vendor-review
Evaluate a vendor — cost analysis, risk assessment, and recommendation. Use when reviewing a new vendor proposal, deciding whether to renew or replace a contract, comparing two vendors side-by-side, or building a TCO breakdown and negotiation points before procurement sign-off.
What this skill does
# /vendor-review > If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see [CONNECTORS.md](../../CONNECTORS.md). Evaluate a vendor with structured analysis covering cost, risk, performance, and fit. ## Usage ``` /vendor-review $ARGUMENTS ``` ## What I Need From You - **Vendor name**: Who are you evaluating? - **Context**: New vendor evaluation, renewal decision, or comparison? - **Details**: Contract terms, pricing, proposal document, or current performance data ## Evaluation Framework ### Cost Analysis (Total Cost of Ownership) - Total cost of ownership (not just license fees) - Implementation and migration costs - Training and onboarding costs - Ongoing support and maintenance - Exit costs (data migration, contract termination) ### Risk Assessment - Vendor financial stability - Security and compliance posture - Concentration risk (single vendor dependency) - Contract lock-in and exit terms - Business continuity and disaster recovery ### Performance Metrics - SLA compliance - Support response times - Uptime and reliability - Feature delivery cadence - Customer satisfaction ### Comparison Matrix When comparing vendors, produce a side-by-side matrix covering: pricing, features, integrations, security, support, contract terms, and references. ## Output ```markdown ## Vendor Review: [Vendor Name] **Date:** [Date] | **Type:** [New / Renewal / Comparison] ### Summary [2-3 sentence recommendation] ### Cost Analysis | Component | Annual Cost | Notes | |-----------|-------------|-------| | License/subscription | $[X] | [Per seat, flat, usage-based] | | Implementation | $[X] | [One-time] | | Support/maintenance | $[X] | [Included or add-on] | | **Total Year 1** | **$[X]** | | | **Total 3-Year** | **$[X]** | | ### Risk Assessment | Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation | |------|-----------|--------|------------| | [Risk] | High/Med/Low | High/Med/Low | [Mitigation] | ### Strengths - [Strength 1] - [Strength 2] ### Concerns - [Concern 1] - [Concern 2] ### Recommendation [Proceed / Negotiate / Pass] — [Reasoning] ### Negotiation Points - [Leverage point 1] - [Leverage point 2] ``` ## If Connectors Available If **~~knowledge base** is connected: - Search for existing vendor evaluations, contracts, and performance reviews - Pull procurement policies and approval thresholds If **~~procurement** is connected: - Pull current contract terms, spend history, and renewal dates - Compare pricing against existing vendor agreements ## Tips 1. **Upload the proposal** — I can extract pricing, terms, and SLAs from vendor documents. 2. **Compare vendors** — "Compare Vendor A vs Vendor B" gets you a side-by-side analysis. 3. **Include current spend** — For renewals, knowing what you pay now helps evaluate price changes.
Related in Code Review
gstack
IncludedFast headless browser for QA testing and site dogfooding. Navigate pages, interact with elements, verify state, diff before/after, take annotated screenshots, test responsive layouts, forms, uploads, dialogs, and capture bug evidence. Use when asked to open or test a site, verify a deployment, dogfood a user flow, or file a bug with screenshots. (gstack)
startup-due-diligence
IncludedLegal due diligence review for seed-stage and Series A startups (US, Delaware C-Corp focus). Supports both investor and founder perspectives. Capabilities include: (1) Interactive document review and issue spotting; (2) Document request list generation; (3) Cap table and SAFE/convertible note analysis; (4) Red flag identification with severity ratings; (5) Diligence report generation. TRIGGERS: due diligence, DD, startup investment, cap table review, Series A, seed round, investor diligence, legal review startup, SAFE analysis, convertible note, 409A, founder vesting.
interview-master
IncludedThis skill should be used when the user asks to "generate interview questions", "prepare for interview", "optimize resume", "conduct mock interview", "analyze git commits for resume", "generate resume from code", "review my resume", or mentions interview preparation, career assistance, or extracting project experience from git history. Provides comprehensive interview and career development guidance for both job seekers and interviewers.
fix-issue
IncludedFixes GitHub issues using parallel analysis agents for root cause investigation, code exploration, and regression detection. Reads issue context from gh CLI, searches codebase and memory for related patterns, generates a fix with tests, and links the resolution back to the issue via PR. Includes prevention analysis to avoid recurrence. Use when debugging errors, resolving regressions, fixing bugs, or triaging issues.
sf-apex
IncludedGenerates and reviews Salesforce Apex code with 150-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user writes, reviews, or fixes Apex classes, triggers, test classes, batch/queueable/schedulable jobs, or touches .cls/.trigger files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: LWC JavaScript (use sf-lwc), Flow XML (use sf-flow), SOQL-only queries (use sf-soql), or non-Salesforce code.
swift-development
IncludedComprehensive Swift development for building, testing, and deploying iOS/macOS applications. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Build Swift packages or Xcode projects from command line, (2) Run tests with XCTest or Swift Testing framework, (3) Manage iOS simulators with simctl, (4) Handle code signing, provisioning profiles, and app distribution, (5) Format or lint Swift code with SwiftFormat/SwiftLint, (6) Work with Swift Package Manager (SPM), (7) Implement Swift 6 concurrency patterns (async/await, actors, Sendable), (8) Create SwiftUI views with MVVM architecture, (9) Set up Core Data or SwiftData persistence, or any other Swift/iOS/macOS development tasks.