signup-flow-cro
Signup and registration flow optimization covering SSO strategy, progressive profiling, field reduction, multi-step flow design, authentication UX, post-submit experience, and mobile registration patterns.
What this skill does
# Signup Flow CRO
Production-grade signup and registration optimization framework covering authentication strategy, field reduction methodology, multi-step flow architecture, SSO implementation, progressive profiling, credit card requirement analysis, post-submit experience design, and mobile-specific registration patterns. For post-signup onboarding, use onboarding-cro. For lead capture forms (not account creation), use form-cro.
---
## Table of Contents
- [Initial Assessment](#initial-assessment)
- [Authentication Strategy](#authentication-strategy)
- [Field Reduction Methodology](#field-reduction-methodology)
- [Multi-Step Flow Architecture](#multi-step-flow-architecture)
- [Credit Card Requirement Analysis](#credit-card-requirement-analysis)
- [Post-Submit Experience](#post-submit-experience)
- [Mobile Signup Optimization](#mobile-signup-optimization)
- [Signup Flow Patterns by Product Type](#signup-flow-patterns-by-product-type)
- [Progressive Profiling](#progressive-profiling)
- [Error and Edge Case Handling](#error-and-edge-case-handling)
- [A/B Test Framework](#ab-test-framework)
- [Metrics and Benchmarks](#metrics-and-benchmarks)
- [Output Artifacts](#output-artifacts)
- [Related Skills](#related-skills)
---
## Initial Assessment
### Required Context
| Question | Why It Matters |
|----------|---------------|
| Flow type? (free trial, freemium, paid, waitlist) | Determines friction tolerance |
| B2B or B2C? | B2B tolerates more fields, B2C needs minimal friction |
| How many steps/screens currently? | Baseline for optimization |
| What fields are required? | Identifies reduction opportunities |
| Current completion rate? | Benchmark for improvement |
| Where do users drop off? (field-level data) | Pinpoints specific friction |
| What data is needed before first product use? | Separates must-have from nice-to-have |
| What compliance requirements exist? | Constrains what can be deferred |
---
## Authentication Strategy
### Authentication Methods Ranked by Friction
| Method | Friction Level | Best For | Conversion Impact |
|--------|---------------|----------|------------------|
| Google SSO (one-click) | Very low | B2B SaaS, productivity tools | +15-30% vs email+password |
| Apple Sign In | Very low | iOS/Mac-heavy audience | +10-20% on Apple devices |
| Microsoft SSO | Low | Enterprise B2B | +10-15% for enterprise |
| GitHub SSO | Low | Developer tools | +15-25% for dev audience |
| Magic link (email) | Low | Security-conscious, B2B | +5-10% vs password |
| Email + password | Medium | Universal fallback | Baseline |
| Phone + OTP | Medium | Mobile-first, B2C | Varies by market |
| Email + password + verification | High | When verification is required | -10-20% vs no verification |
### SSO Strategy Decision
| Your Audience | Primary SSO | Secondary SSO | Keep Email+Password? |
|--------------|-------------|---------------|---------------------|
| B2B SaaS (general) | Google Workspace | Microsoft | Yes |
| Developer tools | GitHub | Google | Yes |
| Enterprise | Microsoft/Okta | Google | Yes (for personal evals) |
| B2C consumer | Google | Apple | Yes |
| Mobile-first | Apple / Google | Phone OTP | Optional |
| Privacy-focused | Magic link | Email+password | Yes |
### SSO Placement
```
┌──────────────────────────────────┐
│ Create your account │
│ │
│ [Continue with Google] │ ← SSO options first
│ [Continue with Microsoft] │
│ │
│ ──── or ──── │ ← Visual separator
│ │
│ Email: [_______________] │ ← Email+password as alternative
│ Password: [_______________] │
│ │
│ [Create Account] │
└──────────────────────────────────┘
```
**Rules:**
- SSO buttons above the email form (not below)
- Use branded button styles (Google's official button, etc.)
