vpe-review
/cs:vpe-review <plan> — Throughput-first VP of Engineering interrogation of any plan that touches delivery, eng hiring, team structure, or production discipline.
What this skill does
# /cs:vpe-review — VPE Forcing Questions **Command:** `/cs:vpe-review <plan>` The throughput-first VPE pressure-tests any plan touching eng operations. Six questions before any delivery commitment, eng hiring expansion, team restructure, or production-discipline change. ## When to Run - Before quarterly delivery commitment (sprint planning, OKR review) - Before approving an eng hiring plan - Before restructuring eng teams (splitting/merging squads, adding tribes) - Before deciding whether to hire a VPE separately from CTO (or merge them) - When production incidents are increasing - When sprint velocity is dropping but everyone says "we're working hard" ## The Six VPE Questions ### 1. What's the cycle time, and where does work wait? **No DORA, no diagnosis.** - Lead Time for Changes is the single best health metric - If you can't decompose cycle time into stages, you can't fix the bottleneck - Run `delivery_throughput_analyzer.py` ### 2. What's the DORA performance level on all 4 metrics? **One Elite metric and three Lows = bad. Four Highs = healthy.** - Deployment Frequency, Lead Time, MTTR, Change Failure Rate - The worst metric defines overall level - Fix lead time first; everything else follows ### 3. Where is the hiring funnel leaking? **"Can't find good engineers" is wrong.** - Specific stage is over-filtering OR top-of-funnel volume is too low OR offer-to-accept is broken - Run `eng_hiring_funnel_calculator.py` - If offer-to-accept < 70%, comp is below market or close discipline is weak ### 4. Is the team structure healthy for the headcount? **5-9 ICs per squad; 5-8 ICs per EM; 4-6 EMs per director.** - Run `eng_team_structure_designer.py` - Manager-trigger fires when 5+ ICs have no dedicated EM - Director-trigger fires when 3+ EMs report directly to VPE/CTO ### 5. What's the production discipline maturity? **Level 1-5; aim for Level 3 at growth stage.** - On-call rotation ≥ 6 people - Severity-defined incident response with blameless postmortems - SLOs on customer-facing services (pair with `engineering/slo-architect/`) - Continuous deployment OR scheduled — not "usually one, sometimes the other" ### 6. Are we adding a VPE separately, or is CTO doing both? **If CTO is spending > 50% on management vs strategy, VPE is needed.** - Or: VPE complement when CTO is co-founder more comfortable with strategy - VPE owns operating model; CTO owns architecture - At small scale (< 20 eng), one person can do both ## Workflow ```bash # 1. Delivery throughput python ../../../skills/vpe-advisor/scripts/delivery_throughput_analyzer.py sprint_metrics.json # 2. Hiring funnel python ../../../skills/vpe-advisor/scripts/eng_hiring_funnel_calculator.py funnel.json # 3. Team structure python ../../../skills/vpe-advisor/scripts/eng_team_structure_designer.py team.json ``` ## Output Format ```markdown # VPE Review: <plan> **Date:** YYYY-MM-DD ## The Decision Being Made [throughput | hiring | structure | production | VPE-vs-CTO] ## Delivery Throughput (if applicable) - DORA overall: Elite / High / Medium / Low - Worst metric: <DF | LT | MTTR | FR> - Bottleneck: <stage> (X% of cycle time) - Top fix: <action + owner> ## Hiring Funnel (if applicable) - End-to-end conversion: X% - Weakest stage: <stage> - Pipeline gap: +N candidates needed - Top fix: <specific action> ## Team Structure (if applicable) - Recommended: <informal pods / squads / tribes> - Manager trigger fired: yes/no - Director trigger fired: yes/no - Action: <hire EM | hire director | split squad> ## Production Discipline (if applicable) - Current maturity level: 1-5 - Next practice to add: <specific> - SLO coverage: X / Y services ## Verdict 🟢 SHIP | 🟡 SHARPEN | 🔴 BLOCK ## Next Steps [3 concrete actions] ``` ## Routing - `/cs:cto-review` — for architectural causes of throughput problems - `/cs:chro-review` — for hiring funnel comp/leveling issues - `/cs:cfo-review` — for cost-per-hire envelope and eng budget - `/cs:ciso-review` — for production discipline + compliance overlap - `/cs:decide` — log the verdict - `/cs:freeze 30` — on multi-year hiring commitments ## Related - Agent: [`cs-vpe-advisor`](../../agents/cs-vpe-advisor.md) - Skill: [`vpe-advisor`](../../../skills/vpe-advisor/SKILL.md) - Adjacent: `../../../../engineering/slo-architect/`, `../../../../engineering/feature-flags-architect/`, `../../../../engineering/chaos-engineering/` --- **Version:** 1.0.0
Related in Code Review
gstack
IncludedFast headless browser for QA testing and site dogfooding. Navigate pages, interact with elements, verify state, diff before/after, take annotated screenshots, test responsive layouts, forms, uploads, dialogs, and capture bug evidence. Use when asked to open or test a site, verify a deployment, dogfood a user flow, or file a bug with screenshots. (gstack)
startup-due-diligence
IncludedLegal due diligence review for seed-stage and Series A startups (US, Delaware C-Corp focus). Supports both investor and founder perspectives. Capabilities include: (1) Interactive document review and issue spotting; (2) Document request list generation; (3) Cap table and SAFE/convertible note analysis; (4) Red flag identification with severity ratings; (5) Diligence report generation. TRIGGERS: due diligence, DD, startup investment, cap table review, Series A, seed round, investor diligence, legal review startup, SAFE analysis, convertible note, 409A, founder vesting.
interview-master
IncludedThis skill should be used when the user asks to "generate interview questions", "prepare for interview", "optimize resume", "conduct mock interview", "analyze git commits for resume", "generate resume from code", "review my resume", or mentions interview preparation, career assistance, or extracting project experience from git history. Provides comprehensive interview and career development guidance for both job seekers and interviewers.
fix-issue
IncludedFixes GitHub issues using parallel analysis agents for root cause investigation, code exploration, and regression detection. Reads issue context from gh CLI, searches codebase and memory for related patterns, generates a fix with tests, and links the resolution back to the issue via PR. Includes prevention analysis to avoid recurrence. Use when debugging errors, resolving regressions, fixing bugs, or triaging issues.
sf-apex
IncludedGenerates and reviews Salesforce Apex code with 150-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user writes, reviews, or fixes Apex classes, triggers, test classes, batch/queueable/schedulable jobs, or touches .cls/.trigger files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: LWC JavaScript (use sf-lwc), Flow XML (use sf-flow), SOQL-only queries (use sf-soql), or non-Salesforce code.
swift-development
IncludedComprehensive Swift development for building, testing, and deploying iOS/macOS applications. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Build Swift packages or Xcode projects from command line, (2) Run tests with XCTest or Swift Testing framework, (3) Manage iOS simulators with simctl, (4) Handle code signing, provisioning profiles, and app distribution, (5) Format or lint Swift code with SwiftFormat/SwiftLint, (6) Work with Swift Package Manager (SPM), (7) Implement Swift 6 concurrency patterns (async/await, actors, Sendable), (8) Create SwiftUI views with MVVM architecture, (9) Set up Core Data or SwiftData persistence, or any other Swift/iOS/macOS development tasks.