verify-larp-a

Included with Lifetime

$97 forever

Fake code detection — performative implementations, test theater, misleading patterns, red flags

Code Review

What this skill does

> **Action skill** — Fake code detection procedures: performative code, test theater, red flags, output format.

# LARP Detection

How to identify code that lies — performative implementations that look correct but don't actually work.

## Categories

**Performative implementation** — Stubs returning hardcoded values. Validation that always returns true. Error handling that swallows (`catch (e) {}`). Retry logic that doesn't retry. Async without await. Functions under 5 lines that should be complex.

**Test theater** — Mocking the thing being tested. Assertions that assert nothing (`assert(true)`). Tests changed to match broken behavior. Skipped tests with eternal TODOs. 100% coverage achieved by testing trivial paths only.

**Misleading patterns** — Comments that contradict the code. Function names that lie. "Temporary" hacks with no removal plan. Happy path only — works for the demo, crashes on real input.

## Red Flags

Automatic suspicion: `TODO`, `FIXME`, `pass`, `...`, `NotImplementedError`. Functions under 5 lines that should be complex. Empty catch blocks. Promise chains that drop errors. Timeouts set to unreasonably large values.

## Severity

**Critical** — will fail in production with user-visible impact. Stubs, missing error handling.

**Warning** — works but is deceptive. Tests that don't verify real behavior, incomplete validation.

**Suggestion** — technically correct but suspiciously simple. Under-implemented functions, unconsidered edge cases.

## Output Format

```
### [CRITICAL|WARNING] {title}
FILE: {path}:{line}

THE LIE: What the code pretends to do
THE TRUTH: What actually happens
EVIDENCE: The actual code snippet
IMPACT: What breaks when this lie is discovered in production
```

Finding no fake code is valid — report "No fake code detected" and stop.

Files: 1

Size: 2.0 KB

Complexity: 9/100

Category: Code Review

Source: https://github.com/jsai23/claude-tooling/tree/main/plugins/wf/skills/verify-larp-a

Related in Code Review

gstack

Included

Fast headless browser for QA testing and site dogfooding. Navigate pages, interact with elements, verify state, diff before/after, take annotated screenshots, test responsive layouts, forms, uploads, dialogs, and capture bug evidence. Use when asked to open or test a site, verify a deployment, dogfood a user flow, or file a bug with screenshots. (gstack)

Code Reviewscriptsfeatured

startup-due-diligence

Included

Legal due diligence review for seed-stage and Series A startups (US, Delaware C-Corp focus). Supports both investor and founder perspectives. Capabilities include: (1) Interactive document review and issue spotting; (2) Document request list generation; (3) Cap table and SAFE/convertible note analysis; (4) Red flag identification with severity ratings; (5) Diligence report generation. TRIGGERS: due diligence, DD, startup investment, cap table review, Series A, seed round, investor diligence, legal review startup, SAFE analysis, convertible note, 409A, founder vesting.

Code Reviewscripts

interview-master

Included

This skill should be used when the user asks to "generate interview questions", "prepare for interview", "optimize resume", "conduct mock interview", "analyze git commits for resume", "generate resume from code", "review my resume", or mentions interview preparation, career assistance, or extracting project experience from git history. Provides comprehensive interview and career development guidance for both job seekers and interviewers.

Code Reviewscripts

fix-issue

Included

Fixes GitHub issues using parallel analysis agents for root cause investigation, code exploration, and regression detection. Reads issue context from gh CLI, searches codebase and memory for related patterns, generates a fix with tests, and links the resolution back to the issue via PR. Includes prevention analysis to avoid recurrence. Use when debugging errors, resolving regressions, fixing bugs, or triaging issues.

Code Reviewscripts

sf-apex

Included

Generates and reviews Salesforce Apex code with 150-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user writes, reviews, or fixes Apex classes, triggers, test classes, batch/queueable/schedulable jobs, or touches .cls/.trigger files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: LWC JavaScript (use sf-lwc), Flow XML (use sf-flow), SOQL-only queries (use sf-soql), or non-Salesforce code.

Code Reviewscripts

swift-development

Included

Comprehensive Swift development for building, testing, and deploying iOS/macOS applications. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Build Swift packages or Xcode projects from command line, (2) Run tests with XCTest or Swift Testing framework, (3) Manage iOS simulators with simctl, (4) Handle code signing, provisioning profiles, and app distribution, (5) Format or lint Swift code with SwiftFormat/SwiftLint, (6) Work with Swift Package Manager (SPM), (7) Implement Swift 6 concurrency patterns (async/await, actors, Sendable), (8) Create SwiftUI views with MVVM architecture, (9) Set up Core Data or SwiftData persistence, or any other Swift/iOS/macOS development tasks.

Code Reviewscripts