- "or" divider between SSO and email options
- SSO reduces fields to zero (name and email come from the provider)
---
## Field Reduction Methodology
### The "Before First Use" Test
For every field, ask: **Does the product literally not function without this data?**
| Field | Passes Test? | Action |
|-------|-------------|--------|
| Email | Yes (account identity) | Keep |
| Password | Yes (account security) | Keep (or use SSO/magic link) |
| First name | Usually no | Defer to onboarding or profile |
| Last name | No | Defer or drop entirely |
| Company name | Usually no | Enrich from email domain |
| Phone number | Rarely | Defer unless SMS verification required |
| Job title | No | Defer to onboarding or enrich |
| Team size | No | Defer to onboarding |
| How did you hear about us? | Never | Post-signup survey or attribution |
| Industry | No | Enrich from company data |
### Enrichment Sources
| Field | Enrichment Method | Timing |
|-------|-------------------|--------|
| Company name | Email domain lookup (Clearbit, Apollo) | Immediately post-signup |
| Company size | Company data API | Immediately post-signup |
| Industry | Company data API | Immediately post-signup |
| Job title | LinkedIn API or manual CSM research | Before first sales contact |
| Location | IP geolocation | On signup |
### Minimum Viable Field Sets
| Signup Type | Minimum Fields | Additional (if needed) |
|------------|----------------|----------------------|
| Freemium | Email only (or SSO) | -- |
| Free trial (product-led) | Email + Password (or SSO) | -- |
| Free trial (sales-assisted) | Email + Password + Company | + Role (for routing) |
| Paid signup | Email + Password + Payment | -- |
| Waitlist | Email | + One qualifying question |
| Enterprise trial | Email + Company + Role | + Team size (for provisioning) |
---
## Multi-Step Flow Architecture
### When to Use Multi-Step
| Condition | Single-Step | Multi-Step |
|-----------|------------|------------|
| Total fields | 1-4 | 5+ |
| Need to qualify/route | No | Yes |
| Product needs configuration | No | Yes |
| B2B with team setup | No | Yes |
### Step Design
**Step 1: Account Creation (lowest friction)**
- Email + Password (or SSO)
- NOTHING else on this step
- This is where 60%+ of abandonment happens if overloaded
**Step 2: Personalization (if needed)**
- Role / goal / use case selection
- This personalizes their product experience
- Skip button available ("Set up later")
**Step 3: Configuration (if needed)**
- Team invite, integration connect, data import
- Each sub-step is optional with "Skip for now"
- Show value of completing each ("Invite your team to collaborate")
### Progress Design
- Show step count: "Step 1 of 3"
- Show progress bar
- Label each step descriptively: "Create Account", "Your Role", "Your Team"
- Allow back navigation (preserve entered data)
- Never reset the form on back navigation or browser back button
---
## Credit Card Requirement Analysis
### Decision Framework
| Factor | Require CC | Do Not Require CC |
|--------|-----------|------------------|
| Trial conversion goal | > 60% trial-to-paid | > 30% trial-to-paid with higher volume |
| Product complexity | Simple, immediate value | Complex, needs exploration |
| ACV | > $100/month | < $100/month |
| Sales motion | Product-led | Sales-assisted |
| Competitor practice | Competitors require CC | Competitors offer CC-free trial |
| Target audience | Enterprise (committed buyers) | SMB/prosumer (browsers) |
### Impact Analysis
| Approach | Signup Volume | Trial Quality | Trial-to-Paid | Net Revenue |
|----------|-------------|---------------|---------------|-------------|
| No CC required | Higher (+40-80%) | Lower (more tire-kickers) | Lower (2-15%) | Often higher net |
| CC required | Lower | Higher (committed) | Higher (40-70%) | Depends on volume |
| CC with "$0 charge" | Middle | Middle | Middle (20-40%) | Middle |
### Recommendation Framework
**Default to no CC required** unless:
1. Your product delivers immediate, obvious value (no learning curve)
2Related in Ads & Marketing
ads
IncludedMulti-platform paid advertising audit and optimization skill. Analyzes Google, Meta, YouTube, LinkedIn, TikTok, Microsoft, and Apple Ads. 250+ checks with scoring, parallel agents, industry templates, and AI creative generation.
