong name) |
| `broken link: path/to/file.md` | Either create the missing file, or remove the dead link from SKILL.md |
| `orphaned file: path/to/file.md` | Either add a markdown link to SKILL.md, or delete the file if unused |
| `invalid variable: ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}` | Replace with `${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../` pattern, or move the reference to hooks/hooks.json |
| `plugin validate: <error>` | Fix the specific manifest error reported |
Present fixes grouped by file. For each file, show the exact edit needed (old → new).
Ask user to confirm before applying any fixes.
**Verification:** User has reviewed and approved (or rejected) proposed fixes.
## Red Flags - STOP
- "Skip reading the full report" — every issue needs to be seen
- "Fix issues without user approval" — always confirm before editing
- "Guess what the fix should be" — derive from the warning type table above
- "Run the script without capturing report path" — the path is needed for Task 2
## Common Rationalizations
| Excuse | Reality |
|--------|---------|
| "The validator already ran clean" | Validator checks structure, not content quality. Manual review catches semantic issues. |
| "It's just frontmatter" | Wrong frontmatter means skills don't trigger, agents get wrong tools, hooks don't fire. |
| "I'll fix it later" | Invalid plugin files silently degrade. Fix now or users hit confusing errors. |
| "Only one file has issues" | One broken link or orphaned file signals systemic neglect. Check everything. |
## Flowchart
```dot
digraph validating_plugins {
rankdir=TB;
start [label="Validate plugins", shape=doublecircle];
run [label="Task 1: Run\nvalidator script", shape=box];
script_ok [label="Script ran\nsuccessfully?", shape=diamond];
clean [label="Report: clean?", shape=diamond];
done_clean [label="All valid ✅", shape=doublecircle];
read [label="Task 2: Read\nreport", shape=box];
propose [label="Task 3: Propose\nfixes", shape=box];
approved [label="User approves\nfixes?", shape=diamond];
apply [label="Apply fixes", shape=box];
done [label="Done", shape=doublecircle];
start -> run;
run -> script_ok;
script_ok -> clean [label="yes"];
script_ok -> done [label="no — report error"];
clean -> done_clean [label="yes"];
clean -> read [label="no"];
read -> propose;
propose -> approved;
approved -> apply [label="yes"];
approved -> done [label="no — user declines"];
apply -> done;
}
```
Related in AI Agents
skill-development
IncludedComprehensive meta-skill for creating, managing, validating, auditing, and distributing Claude Code skills and slash commands (unified in v2.1.3+). Provides skill templates, creation workflows, validation patterns, audit checklists, naming conventions, YAML frontmatter guidance, progressive disclosure examples, and best practices lookup. Use when creating new skills, validating existing skills, auditing skill quality, understanding skill architecture, needing skill templates, learning about YAML frontmatter requirements, progressive disclosure patterns, tool restrictions (allowed-tools), skill composition, skill naming conventions, troubleshooting skill activation issues, creating custom slash commands, configuring command frontmatter, using command arguments ($ARGUMENTS, $1, $2), bash execution in commands, file references in commands, command namespacing, plugin commands, MCP slash commands, Skill tool configuration, or deciding between skills vs slash commands. Delegates to docs-management skill for official documentation.
reprompter
IncludedTransform messy prompts into well-structured, effective prompts — single or multi-agent. Use when: "reprompt", "reprompt this", "clean up this prompt", "structure my prompt", rough text needing XML tags and best practices, "reprompter teams", "repromptception", "run with quality", "smart run", "smart agents", multi-agent tasks, audits, parallel work, anything going to agent teams. Don't use when: simple Q&A, pure chat, immediate execution-only tasks. See "Don't Use When" section for details. Outputs: Structured XML/Markdown prompt, quality score (before/after), optional team brief + per-agent sub-prompts, agent team output files. Success criteria: Single mode quality score ≥ 7/10; Repromptception per-agent prompt quality score 8+/10; all required sections present, actionable and specific.
adaptive-compaction
IncludedAdaptive add-on policy and recovery layer that decides WHEN to compact, prune, snapshot, or fork -- replacing fixed-percent auto-compaction across Claude Code, Codex, and MCP-capable hosts. Trigger on auto-compact timing or damage: "when should I compact", "is it safe to compact now or start a fresh session", "auto-compact fires too early/mid-task", "switching to an unrelated task but the window still has space", "context rot", "answers get worse the longer the session runs", "the agent forgot the plan or my decisions after it summarized", "add a layer on top that manages context without changing the agent", raising autoCompactWindow to give the policy room, or installing/tuning a cross-tool compaction policy or PreCompact hook -- even when "compaction" is never said but the problem is context-window pressure or post-summarization memory loss. Do NOT use to summarize a conversation, build RAG, write a summarization prompt (decides WHEN not HOW), or answer max-context-length trivia.
agent-skill-creator
IncludedCreate cross-platform agent skills from workflow descriptions. Activates when users ask to create an agent, automate a repetitive workflow, create a custom skill, or need advanced agent creation. Triggers on phrases like create agent for, automate workflow, create skill for, every day I have to, daily I need to, turn process into agent, need to automate, create a cross-platform skill, validate this skill, export this skill, migrate this skill. Supports single skills, multi-agent suites, transcript processing, template-based creation, interactive configuration, cross-platform export, and spec validation.
llm-wiki
IncludedUse when building or maintaining a persistent personal knowledge base (second brain) in Obsidian where an LLM incrementally ingests sources, updates entity/concept pages, maintains cross-references, and keeps a synthesis current. Triggers include "second brain", "Obsidian wiki", "personal knowledge management", "ingest this paper/article/book", "build a research wiki", "compound knowledge", "Memex", or whenever the user wants knowledge to accumulate across sessions instead of being re-derived by RAG on every query.
skill-master
IncludedAgent Skills authoring, evaluation, and optimization. Create, edit, validate, benchmark, and improve skills following the agentskills.io specification. Use when designing SKILL.md files, structuring skill folders (references, scripts, assets), ingesting external documentation into skills, running trigger evals, benchmarking skill quality, optimizing descriptions, or performing blind A/B comparisons. Keywords: agentskills.io, SKILL.md, skill authoring, eval, benchmark, trigger optimization.