verification-before-completion
Evidence-before-claims discipline for implementation completion. Use before claiming any work is complete, fixed, or passing. Run verification commands and confirm output before making success claims.
What this skill does
# Verification Before Completion Evidence before claims, always. No completion claims without fresh verification. ## Purpose Claiming work is done without verification breaks trust and wastes time. This skill enforces running verification commands and confirming output before any success claim. "It should work" is not verification. ## The Iron Law **NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE.** Every claim must be backed by evidence you just observed. Not evidence from earlier. Not evidence you expect. Evidence you just saw. ## The Five-Step Gate Before any completion claim, complete these steps: ### Step 1: Identify What command proves your claim? ```text Claim: "Tests pass" Command: npm test (or project's test command) Claim: "Build succeeds" Command: npm run build (or project's build command) Claim: "Lint is clean" Command: npm run lint (or project's lint command) Claim: "Bug is fixed" Command: The reproduction steps that previously failed ``` ### Step 2: Run Execute the command freshly. Not from cache. Not from memory. ```text Run the command NOW. Wait for it to complete. Do not proceed until finished. ``` ### Step 3: Read Read the COMPLETE output. ```text - Exit code (0 = success) - All output lines, not just the last one - Any warnings (not just errors) - Summary statistics if provided ``` ### Step 4: Verify Confirm the output supports your claim. ```text Claim: "Tests pass" Verify: Exit code 0, "X tests passed", no failures Claim: "Build succeeds" Verify: Exit code 0, output files created, no errors Claim: "Bug is fixed" Verify: Previous failure no longer occurs ``` ### Step 5: Claim Only NOW make your completion claim. ```text "Tests pass" - after seeing test output showing success "Build succeeds" - after seeing build complete without errors "Implementation complete" - after all verifications pass ``` ## Common Failure Modes ### Tests ```text What to run: Project test command What to verify: - Exit code 0 - All tests pass (not just "some tests ran") - No skipped tests (unless intentional) - No test warnings ``` ### Linting ```text What to run: Project lint command What to verify: - Exit code 0 - No errors - No new warnings (compare to baseline) ``` ### Builds ```text What to run: Project build command What to verify: - Exit code 0 - Output artifacts created - No compilation errors - No type errors ``` ### Bug Fixes ```text What to run: Steps that reproduced the bug What to verify: - Bug no longer occurs - Related functionality still works - Regression test added and passes ``` ### Delegated Work ```text What to run: Independent verification of agent's claim What to verify: - Agent's claimed output exists - Output is correct (not just present) - No silent failures masked ``` ## Rationalization Red Flags | Thought | Reality | |---------|---------| | "It should pass" | Run it and see | | "I'm confident it works" | Confidence isn't evidence | | "I already ran it earlier" | Run it again, freshly | | "The change was small" | Small changes can break things | | "I'll verify later" | Verify now or don't claim | | "The agent said it passed" | Verify agent's claims independently | | "It worked on my machine" | Run it in the target environment | | "I'm tired of running tests" | Fatigue doesn't excuse skipping verification | ## Integration with Implement Phase This skill serves as the final gate before completion claims: ```text Plan step complete? → Run step verification → Claim step done Phase complete? → Run phase verification → Claim phase done Implementation complete? → Run all verifications → Claim done ``` **Never mark a step complete without verification evidence.** ### Before Commits ```text Run before committing: 1. All tests pass 2. Lint is clean 3. Build succeeds 4. Type check passes (if applicable) ``` ### Before PRs ```text Run before creating PR: 1. All verifications from "Before Commits" 2. Branch is up to date with base 3. No merge conflicts 4. CI would pass (simulate locally if possible) ``` ### Before Claiming "Fixed" ```text Run before claiming bug is fixed: 1. Reproduction steps no longer trigger bug 2. Regression test added and passes 3. Related functionality still works 4. All other tests still pass ``` ## Verification Commands by Project Type ### Node.js / JavaScript ```text Tests: npm test Lint: npm run lint Build: npm run build Types: npm run typecheck (or tsc --noEmit) ``` ### Python ```text Tests: pytest Lint: ruff check . or flake8 Types: mypy . Format: ruff format --check . or black --check . ``` ### Ruby ```text Tests: bundle exec rspec Lint: bundle exec rubocop ``` ### Go ```text Tests: go test ./... Lint: golangci-lint run Build: go build ./... ``` ### Rust ```text Tests: cargo test Lint: cargo clippy Build: cargo build Format: cargo fmt --check ``` ## Anti-Patterns ### Partial Verification **Wrong**: Run only the test file you changed **Right**: Run full test suite to catch regressions ### Cached Results **Wrong**: Trust previous run results **Right**: Run fresh each time before claiming ### Skipping on Confidence **Wrong**: "I know this works, no need to verify" **Right**: Verify anyway, confidence isn't evidence ### Trusting Agent Claims **Wrong**: Agent said tests pass, so they pass **Right**: Run tests yourself to verify ### Rushing at End **Wrong**: Skip verification because you're almost done **Right**: Final verification is most important ## Checklist Before Completion - [ ] Identified verification command for the claim - [ ] Ran command freshly (not cached) - [ ] Read complete output - [ ] Exit code confirms success - [ ] Output matches expectations - [ ] No warnings or errors ignored - [ ] Evidence supports the specific claim being made
Related in General
modeling-omnistudio-epc-catalog
IncludedSalesforce Industries CME EPC product-modeling skill for Product2-based catalog creation. Use when creating EPC products, configuring product attributes, building offer bundles with Product Child Items, or reviewing EPC DataPack JSON metadata for product catalog changes. TRIGGER when: user creates or updates Product2 EPC records, AttributeAssignment payloads, AttributeMetadata/AttributeDefaultValues, Offer bundles, or ProductChildItem relationships. DO NOT TRIGGER when: designing OmniScripts/FlexCards/Integration Procedures (use building-omnistudio-omniscript, building-omnistudio-flexcard, or building-omnistudio-integration-procedure), implementing Apex business logic (use generating-apex), or troubleshooting deployment pipelines (use deploying-metadata).
relationship-science-coach
IncludedUse this skill for direct, practical adult relationship coaching: couples conflict, repair, trust, marriage, dating, flirting, attachment patterns, emotional connection, sex, desire differences, eroticism, kink negotiation, affection, love languages, breakups, and long-term passion. Draw on Gottman, EFT and Hold Me Tight, attachment science, modern sex research, Perel, Nagoski, Kerner, Schnarch, Love and Stosny, and flexible love-language tools. Be concrete and low-hedge. Redirect only for imminent danger, abuse, coercive control, minors, non-consent, self-harm, stalking, or medical/legal/psychiatric decisions.
building-sf-integrations
IncludedSalesforce integration architecture and runtime plumbing with 120-point scoring. Use this skill to set up Named Credentials, External Credentials, External Services, REST/SOAP callout patterns, Platform Events, and Change Data Capture. TRIGGER when: user sets up Named Credentials, External Services, REST/SOAP callouts, Platform Events, CDC, or touches .namedCredential-meta.xml files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: Connected App/OAuth config (use configuring-connected-apps), Apex-only logic (use generating-apex), or data import/export (use handling-sf-data).
venue-templates
IncludedAccess comprehensive LaTeX templates, formatting requirements, and submission guidelines for major scientific publication venues (Nature, Science, PLOS, IEEE, ACM), academic conferences (NeurIPS, ICML, CVPR, CHI), research posters, and grant proposals (NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA). This skill should be used when preparing manuscripts for journal submission, conference papers, research posters, or grant proposals and need venue-specific formatting requirements and templates.
let-fate-decide
IncludedDraws the 12 Houses of the Zodiac Tarot spread to inject entropy into planning when prompts are vague, ambiguous, or casually delegated. Interprets the spread to guide next steps. Use when the user says 'let fate decide', 'YOLO', 'whatever', 'idk', or other nonchalant phrases, makes Yu-Gi-Oh references, or when you are about to arbitrarily pick between multiple reasonable approaches. Prefer over ask-questions-if-underspecified when the user's tone is casual or playful rather than precision-seeking.
net-ops
IncludedCross-platform network troubleshooting (Windows, macOS, Linux) via local or remote shell. Use for: DNS broken, can't resolve hostnames, nslookup/dig works but apps fail, NRPT, WFP, scutil, /etc/resolver, systemd-resolved, /etc/resolv.conf, NetworkManager, VPN DNS leak residue (ProtonVPN/Mullvad/WireGuard/AnyConnect), AV/firewall blocking DNS or DoH, Tailscale DNS interaction, intermittent connectivity, remote diagnostics over SSH.