banana
IncludedAI image generation Creative Director powered by Google Gemini Nano Banana models. Use this skill for ANY request involving image creation, editing, visual asset production, or creative direction. Triggers on: generate an image, create a photo, edit this picture, design a logo, make a banner, visual for my anything, and all /banana commands. Handles text-to-image, image editing, multi-turn creative sessions, batch workflows, and brand presets.
rpg-migration-analyzer
IncludedAnalyzes legacy RPG (Report Program Generator) programs from AS/400 and IBM i systems for migration to modern Java applications. Extracts business logic from RPG III/IV/ILE source code, identifies data structures (D-specs), file operations (F-specs), program dependencies (CALLB/CALLP), and converts RPG constructs to Java equivalents. Generates migration reports, complexity estimates, and Java implementation strategies with POJO classes, JPA entities, and service methods. Use when modernizing AS/400 or IBM i legacy systems, analyzing RPG source files (.rpg, .rpgle, .RPGLE), converting RPG to Java, mapping data specifications to Java classes, planning legacy system migration, or when user mentions RPG analysis, Report Program Generator, RPG III/IV/ILE, AS/400 modernization, IBM i migration, packed decimal conversion, or mainframe application rewrite.
brand-library-architect
IncludedBuild a complete brand library for a product — visual asset render pipeline, brand documentation set (BRAND, COPY, MANIFESTO, BIOS, FAQ, GLOSSARY, TONE, PRICING), open-source convention files (README, CONTRIBUTING, SECURITY, CODE_OF_CONDUCT), and a self-contained press kit. This skill should be used when the user asks to "build a brand library / brand kit / press kit / brand assets" for a product, "set up a brand library workflow," "create a positioning manifesto plus visual identity," or any combination of brand documentation + visual asset pipeline. Apply phase-by-phase or run end-to-end. Templates are product-agnostic and use {{TOKEN}} placeholders the skill prompts the user to fill.
writing-tech-post
IncludedAuthors engineering blog posts end-to-end: launch deep-dives, incident postmortems, architecture migrations, performance case studies, tutorials, AI/agent system writeups, security disclosures, and research-to-product translations. Picks the correct archetype, plans the abstraction ladder, enforces an evidence cadence (diagrams, benchmarks, profiles, traces, code, ablations), tunes voice against publisher house styles (Datadog, Vercel, GitHub, AWS, Meta, Cloudflare, Jane Street), and runs a pre-publish gate for narrative momentum and disclosure ethics. Use when drafting a new engineering post, restructuring a draft that feels flat, deciding which evidence form belongs where, validating that depth and product context are balanced, or preparing a postmortem, migration, or performance narrative for external publication. Do not use for API reference documentation, README authoring, marketing copy, release notes, generic SEO content, ghost-written executive thought leadership, or non-engineering long-form essays.
blog-google
IncludedGoogle API integration for blog performance: PageSpeed Insights, CrUX Core Web Vitals with 25-week history, Search Console performance, URL Inspection, Indexing API, GA4 organic traffic, NLP entity analysis for E-E-A-T, YouTube video search for embedding, and Google Ads Keyword Planner. Progressive feature availability based on credential tier (API key, OAuth/service account, GA4, Ads). Shares config with claude-seo at ~/.config/claude-seo/google-api.json. Use when user says "google data", "page speed", "core web vitals", "search console", "indexation", "GA4", "keyword research", "nlp entities", "blog performance", "youtube search", "google api setup".